Cargando…

Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?

Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bountouris, Ioannis, Kristmundsson, Thorarinn, Dias, Nuno, Zdanowski, Zbigniew, Malina, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687
_version_ 1782303202678407168
author Bountouris, Ioannis
Kristmundsson, Thorarinn
Dias, Nuno
Zdanowski, Zbigniew
Malina, Martin
author_facet Bountouris, Ioannis
Kristmundsson, Thorarinn
Dias, Nuno
Zdanowski, Zbigniew
Malina, Martin
author_sort Bountouris, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or without stenting, during 2008 and 2009, were included. Occluded fistulas that were dilated after successful thrombolysis were also included. Median age was 68 (interquartile range 61.5–78.5) years and 75% were male. Results. Seventy-nine (50%) of the primary PTAs required no further reintervention. The primary patency was 61% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months. Eighty (50%) of the stenoses needed at least one reintervention. Primary assisted patency (defined as patency after subsequent reinterventions) was 89% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The durability of repeated PTAs was similar to the durability of the primary PTA. However, an early primary PTA carried a higher risk for subsequent reinterventions. Successful dialysis was achieved after 98% of treatments. Nine percent of the stenoses eventually required surgical revision and 13% of the fistulas failed permanently. Conclusion. The present study suggests that most failing AV-fistulas can be salvaged endovascularly. Repeated PTA seems similarly durable as the primary PTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3920629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39206292014-03-02 Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable? Bountouris, Ioannis Kristmundsson, Thorarinn Dias, Nuno Zdanowski, Zbigniew Malina, Martin Int J Vasc Med Clinical Study Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or without stenting, during 2008 and 2009, were included. Occluded fistulas that were dilated after successful thrombolysis were also included. Median age was 68 (interquartile range 61.5–78.5) years and 75% were male. Results. Seventy-nine (50%) of the primary PTAs required no further reintervention. The primary patency was 61% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months. Eighty (50%) of the stenoses needed at least one reintervention. Primary assisted patency (defined as patency after subsequent reinterventions) was 89% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The durability of repeated PTAs was similar to the durability of the primary PTA. However, an early primary PTA carried a higher risk for subsequent reinterventions. Successful dialysis was achieved after 98% of treatments. Nine percent of the stenoses eventually required surgical revision and 13% of the fistulas failed permanently. Conclusion. The present study suggests that most failing AV-fistulas can be salvaged endovascularly. Repeated PTA seems similarly durable as the primary PTA. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3920629/ /pubmed/24587906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ioannis Bountouris et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Bountouris, Ioannis
Kristmundsson, Thorarinn
Dias, Nuno
Zdanowski, Zbigniew
Malina, Martin
Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title_full Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title_fullStr Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title_full_unstemmed Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title_short Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?
title_sort is repeat pta of a failing hemodialysis fistula durable?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/369687
work_keys_str_mv AT bountourisioannis isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable
AT kristmundssonthorarinn isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable
AT diasnuno isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable
AT zdanowskizbigniew isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable
AT malinamartin isrepeatptaofafailinghemodialysisfistuladurable