Cargando…
Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687 |
_version_ | 1782303202678407168 |
---|---|
author | Bountouris, Ioannis Kristmundsson, Thorarinn Dias, Nuno Zdanowski, Zbigniew Malina, Martin |
author_facet | Bountouris, Ioannis Kristmundsson, Thorarinn Dias, Nuno Zdanowski, Zbigniew Malina, Martin |
author_sort | Bountouris, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or without stenting, during 2008 and 2009, were included. Occluded fistulas that were dilated after successful thrombolysis were also included. Median age was 68 (interquartile range 61.5–78.5) years and 75% were male. Results. Seventy-nine (50%) of the primary PTAs required no further reintervention. The primary patency was 61% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months. Eighty (50%) of the stenoses needed at least one reintervention. Primary assisted patency (defined as patency after subsequent reinterventions) was 89% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The durability of repeated PTAs was similar to the durability of the primary PTA. However, an early primary PTA carried a higher risk for subsequent reinterventions. Successful dialysis was achieved after 98% of treatments. Nine percent of the stenoses eventually required surgical revision and 13% of the fistulas failed permanently. Conclusion. The present study suggests that most failing AV-fistulas can be salvaged endovascularly. Repeated PTA seems similarly durable as the primary PTA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3920629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39206292014-03-02 Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? Bountouris, Ioannis Kristmundsson, Thorarinn Dias, Nuno Zdanowski, Zbigniew Malina, Martin Int J Vasc Med Clinical Study Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or without stenting, during 2008 and 2009, were included. Occluded fistulas that were dilated after successful thrombolysis were also included. Median age was 68 (interquartile range 61.5–78.5) years and 75% were male. Results. Seventy-nine (50%) of the primary PTAs required no further reintervention. The primary patency was 61% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months. Eighty (50%) of the stenoses needed at least one reintervention. Primary assisted patency (defined as patency after subsequent reinterventions) was 89% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The durability of repeated PTAs was similar to the durability of the primary PTA. However, an early primary PTA carried a higher risk for subsequent reinterventions. Successful dialysis was achieved after 98% of treatments. Nine percent of the stenoses eventually required surgical revision and 13% of the fistulas failed permanently. Conclusion. The present study suggests that most failing AV-fistulas can be salvaged endovascularly. Repeated PTA seems similarly durable as the primary PTA. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3920629/ /pubmed/24587906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ioannis Bountouris et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Bountouris, Ioannis Kristmundsson, Thorarinn Dias, Nuno Zdanowski, Zbigniew Malina, Martin Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title | Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title_full | Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title_fullStr | Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title_short | Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? |
title_sort | is repeat pta of a failing hemodialysis fistula durable? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bountourisioannis isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable AT kristmundssonthorarinn isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable AT diasnuno isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable AT zdanowskizbigniew isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable AT malinamartin isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable |