Cargando…

Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition

Magnetoencephalography studies in humans have shown word-selective activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) approximately 130 ms after word presentation ( Pammer et al. 2004; Cornelissen et al. 2009; Wheat et al. 2010). The role of this early frontal response is currently not known. We test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodhead, Z.V.J., Barnes, G.R., Penny, W., Moran, R., Teki, S., Price, C.J., Leff, A.P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23172772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs365
_version_ 1782303223645732864
author Woodhead, Z.V.J.
Barnes, G.R.
Penny, W.
Moran, R.
Teki, S.
Price, C.J.
Leff, A.P.
author_facet Woodhead, Z.V.J.
Barnes, G.R.
Penny, W.
Moran, R.
Teki, S.
Price, C.J.
Leff, A.P.
author_sort Woodhead, Z.V.J.
collection PubMed
description Magnetoencephalography studies in humans have shown word-selective activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) approximately 130 ms after word presentation ( Pammer et al. 2004; Cornelissen et al. 2009; Wheat et al. 2010). The role of this early frontal response is currently not known. We tested the hypothesis that the IFG provides top-down constraints on word recognition using dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalography data collected, while subjects viewed written words and false font stimuli. Subject-specific dipoles in left and right occipital, ventral occipitotemporal and frontal cortices were identified using Variational Bayesian Equivalent Current Dipole source reconstruction. A connectivity analysis tested how words and false font stimuli differentially modulated activity between these regions within the first 300 ms after stimulus presentation. We found that left inferior frontal activity showed stronger sensitivity to words than false font and a stronger feedback connection onto the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT) in the first 200 ms. Subsequently, the effect of words relative to false font was observed on feedforward connections from left occipital to ventral occipitotemporal and frontal regions. These findings demonstrate that left inferior frontal activity modulates vOT in the early stages of word processing and provides a mechanistic account of top-down effects during word recognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3920772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39207722014-02-11 Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition Woodhead, Z.V.J. Barnes, G.R. Penny, W. Moran, R. Teki, S. Price, C.J. Leff, A.P. Cereb Cortex Articles Magnetoencephalography studies in humans have shown word-selective activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) approximately 130 ms after word presentation ( Pammer et al. 2004; Cornelissen et al. 2009; Wheat et al. 2010). The role of this early frontal response is currently not known. We tested the hypothesis that the IFG provides top-down constraints on word recognition using dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalography data collected, while subjects viewed written words and false font stimuli. Subject-specific dipoles in left and right occipital, ventral occipitotemporal and frontal cortices were identified using Variational Bayesian Equivalent Current Dipole source reconstruction. A connectivity analysis tested how words and false font stimuli differentially modulated activity between these regions within the first 300 ms after stimulus presentation. We found that left inferior frontal activity showed stronger sensitivity to words than false font and a stronger feedback connection onto the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT) in the first 200 ms. Subsequently, the effect of words relative to false font was observed on feedforward connections from left occipital to ventral occipitotemporal and frontal regions. These findings demonstrate that left inferior frontal activity modulates vOT in the early stages of word processing and provides a mechanistic account of top-down effects during word recognition. Oxford University Press 2014-03 2012-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3920772/ /pubmed/23172772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs365 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Articles
Woodhead, Z.V.J.
Barnes, G.R.
Penny, W.
Moran, R.
Teki, S.
Price, C.J.
Leff, A.P.
Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title_full Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title_fullStr Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title_short Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition
title_sort reading front to back: meg evidence for early feedback effects during word recognition
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23172772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs365
work_keys_str_mv AT woodheadzvj readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT barnesgr readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT pennyw readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT moranr readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT tekis readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT pricecj readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition
AT leffap readingfronttobackmegevidenceforearlyfeedbackeffectsduringwordrecognition