Cargando…

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

BACKGROUND: Analyzing time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from treatment exposure contributes to meeting pharmacovigilance objectives, i.e. identification and prevention. Post-marketing data are available from reporting systems. Times-to-onset from such databases are right-truncated because some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leroy, Fanny, Dauxois, Jean-Yves, Théophile, Hélène, Haramburu, Françoise, Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-17
_version_ 1782303595839881216
author Leroy, Fanny
Dauxois, Jean-Yves
Théophile, Hélène
Haramburu, Françoise
Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
author_facet Leroy, Fanny
Dauxois, Jean-Yves
Théophile, Hélène
Haramburu, Françoise
Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
author_sort Leroy, Fanny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analyzing time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from treatment exposure contributes to meeting pharmacovigilance objectives, i.e. identification and prevention. Post-marketing data are available from reporting systems. Times-to-onset from such databases are right-truncated because some patients who were exposed to the drug and who will eventually develop the adverse drug reaction may do it after the time of analysis and thus are not included in the data. Acknowledgment of the developments adapted to right-truncated data is not widespread and these methods have never been used in pharmacovigilance. We assess the use of appropriate methods as well as the consequences of not taking right truncation into account (naive approach) on parametric maximum likelihood estimation of time-to-onset distribution. METHODS: Both approaches, naive or taking right truncation into account, were compared with a simulation study. We used twelve scenarios for the exponential distribution and twenty-four for the Weibull and log-logistic distributions. These scenarios are defined by a set of parameters: the parameters of the time-to-onset distribution, the probability of this distribution falling within an observable values interval and the sample size. An application to reported lymphoma after anti TNF- α treatment from the French pharmacovigilance is presented. RESULTS: The simulation study shows that the bias and the mean squared error might in some instances be unacceptably large when right truncation is not considered while the truncation-based estimator shows always better and often satisfactory performances and the gap may be large. For the real dataset, the estimated expected time-to-onset leads to a minimum difference of 58 weeks between both approaches, which is not negligible. This difference is obtained for the Weibull model, under which the estimated probability of this distribution falling within an observable values interval is not far from 1. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to take right truncation into account for estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3923259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39232592014-03-04 Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases Leroy, Fanny Dauxois, Jean-Yves Théophile, Hélène Haramburu, Françoise Tubert-Bitter, Pascale BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Analyzing time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from treatment exposure contributes to meeting pharmacovigilance objectives, i.e. identification and prevention. Post-marketing data are available from reporting systems. Times-to-onset from such databases are right-truncated because some patients who were exposed to the drug and who will eventually develop the adverse drug reaction may do it after the time of analysis and thus are not included in the data. Acknowledgment of the developments adapted to right-truncated data is not widespread and these methods have never been used in pharmacovigilance. We assess the use of appropriate methods as well as the consequences of not taking right truncation into account (naive approach) on parametric maximum likelihood estimation of time-to-onset distribution. METHODS: Both approaches, naive or taking right truncation into account, were compared with a simulation study. We used twelve scenarios for the exponential distribution and twenty-four for the Weibull and log-logistic distributions. These scenarios are defined by a set of parameters: the parameters of the time-to-onset distribution, the probability of this distribution falling within an observable values interval and the sample size. An application to reported lymphoma after anti TNF- α treatment from the French pharmacovigilance is presented. RESULTS: The simulation study shows that the bias and the mean squared error might in some instances be unacceptably large when right truncation is not considered while the truncation-based estimator shows always better and often satisfactory performances and the gap may be large. For the real dataset, the estimated expected time-to-onset leads to a minimum difference of 58 weeks between both approaches, which is not negligible. This difference is obtained for the Weibull model, under which the estimated probability of this distribution falling within an observable values interval is not far from 1. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to take right truncation into account for estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases. BioMed Central 2014-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3923259/ /pubmed/24490673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Leroy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leroy, Fanny
Dauxois, Jean-Yves
Théophile, Hélène
Haramburu, Françoise
Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title_full Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title_fullStr Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title_full_unstemmed Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title_short Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
title_sort estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-17
work_keys_str_mv AT leroyfanny estimatingtimetoonsetofadversedrugreactionsfromspontaneousreportingdatabases
AT dauxoisjeanyves estimatingtimetoonsetofadversedrugreactionsfromspontaneousreportingdatabases
AT theophilehelene estimatingtimetoonsetofadversedrugreactionsfromspontaneousreportingdatabases
AT haramburufrancoise estimatingtimetoonsetofadversedrugreactionsfromspontaneousreportingdatabases
AT tubertbitterpascale estimatingtimetoonsetofadversedrugreactionsfromspontaneousreportingdatabases