Cargando…
Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools
When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwis...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109 |
_version_ | 1782303695523807232 |
---|---|
author | Takahashi, Chie Watt, Simon J. |
author_facet | Takahashi, Chie Watt, Simon J. |
author_sort | Takahashi, Chie |
collection | PubMed |
description | When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwise be possible. Tools such as pliers and tongs systematically perturb the mapping between object size and the hand opening. This could complicate visual-haptic integration because it may alter the reliability of the haptic signal, thereby disrupting the determination of appropriate signal weights. To investigate this we first measured the reliability of haptic size estimates made with virtual pliers-like tools (created using a stereoscopic display and force-feedback robots) with different “gains” between hand opening and object size. Haptic reliability in tool use was straightforwardly determined by a combination of sensitivity to changes in hand opening and the effects of tool geometry. The precise pattern of sensitivity to hand opening, which violated Weber's law, meant that haptic reliability changed with tool gain. We then examined whether the visuo-motor system accounts for these reliability changes. We measured the weight given to visual and haptic stimuli when both were available, again with different tool gains, by measuring the perceived size of stimuli in which visual and haptic sizes were varied independently. The weight given to each sensory cue changed with tool gain in a manner that closely resembled the predictions of optimal sensory integration. The results are consistent with the idea that different tool geometries are modeled by the brain, allowing it to calculate not only the distal properties of objects felt with tools, but also the certainty with which those properties are known. These findings highlight the flexibility of human sensory integration and tool-use, and potentially provide an approach for optimizing the design of visual-haptic devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3924038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39240382014-03-03 Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools Takahashi, Chie Watt, Simon J. Front Psychol Psychology When we hold an object while looking at it, estimates from visual and haptic cues to size are combined in a statistically optimal fashion, whereby the “weight” given to each signal reflects their relative reliabilities. This allows object properties to be estimated more precisely than would otherwise be possible. Tools such as pliers and tongs systematically perturb the mapping between object size and the hand opening. This could complicate visual-haptic integration because it may alter the reliability of the haptic signal, thereby disrupting the determination of appropriate signal weights. To investigate this we first measured the reliability of haptic size estimates made with virtual pliers-like tools (created using a stereoscopic display and force-feedback robots) with different “gains” between hand opening and object size. Haptic reliability in tool use was straightforwardly determined by a combination of sensitivity to changes in hand opening and the effects of tool geometry. The precise pattern of sensitivity to hand opening, which violated Weber's law, meant that haptic reliability changed with tool gain. We then examined whether the visuo-motor system accounts for these reliability changes. We measured the weight given to visual and haptic stimuli when both were available, again with different tool gains, by measuring the perceived size of stimuli in which visual and haptic sizes were varied independently. The weight given to each sensory cue changed with tool gain in a manner that closely resembled the predictions of optimal sensory integration. The results are consistent with the idea that different tool geometries are modeled by the brain, allowing it to calculate not only the distal properties of objects felt with tools, but also the certainty with which those properties are known. These findings highlight the flexibility of human sensory integration and tool-use, and potentially provide an approach for optimizing the design of visual-haptic devices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3924038/ /pubmed/24592245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109 Text en Copyright © 2014 Takahashi and Watt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Takahashi, Chie Watt, Simon J. Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title | Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title_full | Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title_fullStr | Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title_short | Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
title_sort | visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takahashichie visualhapticintegrationwithpliersandtongssignalweightstakeaccountofchangesinhapticsensitivitycausedbydifferenttools AT wattsimonj visualhapticintegrationwithpliersandtongssignalweightstakeaccountofchangesinhapticsensitivitycausedbydifferenttools |