Cargando…

Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools

When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takahashi, Chie, Watt, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109
_version_ 1782303695523807232
author Takahashi, Chie
Watt, Simon J.
author_facet Takahashi, Chie
Watt, Simon J.
author_sort Takahashi, Chie
collection PubMed
description When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwise be possible. Tools such as pliers and tongs systematically perturb the mapping between object size and the hand opening. This could complicate visual-haptic integration because it may alter the reliability of the haptic signal, thereby disrupting the determination of appropriate signal weights. To investigate this we first measured the reliability of haptic size estimates made with virtual pliers-like tools (created using a stereoscopic display and force-feedback robots) with different “gains” between hand opening and object size. Haptic reliability in tool use was straightforwardly determined by a combination of sensitivity to changes in hand opening and the effects of tool geometry. The precise pattern of sensitivity to hand opening, which violated Weber's law, meant that haptic reliability changed with tool gain. We then examined whether the visuo-motor system accounts for these reliability changes. We measured the weight given to visual and haptic stimuli when both were available, again with different tool gains, by measuring the perceived size of stimuli in which visual and haptic sizes were varied independently. The weight given to each sensory cue changed with tool gain in a manner that closely resembled the predictions of optimal sensory integration. The results are consistent with the idea that different tool geometries are modeled by the brain, allowing it to calculate not only the distal properties of objects felt with tools, but also the certainty with which those properties are known. These findings highlight the flexibility of human sensory integration and tool-use, and potentially provide an approach for optimizing the design of visual-haptic devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3924038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39240382014-03-03 Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools Takahashi, Chie Watt, Simon J. Front Psychol Psychology When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwise be possible. Tools such as pliers and tongs systematically perturb the mapping between object size and the hand opening. This could complicate visual-haptic integration because it may alter the reliability of the haptic signal, thereby disrupting the determination of appropriate signal weights. To investigate this we first measured the reliability of haptic size estimates made with virtual pliers-like tools (created using a stereoscopic display and force-feedback robots) with different “gains” between hand opening and object size. Haptic reliability in tool use was straightforwardly determined by a combination of sensitivity to changes in hand opening and the effects of tool geometry. The precise pattern of sensitivity to hand opening, which violated Weber's law, meant that haptic reliability changed with tool gain. We then examined whether the visuo-motor system accounts for these reliability changes. We measured the weight given to visual and haptic stimuli when both were available, again with different tool gains, by measuring the perceived size of stimuli in which visual and haptic sizes were varied independently. The weight given to each sensory cue changed with tool gain in a manner that closely resembled the predictions of optimal sensory integration. The results are consistent with the idea that different tool geometries are modeled by the brain, allowing it to calculate not only the distal properties of objects felt with tools, but also the certainty with which those properties are known. These findings highlight the flexibility of human sensory integration and tool-use, and potentially provide an approach for optimizing the design of visual-haptic devices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3924038/ /pubmed/24592245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109 Text en Copyright © 2014 Takahashi and Watt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Takahashi, Chie
Watt, Simon J.
Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title_full Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title_fullStr Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title_full_unstemmed Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title_short Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
title_sort visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109
work_keys_str_mv AT takahashichie visualhapticintegrationwithpliersandtongssignalweightstakeaccountofchangesinhapticsensitivitycausedbydifferenttools
AT wattsimonj visualhapticintegrationwithpliersandtongssignalweightstakeaccountofchangesinhapticsensitivitycausedbydifferenttools