Cargando…

Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection

BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the pas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molins, Claudia R, Delorey, Mark J, Yockey, Brook M, Young, John W, Belisle, John T, Schriefer, Martin E, Petersen, Jeannine M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67
_version_ 1782303617246560256
author Molins, Claudia R
Delorey, Mark J
Yockey, Brook M
Young, John W
Belisle, John T
Schriefer, Martin E
Petersen, Jeannine M
author_facet Molins, Claudia R
Delorey, Mark J
Yockey, Brook M
Young, John W
Belisle, John T
Schriefer, Martin E
Petersen, Jeannine M
author_sort Molins, Claudia R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S(4) belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S(4) in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S(4) at drop point. RESULTS: Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S(4) strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S(4) or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from using Schu S(4) as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3923427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39234272014-02-14 Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection Molins, Claudia R Delorey, Mark J Yockey, Brook M Young, John W Belisle, John T Schriefer, Martin E Petersen, Jeannine M BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S(4) belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S(4) in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S(4) at drop point. RESULTS: Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S(4) strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S(4) or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from using Schu S(4) as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results. BioMed Central 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3923427/ /pubmed/24502661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67 Text en Copyright © 2014 Molins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Molins, Claudia R
Delorey, Mark J
Yockey, Brook M
Young, John W
Belisle, John T
Schriefer, Martin E
Petersen, Jeannine M
Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title_full Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title_fullStr Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title_full_unstemmed Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title_short Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
title_sort virulence difference between the prototypic schu s(4) strain (a1a) and francisella tularensis a1a, a1b, a2 and type b strains in a murine model of infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67
work_keys_str_mv AT molinsclaudiar virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT deloreymarkj virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT yockeybrookm virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT youngjohnw virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT belislejohnt virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT schriefermartine virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection
AT petersenjeanninem virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection