Cargando…

Cell phone usage and erectile function

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this pilot study was to report our experience concerning the effects of cell phone usage on erectile function (EF) in men. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 20 consecutive men complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months (Group A), and another grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad, Patzak, Johanna, Fischereder, Katja, Pummer, Karl, Shamloul, Rany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578997
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art23
_version_ 1782303365483462656
author Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Fischereder, Katja
Pummer, Karl
Shamloul, Rany
author_facet Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Fischereder, Katja
Pummer, Karl
Shamloul, Rany
author_sort Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective of this pilot study was to report our experience concerning the effects of cell phone usage on erectile function (EF) in men. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 20 consecutive men complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months (Group A), and another group of 10 healthy men with no complaints of ED (Group B). Anamnesis, basic laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations were performed. All men completed the German version of the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) for evaluation of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), as well as another questionnaire designed by our clinicians that assessed cell phone usage habits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between both groups regarding age, weight, height, and total testosterone (Table 1). The SHIM scores of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B, 11.2 ±5 and 24.2 ±2.3, respectively. Total time spent talking on the cell phone per week was not significantly higher in Group A over B, 17.6 ±11.1 vs. 12.5 ±7 hours. Men with ED were found to carry their ‘switched on’ cell phones for a significantly longer time than those without ED, 4.4 ±3.6 vs. 1.8 ±1 hours per day. CONCLUSIONS: We found a potential correlation with cell phone usage and a negative impact on EF. Further large–scale studies confirming our initial data and exploring the mechanisms involved in this phenomenon are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39218482014-02-27 Cell phone usage and erectile function Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Fischereder, Katja Pummer, Karl Shamloul, Rany Cent European J Urol Short Communication INTRODUCTION: The objective of this pilot study was to report our experience concerning the effects of cell phone usage on erectile function (EF) in men. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 20 consecutive men complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months (Group A), and another group of 10 healthy men with no complaints of ED (Group B). Anamnesis, basic laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations were performed. All men completed the German version of the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) for evaluation of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), as well as another questionnaire designed by our clinicians that assessed cell phone usage habits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between both groups regarding age, weight, height, and total testosterone (Table 1). The SHIM scores of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B, 11.2 ±5 and 24.2 ±2.3, respectively. Total time spent talking on the cell phone per week was not significantly higher in Group A over B, 17.6 ±11.1 vs. 12.5 ±7 hours. Men with ED were found to carry their ‘switched on’ cell phones for a significantly longer time than those without ED, 4.4 ±3.6 vs. 1.8 ±1 hours per day. CONCLUSIONS: We found a potential correlation with cell phone usage and a negative impact on EF. Further large–scale studies confirming our initial data and exploring the mechanisms involved in this phenomenon are recommended. Polish Urological Association 2013-04-26 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3921848/ /pubmed/24578997 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art23 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Fischereder, Katja
Pummer, Karl
Shamloul, Rany
Cell phone usage and erectile function
title Cell phone usage and erectile function
title_full Cell phone usage and erectile function
title_fullStr Cell phone usage and erectile function
title_full_unstemmed Cell phone usage and erectile function
title_short Cell phone usage and erectile function
title_sort cell phone usage and erectile function
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578997
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art23
work_keys_str_mv AT alalibadereddinmohamad cellphoneusageanderectilefunction
AT patzakjohanna cellphoneusageanderectilefunction
AT fischerederkatja cellphoneusageanderectilefunction
AT pummerkarl cellphoneusageanderectilefunction
AT shamloulrany cellphoneusageanderectilefunction