Cargando…

Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation

PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keadle, Sarah Kozey, Lyden, Kate, Hickey, Amanda, Ray, Evan L, Fowke, Jay H, Freedson, Patty S, Matthews, Charles E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12
_version_ 1782303416303747072
author Keadle, Sarah Kozey
Lyden, Kate
Hickey, Amanda
Ray, Evan L
Fowke, Jay H
Freedson, Patty S
Matthews, Charles E
author_facet Keadle, Sarah Kozey
Lyden, Kate
Hickey, Amanda
Ray, Evan L
Fowke, Jay H
Freedson, Patty S
Matthews, Charles E
author_sort Keadle, Sarah Kozey
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to compare PDR estimates of location and purpose to direct observation (DO). METHODS: Fifteen adult (18–75 y) and 15 adolescent (12–17 y) participants were directly observed during at least one segment of the day (i.e., morning, afternoon or evening). Participants completed their normal daily routine while trained observers recorded the location (i.e., home, community, work/school), purpose (e.g., leisure, transportation) and whether the behavior was sedentary or active. The day following the observation, participants completed an unannounced PDR. Estimates of time in each context were compared between PDR and DO. Intra-class correlations (ICC), percent agreement and Kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: For adults, percent agreement was 85% or greater for each location and ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.96. The PDR-reported purpose of adults’ behaviors were highly correlated with DO for household activities and work (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively). Transportation was not significantly correlated with DO (ICC = -0.08). For adolescents, reported classification of activity location was 80.8% or greater. The ICCs for purpose of adolescents’ behaviors ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. Participants were most accurate in classifying the location and purpose of the behaviors in which they spent the most time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adults and adolescents can accurately report where and why they spend time in behaviors using a PDR. This information on behavioral context is essential for translating the evidence for specific behavior-disease associations to health interventions and public policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3922158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39221582014-02-13 Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation Keadle, Sarah Kozey Lyden, Kate Hickey, Amanda Ray, Evan L Fowke, Jay H Freedson, Patty S Matthews, Charles E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to compare PDR estimates of location and purpose to direct observation (DO). METHODS: Fifteen adult (18–75 y) and 15 adolescent (12–17 y) participants were directly observed during at least one segment of the day (i.e., morning, afternoon or evening). Participants completed their normal daily routine while trained observers recorded the location (i.e., home, community, work/school), purpose (e.g., leisure, transportation) and whether the behavior was sedentary or active. The day following the observation, participants completed an unannounced PDR. Estimates of time in each context were compared between PDR and DO. Intra-class correlations (ICC), percent agreement and Kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: For adults, percent agreement was 85% or greater for each location and ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.96. The PDR-reported purpose of adults’ behaviors were highly correlated with DO for household activities and work (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively). Transportation was not significantly correlated with DO (ICC = -0.08). For adolescents, reported classification of activity location was 80.8% or greater. The ICCs for purpose of adolescents’ behaviors ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. Participants were most accurate in classifying the location and purpose of the behaviors in which they spent the most time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adults and adolescents can accurately report where and why they spend time in behaviors using a PDR. This information on behavioral context is essential for translating the evidence for specific behavior-disease associations to health interventions and public policy. BioMed Central 2014-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3922158/ /pubmed/24490619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12 Text en Copyright © 2014 Keadle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Keadle, Sarah Kozey
Lyden, Kate
Hickey, Amanda
Ray, Evan L
Fowke, Jay H
Freedson, Patty S
Matthews, Charles E
Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title_full Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title_fullStr Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title_short Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
title_sort validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12
work_keys_str_mv AT keadlesarahkozey validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT lydenkate validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT hickeyamanda validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT rayevanl validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT fowkejayh validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT freedsonpattys validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation
AT matthewscharlese validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation