Cargando…

The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing

Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhangin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baláš, Jiří, Panáčková, Michaela, Strejcová, Barbora, Martin, Andrew J., Cochrane, Darryl J., Kaláb, Miloš, Kodejška, Jan, Draper, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387
_version_ 1782303391569936384
author Baláš, Jiří
Panáčková, Michaela
Strejcová, Barbora
Martin, Andrew J.
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Kaláb, Miloš
Kodejška, Jan
Draper, Nick
author_facet Baláš, Jiří
Panáčková, Michaela
Strejcová, Barbora
Martin, Andrew J.
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Kaláb, Miloš
Kodejška, Jan
Draper, Nick
author_sort Baláš, Jiří
collection PubMed
description Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhanging) inclination and speed 25 movements·min(−1). A maximal test was undertaken on a similar circuit at the same speed with inclination increasing by 10° for each successive 3 min stage. Results. Mean oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) increased with wall inclination and climbers reached a mean (±SD) peak [Formula: see text] of 40.3 ± 3.5 mL·kg(−1) ·min(−1) during the maximal test. Self-reported climbing ability was negatively correlated with [Formula: see text] and HR during the submaximal test at 90° ([Formula: see text] , r = −0.82; HR, and r = −0.66) and at 105° ([Formula: see text] , r = −0.84; HR, and r = −0.78) suggesting an increased exercise economy for climbers with a higher ability level. Conclusion. Findings from this study indicate that there is a relationship between wall inclination and the physiological demand of a climb. However, the increased technical ability and fitness of higher level climbers appears to an extent to offset the increased demand through improved exercise economy which in turn leads to an increased time to exhaustion and an improvement in performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39219972014-03-02 The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing Baláš, Jiří Panáčková, Michaela Strejcová, Barbora Martin, Andrew J. Cochrane, Darryl J. Kaláb, Miloš Kodejška, Jan Draper, Nick ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhanging) inclination and speed 25 movements·min(−1). A maximal test was undertaken on a similar circuit at the same speed with inclination increasing by 10° for each successive 3 min stage. Results. Mean oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) increased with wall inclination and climbers reached a mean (±SD) peak [Formula: see text] of 40.3 ± 3.5 mL·kg(−1) ·min(−1) during the maximal test. Self-reported climbing ability was negatively correlated with [Formula: see text] and HR during the submaximal test at 90° ([Formula: see text] , r = −0.82; HR, and r = −0.66) and at 105° ([Formula: see text] , r = −0.84; HR, and r = −0.78) suggesting an increased exercise economy for climbers with a higher ability level. Conclusion. Findings from this study indicate that there is a relationship between wall inclination and the physiological demand of a climb. However, the increased technical ability and fitness of higher level climbers appears to an extent to offset the increased demand through improved exercise economy which in turn leads to an increased time to exhaustion and an improvement in performance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3921997/ /pubmed/24587742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jiří Baláš et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baláš, Jiří
Panáčková, Michaela
Strejcová, Barbora
Martin, Andrew J.
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Kaláb, Miloš
Kodejška, Jan
Draper, Nick
The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_full The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_fullStr The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_short The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_sort relationship between climbing ability and physiological responses to rock climbing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387
work_keys_str_mv AT balasjiri therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT panackovamichaela therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT strejcovabarbora therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT martinandrewj therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT cochranedarrylj therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT kalabmilos therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT kodejskajan therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT drapernick therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT balasjiri relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT panackovamichaela relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT strejcovabarbora relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT martinandrewj relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT cochranedarrylj relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT kalabmilos relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT kodejskajan relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT drapernick relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing