Cargando…
Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the pas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67 |
_version_ | 1782303617246560256 |
---|---|
author | Molins, Claudia R Delorey, Mark J Yockey, Brook M Young, John W Belisle, John T Schriefer, Martin E Petersen, Jeannine M |
author_facet | Molins, Claudia R Delorey, Mark J Yockey, Brook M Young, John W Belisle, John T Schriefer, Martin E Petersen, Jeannine M |
author_sort | Molins, Claudia R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S(4) belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S(4) in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S(4) at drop point. RESULTS: Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S(4) strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S(4) or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from using Schu S(4) as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3923427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39234272014-02-14 Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection Molins, Claudia R Delorey, Mark J Yockey, Brook M Young, John W Belisle, John T Schriefer, Martin E Petersen, Jeannine M BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S(4) is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S(4) belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis. METHODS: In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S(4) in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S(4) at drop point. RESULTS: Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S(4) strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S(4) or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from using Schu S(4) as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results. BioMed Central 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3923427/ /pubmed/24502661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67 Text en Copyright © 2014 Molins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Molins, Claudia R Delorey, Mark J Yockey, Brook M Young, John W Belisle, John T Schriefer, Martin E Petersen, Jeannine M Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title | Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title_full | Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title_fullStr | Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title_short | Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S(4) strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection |
title_sort | virulence difference between the prototypic schu s(4) strain (a1a) and francisella tularensis a1a, a1b, a2 and type b strains in a murine model of infection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-67 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinsclaudiar virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT deloreymarkj virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT yockeybrookm virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT youngjohnw virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT belislejohnt virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT schriefermartine virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection AT petersenjeanninem virulencedifferencebetweentheprototypicschus4straina1aandfrancisellatularensisa1aa1ba2andtypebstrainsinamurinemodelofinfection |