Cargando…
Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation
PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12 |
_version_ | 1782303416303747072 |
---|---|
author | Keadle, Sarah Kozey Lyden, Kate Hickey, Amanda Ray, Evan L Fowke, Jay H Freedson, Patty S Matthews, Charles E |
author_facet | Keadle, Sarah Kozey Lyden, Kate Hickey, Amanda Ray, Evan L Fowke, Jay H Freedson, Patty S Matthews, Charles E |
author_sort | Keadle, Sarah Kozey |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to compare PDR estimates of location and purpose to direct observation (DO). METHODS: Fifteen adult (18–75 y) and 15 adolescent (12–17 y) participants were directly observed during at least one segment of the day (i.e., morning, afternoon or evening). Participants completed their normal daily routine while trained observers recorded the location (i.e., home, community, work/school), purpose (e.g., leisure, transportation) and whether the behavior was sedentary or active. The day following the observation, participants completed an unannounced PDR. Estimates of time in each context were compared between PDR and DO. Intra-class correlations (ICC), percent agreement and Kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: For adults, percent agreement was 85% or greater for each location and ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.96. The PDR-reported purpose of adults’ behaviors were highly correlated with DO for household activities and work (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively). Transportation was not significantly correlated with DO (ICC = -0.08). For adolescents, reported classification of activity location was 80.8% or greater. The ICCs for purpose of adolescents’ behaviors ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. Participants were most accurate in classifying the location and purpose of the behaviors in which they spent the most time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adults and adolescents can accurately report where and why they spend time in behaviors using a PDR. This information on behavioral context is essential for translating the evidence for specific behavior-disease associations to health interventions and public policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3922158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39221582014-02-13 Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation Keadle, Sarah Kozey Lyden, Kate Hickey, Amanda Ray, Evan L Fowke, Jay H Freedson, Patty S Matthews, Charles E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research PURPOSE: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR’s for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to compare PDR estimates of location and purpose to direct observation (DO). METHODS: Fifteen adult (18–75 y) and 15 adolescent (12–17 y) participants were directly observed during at least one segment of the day (i.e., morning, afternoon or evening). Participants completed their normal daily routine while trained observers recorded the location (i.e., home, community, work/school), purpose (e.g., leisure, transportation) and whether the behavior was sedentary or active. The day following the observation, participants completed an unannounced PDR. Estimates of time in each context were compared between PDR and DO. Intra-class correlations (ICC), percent agreement and Kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: For adults, percent agreement was 85% or greater for each location and ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.96. The PDR-reported purpose of adults’ behaviors were highly correlated with DO for household activities and work (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively). Transportation was not significantly correlated with DO (ICC = -0.08). For adolescents, reported classification of activity location was 80.8% or greater. The ICCs for purpose of adolescents’ behaviors ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. Participants were most accurate in classifying the location and purpose of the behaviors in which they spent the most time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adults and adolescents can accurately report where and why they spend time in behaviors using a PDR. This information on behavioral context is essential for translating the evidence for specific behavior-disease associations to health interventions and public policy. BioMed Central 2014-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3922158/ /pubmed/24490619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12 Text en Copyright © 2014 Keadle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Keadle, Sarah Kozey Lyden, Kate Hickey, Amanda Ray, Evan L Fowke, Jay H Freedson, Patty S Matthews, Charles E Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title | Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title_full | Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title_fullStr | Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title_short | Validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
title_sort | validation of a previous day recall for measuring the location and purpose of active and sedentary behaviors compared to direct observation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keadlesarahkozey validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT lydenkate validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT hickeyamanda validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT rayevanl validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT fowkejayh validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT freedsonpattys validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation AT matthewscharlese validationofapreviousdayrecallformeasuringthelocationandpurposeofactiveandsedentarybehaviorscomparedtodirectobservation |