Cargando…
The fiduciary obligation of the physician-researcher in phase IV trials
BACKGROUND: In this manuscript, we argue that within the context of phase IV, physician-researchers retain their fiduciary obligation to treat the patient-participants. DISCUSSION: We first clarify why the perspective that research ethics ought to be differentiated from clinical ethics is not applic...
Autores principales: | Bernabe, Rosemarie DLC, van Thiel, Ghislaine JMW, Raaijmakers, Jan AM, van Delden, Johannes JM |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24507449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-11 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Phase IV non-inferiority trials and additional claims of benefit
por: Bernabe, Rosemarie DLC, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The risk-benefit task of research ethics committees: An evaluation of current approaches and the need to incorporate decision studies methods
por: Bernabe, Rosemarie D L C, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust
por: Muller, Sam H. A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
American physicians and dual loyalty obligations in the "war on terror"
por: Singh, Jerome Amir
Publicado: (2003) -
The social value of clinical research
por: Habets, Michelle GJL, et al.
Publicado: (2014)