Cargando…

Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System

INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnershi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basu Roy, Upal, Michel, Tamara, Carpenter, Alison, Lounsbury, David W., Sabino, Eilleen, Stevenson, Alexis Jurow, Combs, Sarah, Jacobs, Jasmine, Padgett, Deborah, Rapkin, Bruce D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24503342
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176
_version_ 1782303374571470848
author Basu Roy, Upal
Michel, Tamara
Carpenter, Alison
Lounsbury, David W.
Sabino, Eilleen
Stevenson, Alexis Jurow
Combs, Sarah
Jacobs, Jasmine
Padgett, Deborah
Rapkin, Bruce D.
author_facet Basu Roy, Upal
Michel, Tamara
Carpenter, Alison
Lounsbury, David W.
Sabino, Eilleen
Stevenson, Alexis Jurow
Combs, Sarah
Jacobs, Jasmine
Padgett, Deborah
Rapkin, Bruce D.
author_sort Basu Roy, Upal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnership, Queens Library HealthLink, which aimed to reduce cancer disparities through neighborhood groups (Cancer Action Councils) that convened in public libraries in Queens, New York. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to conduct 69 telephone survey interviews and 4 focus groups (15 participants) with Cancer Action Council members. We used 4 performance criteria to inform data collection: action or attention to sustainability, library support for the council, social cohesion and group leadership, and activity level. Focus group transcripts were independently coded and cross-checked for consensus until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Members reported benefits and barriers to participation. Thirty-three original focus group transcript codes were organized into 8 main themes related to member experiences: 1) library as a needed resource, 2) library as a reputable and nondenominational institution, 3) value of library staff, 4) need for a HealthLink specialist, 5) generation of ideas and coordination of tasks, 6) participation challenges, 7) use of community connections, and 8) collaboration for sustainability. CONCLUSION: In response to the process evaluation, Cancer Action Council members and HealthLink staff incorporated member suggestions to improve council sustainability. The councils merged to increase intercouncil collaboration, and institutional changes were made in funding to sustain a HealthLink specialist beyond the grant period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39219042014-02-24 Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System Basu Roy, Upal Michel, Tamara Carpenter, Alison Lounsbury, David W. Sabino, Eilleen Stevenson, Alexis Jurow Combs, Sarah Jacobs, Jasmine Padgett, Deborah Rapkin, Bruce D. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnership, Queens Library HealthLink, which aimed to reduce cancer disparities through neighborhood groups (Cancer Action Councils) that convened in public libraries in Queens, New York. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to conduct 69 telephone survey interviews and 4 focus groups (15 participants) with Cancer Action Council members. We used 4 performance criteria to inform data collection: action or attention to sustainability, library support for the council, social cohesion and group leadership, and activity level. Focus group transcripts were independently coded and cross-checked for consensus until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Members reported benefits and barriers to participation. Thirty-three original focus group transcript codes were organized into 8 main themes related to member experiences: 1) library as a needed resource, 2) library as a reputable and nondenominational institution, 3) value of library staff, 4) need for a HealthLink specialist, 5) generation of ideas and coordination of tasks, 6) participation challenges, 7) use of community connections, and 8) collaboration for sustainability. CONCLUSION: In response to the process evaluation, Cancer Action Council members and HealthLink staff incorporated member suggestions to improve council sustainability. The councils merged to increase intercouncil collaboration, and institutional changes were made in funding to sustain a HealthLink specialist beyond the grant period. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3921904/ /pubmed/24503342 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Basu Roy, Upal
Michel, Tamara
Carpenter, Alison
Lounsbury, David W.
Sabino, Eilleen
Stevenson, Alexis Jurow
Combs, Sarah
Jacobs, Jasmine
Padgett, Deborah
Rapkin, Bruce D.
Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title_full Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title_fullStr Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title_full_unstemmed Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title_short Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
title_sort community-led cancer action councils in queens, new york: process evaluation of an innovative partnership with the queens library system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24503342
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176
work_keys_str_mv AT basuroyupal communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT micheltamara communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT carpenteralison communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT lounsburydavidw communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT sabinoeilleen communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT stevensonalexisjurow communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT combssarah communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT jacobsjasmine communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT padgettdeborah communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem
AT rapkinbruced communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem