Cargando…
Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System
INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnershi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24503342 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176 |
_version_ | 1782303374571470848 |
---|---|
author | Basu Roy, Upal Michel, Tamara Carpenter, Alison Lounsbury, David W. Sabino, Eilleen Stevenson, Alexis Jurow Combs, Sarah Jacobs, Jasmine Padgett, Deborah Rapkin, Bruce D. |
author_facet | Basu Roy, Upal Michel, Tamara Carpenter, Alison Lounsbury, David W. Sabino, Eilleen Stevenson, Alexis Jurow Combs, Sarah Jacobs, Jasmine Padgett, Deborah Rapkin, Bruce D. |
author_sort | Basu Roy, Upal |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnership, Queens Library HealthLink, which aimed to reduce cancer disparities through neighborhood groups (Cancer Action Councils) that convened in public libraries in Queens, New York. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to conduct 69 telephone survey interviews and 4 focus groups (15 participants) with Cancer Action Council members. We used 4 performance criteria to inform data collection: action or attention to sustainability, library support for the council, social cohesion and group leadership, and activity level. Focus group transcripts were independently coded and cross-checked for consensus until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Members reported benefits and barriers to participation. Thirty-three original focus group transcript codes were organized into 8 main themes related to member experiences: 1) library as a needed resource, 2) library as a reputable and nondenominational institution, 3) value of library staff, 4) need for a HealthLink specialist, 5) generation of ideas and coordination of tasks, 6) participation challenges, 7) use of community connections, and 8) collaboration for sustainability. CONCLUSION: In response to the process evaluation, Cancer Action Council members and HealthLink staff incorporated member suggestions to improve council sustainability. The councils merged to increase intercouncil collaboration, and institutional changes were made in funding to sustain a HealthLink specialist beyond the grant period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3921904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39219042014-02-24 Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System Basu Roy, Upal Michel, Tamara Carpenter, Alison Lounsbury, David W. Sabino, Eilleen Stevenson, Alexis Jurow Combs, Sarah Jacobs, Jasmine Padgett, Deborah Rapkin, Bruce D. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has great potential to address cancer disparities, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse and underserved neighborhoods. The objective of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of an innovative academic–community partnership, Queens Library HealthLink, which aimed to reduce cancer disparities through neighborhood groups (Cancer Action Councils) that convened in public libraries in Queens, New York. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to conduct 69 telephone survey interviews and 4 focus groups (15 participants) with Cancer Action Council members. We used 4 performance criteria to inform data collection: action or attention to sustainability, library support for the council, social cohesion and group leadership, and activity level. Focus group transcripts were independently coded and cross-checked for consensus until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Members reported benefits and barriers to participation. Thirty-three original focus group transcript codes were organized into 8 main themes related to member experiences: 1) library as a needed resource, 2) library as a reputable and nondenominational institution, 3) value of library staff, 4) need for a HealthLink specialist, 5) generation of ideas and coordination of tasks, 6) participation challenges, 7) use of community connections, and 8) collaboration for sustainability. CONCLUSION: In response to the process evaluation, Cancer Action Council members and HealthLink staff incorporated member suggestions to improve council sustainability. The councils merged to increase intercouncil collaboration, and institutional changes were made in funding to sustain a HealthLink specialist beyond the grant period. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3921904/ /pubmed/24503342 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Basu Roy, Upal Michel, Tamara Carpenter, Alison Lounsbury, David W. Sabino, Eilleen Stevenson, Alexis Jurow Combs, Sarah Jacobs, Jasmine Padgett, Deborah Rapkin, Bruce D. Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title | Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title_full | Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title_fullStr | Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title_full_unstemmed | Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title_short | Community-Led Cancer Action Councils in Queens, New York: Process Evaluation of an Innovative Partnership With the Queens Library System |
title_sort | community-led cancer action councils in queens, new york: process evaluation of an innovative partnership with the queens library system |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24503342 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT basuroyupal communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT micheltamara communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT carpenteralison communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT lounsburydavidw communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT sabinoeilleen communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT stevensonalexisjurow communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT combssarah communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT jacobsjasmine communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT padgettdeborah communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem AT rapkinbruced communityledcanceractioncouncilsinqueensnewyorkprocessevaluationofaninnovativepartnershipwiththequeenslibrarysystem |