Cargando…

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer Gleason score 6 is the most common score detected on prostatic biopsy. We analyzed the clinical parameters that predict the likelihood of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 241 patients who underwent radical ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milonas, Daimantas, Grybas, Aivaras, Auskalnis, Stasys, Gudinaviciene, Inga, Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas, Kincius, Marius, Jievaltas, Mindaugas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578894
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art3
_version_ 1782303340918472704
author Milonas, Daimantas
Grybas, Aivaras
Auskalnis, Stasys
Gudinaviciene, Inga
Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
Kincius, Marius
Jievaltas, Mindaugas
author_facet Milonas, Daimantas
Grybas, Aivaras
Auskalnis, Stasys
Gudinaviciene, Inga
Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
Kincius, Marius
Jievaltas, Mindaugas
author_sort Milonas, Daimantas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer Gleason score 6 is the most common score detected on prostatic biopsy. We analyzed the clinical parameters that predict the likelihood of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 241 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between Feb 2002 and Dec 2007 for Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma. The influence of preoperative parameters on the probability of a Gleason score upgrading after surgery was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves. RESULTS: Gleason score upgrade was found in 92 of 241 patients (38.2%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only percentage of cancer in dominant lobe and prostate weight were significant predictors for Gleason score upgrading (p = 0.043 and p = 0.006, respectively). ROC curves showed that prostate weight and PSA density were only two independent significant parameters for prediction of upgrade (AUC – 0.634, p <0.0001 and 0.604, p = 0.006, respectively). Gleason score upgrading was observed to be accompanied by significantly higher rates of extra prostatic extension (p <0.001) and seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Almost forty percent of tumors graded Gleason 6 at biopsy are Gleason 7 at surgery. Upgraded tumors significantly associated with adverse pathological features. The probability of Gleason score upgrade can be predicted using prostate weight and PSA density as independent parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39217362014-02-27 Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy Milonas, Daimantas Grybas, Aivaras Auskalnis, Stasys Gudinaviciene, Inga Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas Kincius, Marius Jievaltas, Mindaugas Cent European J Urol Urological Oncology OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer Gleason score 6 is the most common score detected on prostatic biopsy. We analyzed the clinical parameters that predict the likelihood of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 241 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between Feb 2002 and Dec 2007 for Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma. The influence of preoperative parameters on the probability of a Gleason score upgrading after surgery was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves. RESULTS: Gleason score upgrade was found in 92 of 241 patients (38.2%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only percentage of cancer in dominant lobe and prostate weight were significant predictors for Gleason score upgrading (p = 0.043 and p = 0.006, respectively). ROC curves showed that prostate weight and PSA density were only two independent significant parameters for prediction of upgrade (AUC – 0.634, p <0.0001 and 0.604, p = 0.006, respectively). Gleason score upgrading was observed to be accompanied by significantly higher rates of extra prostatic extension (p <0.001) and seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Almost forty percent of tumors graded Gleason 6 at biopsy are Gleason 7 at surgery. Upgraded tumors significantly associated with adverse pathological features. The probability of Gleason score upgrade can be predicted using prostate weight and PSA density as independent parameters. Polish Urological Association 2011-12-09 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3921736/ /pubmed/24578894 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art3 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Urological Oncology
Milonas, Daimantas
Grybas, Aivaras
Auskalnis, Stasys
Gudinaviciene, Inga
Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
Kincius, Marius
Jievaltas, Mindaugas
Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title_full Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title_short Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
title_sort factors predicting gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
topic Urological Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578894
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art3
work_keys_str_mv AT milonasdaimantas factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT grybasaivaras factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT auskalnisstasys factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT gudinavicieneinga factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT baltrimaviciusruslanas factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kinciusmarius factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT jievaltasmindaugas factorspredictinggleasonscore6upgradingafterradicalprostatectomy