Cargando…

Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are useful therapeutic techniques for colorectal tumors. Currently, new techniques based on these procedures are available, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection with snare (ESD-S) and endoscopic mucosal resection with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Shilun, Zhong, Yunshi, Zhou, Pinghong, Xu, Jianmin, Yao, Liqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got034
_version_ 1782303257499009024
author Cai, Shilun
Zhong, Yunshi
Zhou, Pinghong
Xu, Jianmin
Yao, Liqing
author_facet Cai, Shilun
Zhong, Yunshi
Zhou, Pinghong
Xu, Jianmin
Yao, Liqing
author_sort Cai, Shilun
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are useful therapeutic techniques for colorectal tumors. Currently, new techniques based on these procedures are available, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection with snare (ESD-S) and endoscopic mucosal resection with pre-cutting (EMR-P). For the excision of colorectal tumors, each of these techniques has been characterized as having a high total resection rate, low recurrence rate or low complication rate. In this study, we analysed clinical trials that had recently been published, to search for the most appropriate endoscopic treatment for colorectal tumors. Our search results revealed the following: for a tumor with a diameter less than 20 mm, the surgeon should choose ESD, ESD-S, EMR-P or EMR, depending on the condition of the tumor. On the other hand, to excise a tumor larger than 20 mm in diameter, ESD and ESD-S should be the first choices. However, if the patient has a high risk of complications due to ESD or ESD-S, the use of EMR-P would be suitable. Because of the high possibility of canceration in a tumor larger than 20 mm in diameter, EMR is not the optimal endoscopic treatment for the excision of a colorectal tumor, due to a low total resection rate and a high recurrence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39210002014-02-12 Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review Cai, Shilun Zhong, Yunshi Zhou, Pinghong Xu, Jianmin Yao, Liqing Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Reviews Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are useful therapeutic techniques for colorectal tumors. Currently, new techniques based on these procedures are available, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection with snare (ESD-S) and endoscopic mucosal resection with pre-cutting (EMR-P). For the excision of colorectal tumors, each of these techniques has been characterized as having a high total resection rate, low recurrence rate or low complication rate. In this study, we analysed clinical trials that had recently been published, to search for the most appropriate endoscopic treatment for colorectal tumors. Our search results revealed the following: for a tumor with a diameter less than 20 mm, the surgeon should choose ESD, ESD-S, EMR-P or EMR, depending on the condition of the tumor. On the other hand, to excise a tumor larger than 20 mm in diameter, ESD and ESD-S should be the first choices. However, if the patient has a high risk of complications due to ESD or ESD-S, the use of EMR-P would be suitable. Because of the high possibility of canceration in a tumor larger than 20 mm in diameter, EMR is not the optimal endoscopic treatment for the excision of a colorectal tumor, due to a low total resection rate and a high recurrence rate. Oxford University Press 2014-02 2013-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3921000/ /pubmed/24760234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got034 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Cai, Shilun
Zhong, Yunshi
Zhou, Pinghong
Xu, Jianmin
Yao, Liqing
Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title_full Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title_short Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
title_sort re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got034
work_keys_str_mv AT caishilun reevaluationofindicationsandoutcomesofendoscopicexcisionproceduresforcolorectaltumorsareview
AT zhongyunshi reevaluationofindicationsandoutcomesofendoscopicexcisionproceduresforcolorectaltumorsareview
AT zhoupinghong reevaluationofindicationsandoutcomesofendoscopicexcisionproceduresforcolorectaltumorsareview
AT xujianmin reevaluationofindicationsandoutcomesofendoscopicexcisionproceduresforcolorectaltumorsareview
AT yaoliqing reevaluationofindicationsandoutcomesofendoscopicexcisionproceduresforcolorectaltumorsareview