Cargando…

Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)

INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Pedro Bargão, Graça, Bruno, Lourenço, Miguel, Coelho, Manuel Ferreira, Ribeiro, Fernando, Fonseca, Júlio, Cardoso, A. Pepe, Varregoso, João, Ferrito, Fernando, Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578898
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7
_version_ 1782303344173252608
author Santos, Pedro Bargão
Graça, Bruno
Lourenço, Miguel
Coelho, Manuel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Fernando
Fonseca, Júlio
Cardoso, A. Pepe
Varregoso, João
Ferrito, Fernando
Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho
author_facet Santos, Pedro Bargão
Graça, Bruno
Lourenço, Miguel
Coelho, Manuel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Fernando
Fonseca, Júlio
Cardoso, A. Pepe
Varregoso, João
Ferrito, Fernando
Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho
author_sort Santos, Pedro Bargão
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved in BR in the absence of PSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consultation of 171 medical-records from patients submitted to RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy) between January/2000-December/2005. Mean-age: 64 yr. Mean – PSA (positive surgical margin): 11.88 ng/ml. Clinical staging: 67.8% cT1, 32.2% cT2. GS: ≤6 (66.1%), =7 (21.1%), 8-10 (12.3%). PS: pT0 1.2%, pT2 50.3%, pT3a 36.3%, pT3b 12.9%, pT4 0.6%. pathological Gleason score: ≤6 39.2%, =7 40.9%, 8-10 19.3%. RB definition was PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Adjusted Odds-Ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were PSM in 46 specimens, 28 had single PSM and 18 multiple PSM (≥2). BR occurred in 57 patients (33.3%), with an average time after surgery of 23.5 months – 26 patients had PSM and 31 had not. Statistical significant results for BR in variables PSA, PS and PSM. Quadruples if PSM (p <0.0001), triples in single PSM (p = 0.01) and is 6x higher in multiple PSM (p = 0.001). Regarding factors that influence the presence of PSM, only PS ≥pT3a reach statistical significance (p <0.0001). Patients with BR but without PSM (54.38%), variables statistically significant were: initial PSA >10, (p = 0.029) and pathological Gleason score ≥8 with a risk nearly 4x higher than pathological Gleason score ≤6 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical risk analysis concluded that the presence of PSM in RRP is strongly influenced by PS ≥pT3a. The presence of PSM and their number increase significantly the risk of BR compared to other factors. In the absence of PSM, the factors that seem to be crucial and with greater impact on BR are initial PSA>10 and pathological Gleason score ≥8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39217502014-02-27 Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) Santos, Pedro Bargão Graça, Bruno Lourenço, Miguel Coelho, Manuel Ferreira Ribeiro, Fernando Fonseca, Júlio Cardoso, A. Pepe Varregoso, João Ferrito, Fernando Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho Cent European J Urol Urological Oncology INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved in BR in the absence of PSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consultation of 171 medical-records from patients submitted to RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy) between January/2000-December/2005. Mean-age: 64 yr. Mean – PSA (positive surgical margin): 11.88 ng/ml. Clinical staging: 67.8% cT1, 32.2% cT2. GS: ≤6 (66.1%), =7 (21.1%), 8-10 (12.3%). PS: pT0 1.2%, pT2 50.3%, pT3a 36.3%, pT3b 12.9%, pT4 0.6%. pathological Gleason score: ≤6 39.2%, =7 40.9%, 8-10 19.3%. RB definition was PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Adjusted Odds-Ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were PSM in 46 specimens, 28 had single PSM and 18 multiple PSM (≥2). BR occurred in 57 patients (33.3%), with an average time after surgery of 23.5 months – 26 patients had PSM and 31 had not. Statistical significant results for BR in variables PSA, PS and PSM. Quadruples if PSM (p <0.0001), triples in single PSM (p = 0.01) and is 6x higher in multiple PSM (p = 0.001). Regarding factors that influence the presence of PSM, only PS ≥pT3a reach statistical significance (p <0.0001). Patients with BR but without PSM (54.38%), variables statistically significant were: initial PSA >10, (p = 0.029) and pathological Gleason score ≥8 with a risk nearly 4x higher than pathological Gleason score ≤6 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical risk analysis concluded that the presence of PSM in RRP is strongly influenced by PS ≥pT3a. The presence of PSM and their number increase significantly the risk of BR compared to other factors. In the absence of PSM, the factors that seem to be crucial and with greater impact on BR are initial PSA>10 and pathological Gleason score ≥8. Polish Urological Association 2011-12-09 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3921750/ /pubmed/24578898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Urological Oncology
Santos, Pedro Bargão
Graça, Bruno
Lourenço, Miguel
Coelho, Manuel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Fernando
Fonseca, Júlio
Cardoso, A. Pepe
Varregoso, João
Ferrito, Fernando
Gomes, Francisco Carrasquinho
Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title_full Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title_fullStr Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title_full_unstemmed Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title_short Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP)
title_sort impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (rrp)
topic Urological Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578898
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7
work_keys_str_mv AT santospedrobargao impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT gracabruno impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT lourencomiguel impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT coelhomanuelferreira impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT ribeirofernando impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT fonsecajulio impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT cardosoapepe impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT varregosojoao impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT ferritofernando impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp
AT gomesfranciscocarrasquinho impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsonbiochemicalrelapseafterradicalretropubicprostatectomyrrp