Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Bowen, Shi, Jingpu, Chen, Xin, Ma, Bing, Sun, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440
_version_ 1782303657476227072
author Yang, Bowen
Shi, Jingpu
Chen, Xin
Ma, Bing
Sun, Hao
author_facet Yang, Bowen
Shi, Jingpu
Chen, Xin
Ma, Bing
Sun, Hao
author_sort Yang, Bowen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Outcome of Efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18–4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04–13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30–5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03–23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08–0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47–6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD = −3.11, 95%CI −4.43 to −1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD = −6.25, 95%CI −7.96 to −4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD =  −3.47, 95%CI −5.73 to −1.21). CONCLUSIONS: It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3923787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39237872014-02-18 Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials Yang, Bowen Shi, Jingpu Chen, Xin Ma, Bing Sun, Hao PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Outcome of Efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18–4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04–13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30–5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03–23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08–0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47–6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD = −3.11, 95%CI −4.43 to −1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD = −6.25, 95%CI −7.96 to −4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD =  −3.47, 95%CI −5.73 to −1.21). CONCLUSIONS: It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction. Public Library of Science 2014-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3923787/ /pubmed/24551100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440 Text en © 2014 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Bowen
Shi, Jingpu
Chen, Xin
Ma, Bing
Sun, Hao
Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13289 Patients from 145 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in china: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088440
work_keys_str_mv AT yangbowen efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shijingpu efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenxin efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mabing efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sunhao efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforacuteischemicstrokeinchinaanetworkmetaanalysisof13289patientsfrom145randomizedcontrolledtrials