Cargando…

Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)

BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes are frequently advocated for the management of musculoskeletal disorders; however, adherence is an important pre-requisite for their success. The assessment of exercise adherence requires the use of relevant and appropriate measures, but guidance for appropriate asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holden, Melanie A, Haywood, Kirstie L, Potia, Tanzila A, Gee, Melanie, McLean, Sionnadh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-10
_version_ 1782303614149066752
author Holden, Melanie A
Haywood, Kirstie L
Potia, Tanzila A
Gee, Melanie
McLean, Sionnadh
author_facet Holden, Melanie A
Haywood, Kirstie L
Potia, Tanzila A
Gee, Melanie
McLean, Sionnadh
author_sort Holden, Melanie A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes are frequently advocated for the management of musculoskeletal disorders; however, adherence is an important pre-requisite for their success. The assessment of exercise adherence requires the use of relevant and appropriate measures, but guidance for appropriate assessment does not exist. This research will identify and evaluate the quality and acceptability of all measures used to assess exercise adherence within a musculoskeletal setting, seeking to reach consensus for the most relevant and appropriate measures for application in research and/or clinical practice settings. METHODS/DESIGN: There are two key stages to the proposed research. First, a systematic review of the quality and acceptability of measures used to assess exercise adherence in musculoskeletal disorders; second, a consensus meeting. The systematic review will be conducted in two phases and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a robust methodology. Phase one will identify all measures that have been used to assess exercise adherence in a musculoskeletal setting. Phase two will seek to identify published and unpublished evidence of the measurement and practical properties of identified measures. Study quality will be assessed against the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. A shortlist of best quality measures will be produced for consideration during stage two: a meeting of relevant stakeholders in the United Kingdom during which consensus on the most relevant and appropriate measures of exercise adherence for application in research and/or clinical practice settings will be sought. DISCUSSION: This study will benefit clinicians who seek to evaluate patients’ levels of exercise adherence and those intending to undertake research, service evaluation, or audit relating to exercise adherence in the musculoskeletal field. The findings will impact upon new research studies which aim to understand the factors that predict adherence with exercise and which test different adherence-enhancing interventions. PROSPERO reference: CRD42013006212
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3923391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39233912014-02-14 Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol) Holden, Melanie A Haywood, Kirstie L Potia, Tanzila A Gee, Melanie McLean, Sionnadh Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes are frequently advocated for the management of musculoskeletal disorders; however, adherence is an important pre-requisite for their success. The assessment of exercise adherence requires the use of relevant and appropriate measures, but guidance for appropriate assessment does not exist. This research will identify and evaluate the quality and acceptability of all measures used to assess exercise adherence within a musculoskeletal setting, seeking to reach consensus for the most relevant and appropriate measures for application in research and/or clinical practice settings. METHODS/DESIGN: There are two key stages to the proposed research. First, a systematic review of the quality and acceptability of measures used to assess exercise adherence in musculoskeletal disorders; second, a consensus meeting. The systematic review will be conducted in two phases and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a robust methodology. Phase one will identify all measures that have been used to assess exercise adherence in a musculoskeletal setting. Phase two will seek to identify published and unpublished evidence of the measurement and practical properties of identified measures. Study quality will be assessed against the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. A shortlist of best quality measures will be produced for consideration during stage two: a meeting of relevant stakeholders in the United Kingdom during which consensus on the most relevant and appropriate measures of exercise adherence for application in research and/or clinical practice settings will be sought. DISCUSSION: This study will benefit clinicians who seek to evaluate patients’ levels of exercise adherence and those intending to undertake research, service evaluation, or audit relating to exercise adherence in the musculoskeletal field. The findings will impact upon new research studies which aim to understand the factors that predict adherence with exercise and which test different adherence-enhancing interventions. PROSPERO reference: CRD42013006212 BioMed Central 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3923391/ /pubmed/24512976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Holden et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Holden, Melanie A
Haywood, Kirstie L
Potia, Tanzila A
Gee, Melanie
McLean, Sionnadh
Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title_full Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title_fullStr Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title_short Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
title_sort recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: a systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-10
work_keys_str_mv AT holdenmelaniea recommendationsforexerciseadherencemeasuresinmusculoskeletalsettingsasystematicreviewandconsensusmeetingprotocol
AT haywoodkirstiel recommendationsforexerciseadherencemeasuresinmusculoskeletalsettingsasystematicreviewandconsensusmeetingprotocol
AT potiatanzilaa recommendationsforexerciseadherencemeasuresinmusculoskeletalsettingsasystematicreviewandconsensusmeetingprotocol
AT geemelanie recommendationsforexerciseadherencemeasuresinmusculoskeletalsettingsasystematicreviewandconsensusmeetingprotocol
AT mcleansionnadh recommendationsforexerciseadherencemeasuresinmusculoskeletalsettingsasystematicreviewandconsensusmeetingprotocol