Cargando…
Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7 |
_version_ | 1782303344173252608 |
---|---|
author | Santos, Pedro Bargão Graça, Bruno Lourenço, Miguel Coelho, Manuel Ferreira Ribeiro, Fernando Fonseca, Júlio Cardoso, A. Pepe Varregoso, João Ferrito, Fernando Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho |
author_facet | Santos, Pedro Bargão Graça, Bruno Lourenço, Miguel Coelho, Manuel Ferreira Ribeiro, Fernando Fonseca, Júlio Cardoso, A. Pepe Varregoso, João Ferrito, Fernando Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho |
author_sort | Santos, Pedro Bargão |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved in BR in the absence of PSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consultation of 171 medical-records from patients submitted to RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy) between January/2000-December/2005. Mean-age: 64 yr. Mean – PSA (positive surgical margin): 11.88 ng/ml. Clinical staging: 67.8% cT1, 32.2% cT2. GS: ≤6 (66.1%), =7 (21.1%), 8-10 (12.3%). PS: pT0 1.2%, pT2 50.3%, pT3a 36.3%, pT3b 12.9%, pT4 0.6%. pathological Gleason score: ≤6 39.2%, =7 40.9%, 8-10 19.3%. RB definition was PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Adjusted Odds-Ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were PSM in 46 specimens, 28 had single PSM and 18 multiple PSM (≥2). BR occurred in 57 patients (33.3%), with an average time after surgery of 23.5 months – 26 patients had PSM and 31 had not. Statistical significant results for BR in variables PSA, PS and PSM. Quadruples if PSM (p <0.0001), triples in single PSM (p = 0.01) and is 6x higher in multiple PSM (p = 0.001). Regarding factors that influence the presence of PSM, only PS ≥pT3a reach statistical significance (p <0.0001). Patients with BR but without PSM (54.38%), variables statistically significant were: initial PSA >10, (p = 0.029) and pathological Gleason score ≥8 with a risk nearly 4x higher than pathological Gleason score ≤6 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical risk analysis concluded that the presence of PSM in RRP is strongly influenced by PS ≥pT3a. The presence of PSM and their number increase significantly the risk of BR compared to other factors. In the absence of PSM, the factors that seem to be crucial and with greater impact on BR are initial PSA>10 and pathological Gleason score ≥8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3921750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39217502014-02-27 Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) Santos, Pedro Bargão Graça, Bruno Lourenço, Miguel Coelho, Manuel Ferreira Ribeiro, Fernando Fonseca, Júlio Cardoso, A. Pepe Varregoso, João Ferrito, Fernando Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho Cent European J Urol Urological Oncology INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved in BR in the absence of PSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consultation of 171 medical-records from patients submitted to RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy) between January/2000-December/2005. Mean-age: 64 yr. Mean – PSA (positive surgical margin): 11.88 ng/ml. Clinical staging: 67.8% cT1, 32.2% cT2. GS: ≤6 (66.1%), =7 (21.1%), 8-10 (12.3%). PS: pT0 1.2%, pT2 50.3%, pT3a 36.3%, pT3b 12.9%, pT4 0.6%. pathological Gleason score: ≤6 39.2%, =7 40.9%, 8-10 19.3%. RB definition was PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Adjusted Odds-Ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were PSM in 46 specimens, 28 had single PSM and 18 multiple PSM (≥2). BR occurred in 57 patients (33.3%), with an average time after surgery of 23.5 months – 26 patients had PSM and 31 had not. Statistical significant results for BR in variables PSA, PS and PSM. Quadruples if PSM (p <0.0001), triples in single PSM (p = 0.01) and is 6x higher in multiple PSM (p = 0.001). Regarding factors that influence the presence of PSM, only PS ≥pT3a reach statistical significance (p <0.0001). Patients with BR but without PSM (54.38%), variables statistically significant were: initial PSA >10, (p = 0.029) and pathological Gleason score ≥8 with a risk nearly 4x higher than pathological Gleason score ≤6 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical risk analysis concluded that the presence of PSM in RRP is strongly influenced by PS ≥pT3a. The presence of PSM and their number increase significantly the risk of BR compared to other factors. In the absence of PSM, the factors that seem to be crucial and with greater impact on BR are initial PSA>10 and pathological Gleason score ≥8. Polish Urological Association 2011-12-09 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3921750/ /pubmed/24578898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Urological Oncology Santos, Pedro Bargão Graça, Bruno Lourenço, Miguel Coelho, Manuel Ferreira Ribeiro, Fernando Fonseca, Júlio Cardoso, A. Pepe Varregoso, João Ferrito, Fernando Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title | Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title_full | Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title_fullStr | Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title_short | Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) |
title_sort | impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (rrp) |
topic | Urological Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santospedrobargao impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT gracabruno impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT lourencomiguel impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT coelhomanuelferreira impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT ribeirofernando impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT fonsecajulio impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT cardosoapepe impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT varregosojoao impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT ferritofernando impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp AT gomesfranciscocarrasquinho impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp |