Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify random...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440 |
_version_ | 1782303657476227072 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Bowen Shi, Jingpu Chen, Xin Ma, Bing Sun, Hao |
author_facet | Yang, Bowen Shi, Jingpu Chen, Xin Ma, Bing Sun, Hao |
author_sort | Yang, Bowen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Outcome of Efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18–4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04–13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30–5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03–23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08–0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47–6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD = −3.11, 95%CI −4.43 to −1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD = −6.25, 95%CI −7.96 to −4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD = −3.47, 95%CI −5.73 to −1.21). CONCLUSIONS: It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3923787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39237872014-02-18 Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials Yang, Bowen Shi, Jingpu Chen, Xin Ma, Bing Sun, Hao PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Outcome of Efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18–4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04–13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30–5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03–23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08–0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47–6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD = −3.11, 95%CI −4.43 to −1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD = −6.25, 95%CI −7.96 to −4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD = −3.47, 95%CI −5.73 to −1.21). CONCLUSIONS: It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction. Public Library of Science 2014-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3923787/ /pubmed/24551100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440 Text en © 2014 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Bowen Shi, Jingpu Chen, Xin Ma, Bing Sun, Hao Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in china: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangbowen efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials AT shijingpu efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenxin efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials AT mabing efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials AT sunhao efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials |