Cargando…

Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses

BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of different imaging options and the most efficient imaging strategy for treatment planning of patients with hip prostheses. METHODS: The planning kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) studies for three prostate cancer patients with bilateral hip p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, David, Smith, Shaun, Barnett, Rob, Bauman, Glenn, Yartsev, Slav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24491230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-43
_version_ 1782303465921314816
author Chapman, David
Smith, Shaun
Barnett, Rob
Bauman, Glenn
Yartsev, Slav
author_facet Chapman, David
Smith, Shaun
Barnett, Rob
Bauman, Glenn
Yartsev, Slav
author_sort Chapman, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of different imaging options and the most efficient imaging strategy for treatment planning of patients with hip prostheses. METHODS: The planning kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) studies for three prostate cancer patients with bilateral hip prostheses were used for creating hybrid kVCT/MVCT image sets. Treatment plans were created for kVCT images alone, hybrid kVCT/MVCT images, and MVCT images alone using the same dose prescription and planning parameters. The resulting dose volume histograms were compared. The orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) reconstruction tool for kVCT images and different MVCT options were investigated with a water tank fit with double hip prostheses. Treatment plans were created for all imaging options and calculated dose was compared with the one measured by a pin-point ion chamber. RESULTS: On average for three patients, the D(35%) for the bladder was 8% higher in plans based on MVCT images and 7% higher in plans based on hybrid images, compared to the plans based on kVCT images alone. Likewise, the D(35%) for the rectum was 3% higher than the kVCT based plan for both hybrid and MVCT plans. The average difference in planned D99% in the PTV compared to kVCT plans was 0.9% and 0.1% for MVCT and hybrid plans, respectively. For the water tank with hip prostheses phantom, the kVCT plan with O-MAR correction applied showed better agreement between the measured and calculated dose than the original image set, with a difference of -1.9% compared to 3.3%. The measured doses for the MVCT plans were lower than the calculated dose due to image size limitations. The best agreement was for the kVCT/MVCT hybrid plans with the difference between calculated and measured dose around 1%. CONCLUSION: MVCT image provides better visualization of patient anatomy and hybrid kVCT/MVCT study enables more accurate calculations using updated MVCT relative electron density calibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3922545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39225452014-02-13 Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses Chapman, David Smith, Shaun Barnett, Rob Bauman, Glenn Yartsev, Slav Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To determine the effect of different imaging options and the most efficient imaging strategy for treatment planning of patients with hip prostheses. METHODS: The planning kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) studies for three prostate cancer patients with bilateral hip prostheses were used for creating hybrid kVCT/MVCT image sets. Treatment plans were created for kVCT images alone, hybrid kVCT/MVCT images, and MVCT images alone using the same dose prescription and planning parameters. The resulting dose volume histograms were compared. The orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) reconstruction tool for kVCT images and different MVCT options were investigated with a water tank fit with double hip prostheses. Treatment plans were created for all imaging options and calculated dose was compared with the one measured by a pin-point ion chamber. RESULTS: On average for three patients, the D(35%) for the bladder was 8% higher in plans based on MVCT images and 7% higher in plans based on hybrid images, compared to the plans based on kVCT images alone. Likewise, the D(35%) for the rectum was 3% higher than the kVCT based plan for both hybrid and MVCT plans. The average difference in planned D99% in the PTV compared to kVCT plans was 0.9% and 0.1% for MVCT and hybrid plans, respectively. For the water tank with hip prostheses phantom, the kVCT plan with O-MAR correction applied showed better agreement between the measured and calculated dose than the original image set, with a difference of -1.9% compared to 3.3%. The measured doses for the MVCT plans were lower than the calculated dose due to image size limitations. The best agreement was for the kVCT/MVCT hybrid plans with the difference between calculated and measured dose around 1%. CONCLUSION: MVCT image provides better visualization of patient anatomy and hybrid kVCT/MVCT study enables more accurate calculations using updated MVCT relative electron density calibration. BioMed Central 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3922545/ /pubmed/24491230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-43 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chapman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chapman, David
Smith, Shaun
Barnett, Rob
Bauman, Glenn
Yartsev, Slav
Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title_full Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title_fullStr Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title_short Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
title_sort optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24491230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-43
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmandavid optimizationoftomotherapytreatmentplanningforpatientswithbilateralhipprostheses
AT smithshaun optimizationoftomotherapytreatmentplanningforpatientswithbilateralhipprostheses
AT barnettrob optimizationoftomotherapytreatmentplanningforpatientswithbilateralhipprostheses
AT baumanglenn optimizationoftomotherapytreatmentplanningforpatientswithbilateralhipprostheses
AT yartsevslav optimizationoftomotherapytreatmentplanningforpatientswithbilateralhipprostheses