Cargando…

Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood

BACKGROUND: The introduction of benchtop sequencers has made adoption of whole genome sequencing possible for a broader community of researchers than ever before. Concurrently, metagenomic sequencing (MGS) is rapidly emerging as a tool for interrogating complex samples that defy conventional analyse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frey, Kenneth G, Herrera-Galeano, Jesus Enrique, Redden, Cassie L, Luu, Truong V, Servetas, Stephanie L, Mateczun, Alfred J, Mokashi, Vishwesh P, Bishop-Lilly, Kimberly A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-96
_version_ 1782303465213526016
author Frey, Kenneth G
Herrera-Galeano, Jesus Enrique
Redden, Cassie L
Luu, Truong V
Servetas, Stephanie L
Mateczun, Alfred J
Mokashi, Vishwesh P
Bishop-Lilly, Kimberly A
author_facet Frey, Kenneth G
Herrera-Galeano, Jesus Enrique
Redden, Cassie L
Luu, Truong V
Servetas, Stephanie L
Mateczun, Alfred J
Mokashi, Vishwesh P
Bishop-Lilly, Kimberly A
author_sort Frey, Kenneth G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of benchtop sequencers has made adoption of whole genome sequencing possible for a broader community of researchers than ever before. Concurrently, metagenomic sequencing (MGS) is rapidly emerging as a tool for interrogating complex samples that defy conventional analyses. In addition, next-generation sequencers are increasingly being used in clinical or related settings, for instance to track outbreaks. However, information regarding the analytical sensitivity or limit of detection (LoD) of benchtop sequencers is currently lacking. Furthermore, the specificity of sequence information at or near the LoD is unknown. RESULTS: In the present study, we assess the ability of three next-generation sequencing platforms to identify a pathogen (viral or bacterial) present in low titers in a clinically relevant sample (blood). Our results indicate that the Roche-454 Titanium platform is capable of detecting Dengue virus at titers as low as 1X10(2.5) pfu/mL, corresponding to an estimated 5.4X10(4) genome copies/ml maximum. The increased throughput of the benchtop sequencers, the Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina MiSeq platforms, enabled detection of viral genomes at concentrations as low as 1X10(4) genome copies/mL. Platform-specific biases were evident in sequence read distributions as well as viral genome coverage. For bacterial samples, only the MiSeq platform was able to provide sequencing reads that could be unambiguously classified as originating from Bacillus anthracis. CONCLUSION: The analytical sensitivity of all three platforms approaches that of standard qPCR assays. Although all platforms were able to detect pathogens at the levels tested, there were several noteworthy differences. The Roche-454 Titanium platform produced consistently longer reads, even when compared with the latest chemistry updates for the PGM platform. The MiSeq platform produced consistently greater depth and breadth of coverage, while the Ion Torrent was unequaled for speed of sequencing. None of the platforms were able to verify a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for antiviral resistance in an Influenza A strain isolated from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Overall, the benchtop platforms perform well for identification of pathogens from a representative clinical sample. However, unlike identification, characterization of pathogens is likely to require higher titers, multiple libraries and/or multiple sequencing runs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3922542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39225422014-02-27 Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood Frey, Kenneth G Herrera-Galeano, Jesus Enrique Redden, Cassie L Luu, Truong V Servetas, Stephanie L Mateczun, Alfred J Mokashi, Vishwesh P Bishop-Lilly, Kimberly A BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The introduction of benchtop sequencers has made adoption of whole genome sequencing possible for a broader community of researchers than ever before. Concurrently, metagenomic sequencing (MGS) is rapidly emerging as a tool for interrogating complex samples that defy conventional analyses. In addition, next-generation sequencers are increasingly being used in clinical or related settings, for instance to track outbreaks. However, information regarding the analytical sensitivity or limit of detection (LoD) of benchtop sequencers is currently lacking. Furthermore, the specificity of sequence information at or near the LoD is unknown. RESULTS: In the present study, we assess the ability of three next-generation sequencing platforms to identify a pathogen (viral or bacterial) present in low titers in a clinically relevant sample (blood). Our results indicate that the Roche-454 Titanium platform is capable of detecting Dengue virus at titers as low as 1X10(2.5) pfu/mL, corresponding to an estimated 5.4X10(4) genome copies/ml maximum. The increased throughput of the benchtop sequencers, the Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina MiSeq platforms, enabled detection of viral genomes at concentrations as low as 1X10(4) genome copies/mL. Platform-specific biases were evident in sequence read distributions as well as viral genome coverage. For bacterial samples, only the MiSeq platform was able to provide sequencing reads that could be unambiguously classified as originating from Bacillus anthracis. CONCLUSION: The analytical sensitivity of all three platforms approaches that of standard qPCR assays. Although all platforms were able to detect pathogens at the levels tested, there were several noteworthy differences. The Roche-454 Titanium platform produced consistently longer reads, even when compared with the latest chemistry updates for the PGM platform. The MiSeq platform produced consistently greater depth and breadth of coverage, while the Ion Torrent was unequaled for speed of sequencing. None of the platforms were able to verify a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for antiviral resistance in an Influenza A strain isolated from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Overall, the benchtop platforms perform well for identification of pathogens from a representative clinical sample. However, unlike identification, characterization of pathogens is likely to require higher titers, multiple libraries and/or multiple sequencing runs. BioMed Central 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3922542/ /pubmed/24495417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-96 Text en Copyright © 2014 Frey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Frey, Kenneth G
Herrera-Galeano, Jesus Enrique
Redden, Cassie L
Luu, Truong V
Servetas, Stephanie L
Mateczun, Alfred J
Mokashi, Vishwesh P
Bishop-Lilly, Kimberly A
Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title_full Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title_fullStr Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title_short Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
title_sort comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-96
work_keys_str_mv AT freykennethg comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT herreragaleanojesusenrique comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT reddencassiel comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT luutruongv comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT servetasstephaniel comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT mateczunalfredj comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT mokashivishweshp comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood
AT bishoplillykimberlya comparisonofthreenextgenerationsequencingplatformsformetagenomicsequencingandidentificationofpathogensinblood