Cargando…

Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?

BACKGROUND: Drumming muscles of some sound-producing fish are ‘champions’ of contraction speed, their rate setting the fundamental frequency. In the piranha, contraction of these muscles at 150 Hz drives a sound at the same frequency. Drumming muscles of different not closely related species show ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millot, Sandie, Parmentier, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24507247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-24
_version_ 1782303738291027968
author Millot, Sandie
Parmentier, Eric
author_facet Millot, Sandie
Parmentier, Eric
author_sort Millot, Sandie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drumming muscles of some sound-producing fish are ‘champions’ of contraction speed, their rate setting the fundamental frequency. In the piranha, contraction of these muscles at 150 Hz drives a sound at the same frequency. Drumming muscles of different not closely related species show evolutionary convergences. Interestingly, some characters of sonic muscles can also be found in the trunk muscles of newly hatched larvae that are able to maintain tail beat frequencies up to 100 Hz. The aim of this work was to study the development of sound production and sonic and epaxial muscles simultaneously in the red bellied piranhas (Pygocentrus nattereri) to seek for possible common characteristics. RESULTS: Call, pulse and period durations increased significantly with the fish size, but the call dominant frequencies decreased, and the number of pulses and the call amplitude formed a bell curve. In epaxial muscles, the fibre diameters of younger fish are first positioned in the graphical slope corresponding to sonic muscles, before diverging. The fibre diameter of older fish trunk muscles was bigger, and the area of the myofibrils was larger than in sonic muscles. Moreover, in two of the biggest fish, the sonic muscles were invaded by fat cells and the sonic muscle ultrastructure was similar to the epaxial one. These two fish were also unable to produce any sound, meaning they lost their ability to contract quickly. CONCLUSIONS: The volume occupied by myofibrils determines the force of contraction, the volume of sarcoplasmic reticulum sets the contraction frequency, and the volume of mitochondria sets the level of sustained performance. The functional outcomes in muscles are all attributable to shifts in the proportions of those structures. A single delay in the development restricts the quantity of myofibrils, maintains a high proportion of space in the sarcoplasm and develops sarcoplasmic reticulum. High-speed sonic muscles could thus be skeletal muscles with delayed development. This hypothesis has the advantage that it could easily explain why high-speed sonic muscles have evolved so many times in different lineages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3924398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39243982014-02-15 Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny? Millot, Sandie Parmentier, Eric BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Drumming muscles of some sound-producing fish are ‘champions’ of contraction speed, their rate setting the fundamental frequency. In the piranha, contraction of these muscles at 150 Hz drives a sound at the same frequency. Drumming muscles of different not closely related species show evolutionary convergences. Interestingly, some characters of sonic muscles can also be found in the trunk muscles of newly hatched larvae that are able to maintain tail beat frequencies up to 100 Hz. The aim of this work was to study the development of sound production and sonic and epaxial muscles simultaneously in the red bellied piranhas (Pygocentrus nattereri) to seek for possible common characteristics. RESULTS: Call, pulse and period durations increased significantly with the fish size, but the call dominant frequencies decreased, and the number of pulses and the call amplitude formed a bell curve. In epaxial muscles, the fibre diameters of younger fish are first positioned in the graphical slope corresponding to sonic muscles, before diverging. The fibre diameter of older fish trunk muscles was bigger, and the area of the myofibrils was larger than in sonic muscles. Moreover, in two of the biggest fish, the sonic muscles were invaded by fat cells and the sonic muscle ultrastructure was similar to the epaxial one. These two fish were also unable to produce any sound, meaning they lost their ability to contract quickly. CONCLUSIONS: The volume occupied by myofibrils determines the force of contraction, the volume of sarcoplasmic reticulum sets the contraction frequency, and the volume of mitochondria sets the level of sustained performance. The functional outcomes in muscles are all attributable to shifts in the proportions of those structures. A single delay in the development restricts the quantity of myofibrils, maintains a high proportion of space in the sarcoplasm and develops sarcoplasmic reticulum. High-speed sonic muscles could thus be skeletal muscles with delayed development. This hypothesis has the advantage that it could easily explain why high-speed sonic muscles have evolved so many times in different lineages. BioMed Central 2014-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3924398/ /pubmed/24507247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-24 Text en Copyright © 2014 Millot and Parmentier; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Millot, Sandie
Parmentier, Eric
Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title_full Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title_fullStr Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title_full_unstemmed Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title_short Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
title_sort development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24507247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-24
work_keys_str_mv AT millotsandie developmentoftheultrastructureofsonicmusclesakindofneoteny
AT parmentiereric developmentoftheultrastructureofsonicmusclesakindofneoteny