Cargando…
A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer
Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extrape...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036 |
_version_ | 1782303256330895360 |
---|---|
author | Heiying, Jin Yonghong, Du Xiaofeng, Wang Hang, Yao Kunlan, Wu Bei, Zhang Jinhao, Zhang Qiang, Leng |
author_facet | Heiying, Jin Yonghong, Du Xiaofeng, Wang Hang, Yao Kunlan, Wu Bei, Zhang Jinhao, Zhang Qiang, Leng |
author_sort | Heiying, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18) and intraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18). Short- and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. All patients were followed up and the median duration was 17 months (range: 12–24). Results: The rates of short-term complication related to colostomies were comparable between the two groups, except the rate for stoma edema was higher in the extraperitoneal group (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.008). In the intraperitoneal ostomy group, two patients developed stoma prolapse, one had stoma stenosis, and two had parastomal hernia. In contrast, no long-term complications related to colostomies occurred in the extraperitoneal ostomy group. The rate of long-term complication was lower in the extraperitoneal ostomy group (0% vs 22.2%; P = 0.036). Conclusion: The laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy is a relatively simple and safe procedure, with fewer long-term complications related to colostomy. However the follow-up period was not too long and needs to be extended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3920995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39209952014-02-12 A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer Heiying, Jin Yonghong, Du Xiaofeng, Wang Hang, Yao Kunlan, Wu Bei, Zhang Jinhao, Zhang Qiang, Leng Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles Objective: To established a procedure for laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and study safety aspects and complications. Method: From July 2011 to July 2012, 36 patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR were included in the study and divided into extraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18) and intraperitoneal ostomy group (n = 18). Short- and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. All patients were followed up and the median duration was 17 months (range: 12–24). Results: The rates of short-term complication related to colostomies were comparable between the two groups, except the rate for stoma edema was higher in the extraperitoneal group (33.3% vs 0%; P = 0.008). In the intraperitoneal ostomy group, two patients developed stoma prolapse, one had stoma stenosis, and two had parastomal hernia. In contrast, no long-term complications related to colostomies occurred in the extraperitoneal ostomy group. The rate of long-term complication was lower in the extraperitoneal ostomy group (0% vs 22.2%; P = 0.036). Conclusion: The laparoscopic extraperitoneal ostomy is a relatively simple and safe procedure, with fewer long-term complications related to colostomy. However the follow-up period was not too long and needs to be extended. Oxford University Press 2014-02 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3920995/ /pubmed/24760238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Heiying, Jin Yonghong, Du Xiaofeng, Wang Hang, Yao Kunlan, Wu Bei, Zhang Jinhao, Zhang Qiang, Leng A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title | A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title_full | A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title_short | A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
title_sort | study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heiyingjin astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT yonghongdu astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT xiaofengwang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT hangyao astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT kunlanwu astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT beizhang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT jinhaozhang astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT qiangleng astudyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT heiyingjin studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT yonghongdu studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT xiaofengwang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT hangyao studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT kunlanwu studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT beizhang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT jinhaozhang studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer AT qiangleng studyoflaparoscopicextraperitonealsigmoidcolostomyafterabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancer |