Cargando…
Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces
Listeria monocytogenes can adhere to different types of food contact surfaces within a food processing environment. Therefore, environmental sampling devices should be capable of detecting unacceptable contamination. In this study, a sponge-stick, foam spatula and an environmental swab were evaluate...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100804 |
_version_ | 1782303752231845888 |
---|---|
author | Lahou, Evy Uyttendaele, Mieke |
author_facet | Lahou, Evy Uyttendaele, Mieke |
author_sort | Lahou, Evy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Listeria monocytogenes can adhere to different types of food contact surfaces within a food processing environment. Therefore, environmental sampling devices should be capable of detecting unacceptable contamination. In this study, a sponge-stick, foam spatula and an environmental swab were evaluated on their ability to detect low concentrations of L. monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces. A cocktail of four L. monocytogenes serotypes was inoculated with a concentration of 100 CFU/250 cm(2) onto stainless steel (SS), high density polyethylene (HDPE) and rubber surfaces in a 250 cm(2) area. Immediately after inoculation and after 1 h exposure, the surfaces were swabbed with the different swabbing devices. The results of the study show only minor differences in the ability of the swabbing devices to detect L. monocytogenes. All devices were capable to detect the contamination immediately after inoculation. However, when the surfaces were allowed to air-dry for 1 h, L. monocytogenes was undetected in 11.1% of the samples (n = 27) with the sponge stick, in 7.4% of the samples (n = 27) with the foam spatula and in 3.7% of the samples (n = 27) with the environmental swab, especially on SS surfaces. The detection ability of the different devices for L. monocytogenes can be concluded to be rather high on different types of food contact surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3924475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39244752014-02-18 Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces Lahou, Evy Uyttendaele, Mieke Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Listeria monocytogenes can adhere to different types of food contact surfaces within a food processing environment. Therefore, environmental sampling devices should be capable of detecting unacceptable contamination. In this study, a sponge-stick, foam spatula and an environmental swab were evaluated on their ability to detect low concentrations of L. monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces. A cocktail of four L. monocytogenes serotypes was inoculated with a concentration of 100 CFU/250 cm(2) onto stainless steel (SS), high density polyethylene (HDPE) and rubber surfaces in a 250 cm(2) area. Immediately after inoculation and after 1 h exposure, the surfaces were swabbed with the different swabbing devices. The results of the study show only minor differences in the ability of the swabbing devices to detect L. monocytogenes. All devices were capable to detect the contamination immediately after inoculation. However, when the surfaces were allowed to air-dry for 1 h, L. monocytogenes was undetected in 11.1% of the samples (n = 27) with the sponge stick, in 7.4% of the samples (n = 27) with the foam spatula and in 3.7% of the samples (n = 27) with the environmental swab, especially on SS surfaces. The detection ability of the different devices for L. monocytogenes can be concluded to be rather high on different types of food contact surfaces. MDPI 2014-01-08 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3924475/ /pubmed/24406663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100804 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lahou, Evy Uyttendaele, Mieke Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title | Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title_full | Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title_short | Evaluation of Three Swabbing Devices for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes on Different Types of Food Contact Surfaces |
title_sort | evaluation of three swabbing devices for detection of listeria monocytogenes on different types of food contact surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lahouevy evaluationofthreeswabbingdevicesfordetectionoflisteriamonocytogenesondifferenttypesoffoodcontactsurfaces AT uyttendaelemieke evaluationofthreeswabbingdevicesfordetectionoflisteriamonocytogenesondifferenttypesoffoodcontactsurfaces |