Cargando…

A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer

Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extrape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heiying, Jin, Yonghong, Du, Xiaofeng, Wang, Hang, Yao, Kunlan, Wu, Bei, Zhang, Jinhao, Zhang, Qiang, Leng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036
_version_ 1782303256330895360
author Heiying, Jin
Yonghong, Du
Xiaofeng, Wang
Hang, Yao
Kunlan, Wu
Bei, Zhang
Jinhao, Zhang
Qiang, Leng
author_facet Heiying, Jin
Yonghong, Du
Xiaofeng, Wang
Hang, Yao
Kunlan, Wu
Bei, Zhang
Jinhao, Zhang
Qiang, Leng
author_sort Heiying, Jin
collection PubMed
description Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18) and intraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18). Short- and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. All patients were followed up and the median duration was 17 months (range: 12–24). Results: The rates of short-term complication related to colostomies were comparable between the two groups, except the rate for stoma edema was higher in the extraperitoneal group (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.008). In the intraperitoneal ostomy group, two patients developed stoma prolapse, one had stoma stenosis, and two had parastomal hernia. In contrast, no long-term complications related to colostomies occurred in the extraperitoneal ostomy group. The rate of long-term complication was lower in the extraperitoneal ostomy group (0% vs 22.2%; P = 0.036). Conclusion: The laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy is a relatively simple and safe procedure, with fewer long-term complications related to colostomy. However the follow-up period was not too long and needs to be extended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3920995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39209952014-02-12 A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer Heiying, Jin Yonghong, Du Xiaofeng, Wang Hang, Yao Kunlan, Wu Bei, Zhang Jinhao, Zhang Qiang, Leng Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18) and intraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18). Short- and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. All patients were followed up and the median duration was 17 months (range: 12–24). Results: The rates of short-term complication related to colostomies were comparable between the two groups, except the rate for stoma edema was higher in the extraperitoneal group (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.008). In the intraperitoneal ostomy group, two patients developed stoma prolapse, one had stoma stenosis, and two had parastomal hernia. In contrast, no long-term complications related to colostomies occurred in the extraperitoneal ostomy group. The rate of long-term complication was lower in the extraperitoneal ostomy group (0% vs 22.2%; P = 0.036). Conclusion: The laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy is a relatively simple and safe procedure, with fewer long-term complications related to colostomy. However the follow-up period was not too long and needs to be extended. Oxford University Press 2014-02 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3920995/ /pubmed/24760238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Heiying, Jin
Yonghong, Du
Xiaofeng, Wang
Hang, Yao
Kunlan, Wu
Bei, Zhang
Jinhao, Zhang
Qiang, Leng
A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title_full A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title_fullStr A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title_short A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
title_sort study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036
work_keys_str_mv AT heiyingjin astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT yonghongdu astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT xiaofengwang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT hangyao astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT kunlanwu astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT beizhang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT jinhaozhang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT qiangleng astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT heiyingjin studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT yonghongdu studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT xiaofengwang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT hangyao studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT kunlanwu studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT beizhang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT jinhaozhang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer
AT qiangleng studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer