Cargando…

Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models

Understanding habits at a biological level requires a combination of behavioral observations and measures of ongoing neural activity. Theoretical frameworks as well as definitions of habitual behaviors emerging from classic behavioral research have been enriched by new approaches taking account of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Kyle S., Graybiel, Ann M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24574988
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00039
_version_ 1782303314045566976
author Smith, Kyle S.
Graybiel, Ann M.
author_facet Smith, Kyle S.
Graybiel, Ann M.
author_sort Smith, Kyle S.
collection PubMed
description Understanding habits at a biological level requires a combination of behavioral observations and measures of ongoing neural activity. Theoretical frameworks as well as definitions of habitual behaviors emerging from classic behavioral research have been enriched by new approaches taking account of the identification of brain regions and circuits related to habitual behavior. Together, this combination of experimental and theoretical work has provided key insights into how brain circuits underlying action-learning and action-selection are organized, and how a balance between behavioral flexibility and fixity is achieved. New methods to monitor and manipulate neural activity in real time are allowing us to have a first look “under the hood” of a habit as it is formed and expressed. Here we discuss ideas emerging from such approaches. We pay special attention to the unexpected findings that have arisen from our own experiments suggesting that habitual behaviors likely require the simultaneous activity of multiple distinct components, or operators, seen as responsible for the contrasting dynamics of neural activity in both cortico-limbic and sensorimotor circuits recorded concurrently during different stages of habit learning. The neural dynamics identified thus far do not fully meet expectations derived from traditional models of the structure of habits, and the behavioral measures of habits that we have made also are not fully aligned with these models. We explore these new clues as opportunities to refine an understanding of habits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39215762014-02-26 Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models Smith, Kyle S. Graybiel, Ann M. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Understanding habits at a biological level requires a combination of behavioral observations and measures of ongoing neural activity. Theoretical frameworks as well as definitions of habitual behaviors emerging from classic behavioral research have been enriched by new approaches taking account of the identification of brain regions and circuits related to habitual behavior. Together, this combination of experimental and theoretical work has provided key insights into how brain circuits underlying action-learning and action-selection are organized, and how a balance between behavioral flexibility and fixity is achieved. New methods to monitor and manipulate neural activity in real time are allowing us to have a first look “under the hood” of a habit as it is formed and expressed. Here we discuss ideas emerging from such approaches. We pay special attention to the unexpected findings that have arisen from our own experiments suggesting that habitual behaviors likely require the simultaneous activity of multiple distinct components, or operators, seen as responsible for the contrasting dynamics of neural activity in both cortico-limbic and sensorimotor circuits recorded concurrently during different stages of habit learning. The neural dynamics identified thus far do not fully meet expectations derived from traditional models of the structure of habits, and the behavioral measures of habits that we have made also are not fully aligned with these models. We explore these new clues as opportunities to refine an understanding of habits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3921576/ /pubmed/24574988 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00039 Text en Copyright © 2014 Smith and Graybiel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Smith, Kyle S.
Graybiel, Ann M.
Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title_full Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title_fullStr Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title_full_unstemmed Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title_short Investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
title_sort investigating habits: strategies, technologies and models
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24574988
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00039
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkyles investigatinghabitsstrategiestechnologiesandmodels
AT graybielannm investigatinghabitsstrategiestechnologiesandmodels