Cargando…

Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis (erysipelas) is a recurring and debilitating bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis using low dose penicillin V in patients following a first episode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mason, James M., Thomas, Kim S., Crook, Angela M., Foster, Katharine A., Chalmers, Joanne R., Nunn, Andrew J., Williams, Hywel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082694
_version_ 1782303804675325952
author Mason, James M.
Thomas, Kim S.
Crook, Angela M.
Foster, Katharine A.
Chalmers, Joanne R.
Nunn, Andrew J.
Williams, Hywel C.
author_facet Mason, James M.
Thomas, Kim S.
Crook, Angela M.
Foster, Katharine A.
Chalmers, Joanne R.
Nunn, Andrew J.
Williams, Hywel C.
author_sort Mason, James M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cellulitis (erysipelas) is a recurring and debilitating bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis using low dose penicillin V in patients following a first episode (6 months prophylaxis) and more recurrent cellulitis (12 months prophylaxis, or 6 months in those declining 12 months). METHODS: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the findings of two randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trials (PATCH I and PATCH II), in which patients recruited in the UK and Ireland were followed-up for up to 3 years. Incremental cost, reduction in recurrence, cost per recurrence prevented and cost/QALY were estimated. National unit and reference costs for England in 2010 were applied to resource use, exploring NHS and societal perspectives. A total of 397 patients from the two trials contributed to the analysis. RESULTS: There was a 29% reduction in the number of recurrences occurring within the trial (IRR: 0.71 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.90, p = 0.02), corresponding to an absolute reduction of recurrence of 0.31 recurrences/patient (95%CI: 0.05 to 0.59, p = 0.02). Incremental costs of prophylaxis suggested a small cost saving but were not statistically significant, comparing the two groups. If a decision-maker is willing to pay up to £25,000/QALY then there is a 66% probability of antibiotic prophylaxis being cost-effective from an NHS perspective, rising to 76% probability from a secondary, societal perspective. CONCLUSION: Following first episode or recurrent cellulitis of the leg, prophylactic low dose penicillin is a very low cost intervention which, on balance, is effective and cost-effective at preventing subsequent attacks. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces cellulitis recurrence by nearly a third but is not associated with a significant increase in costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3925077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39250772014-02-18 Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials Mason, James M. Thomas, Kim S. Crook, Angela M. Foster, Katharine A. Chalmers, Joanne R. Nunn, Andrew J. Williams, Hywel C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cellulitis (erysipelas) is a recurring and debilitating bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis using low dose penicillin V in patients following a first episode (6 months prophylaxis) and more recurrent cellulitis (12 months prophylaxis, or 6 months in those declining 12 months). METHODS: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the findings of two randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trials (PATCH I and PATCH II), in which patients recruited in the UK and Ireland were followed-up for up to 3 years. Incremental cost, reduction in recurrence, cost per recurrence prevented and cost/QALY were estimated. National unit and reference costs for England in 2010 were applied to resource use, exploring NHS and societal perspectives. A total of 397 patients from the two trials contributed to the analysis. RESULTS: There was a 29% reduction in the number of recurrences occurring within the trial (IRR: 0.71 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.90, p = 0.02), corresponding to an absolute reduction of recurrence of 0.31 recurrences/patient (95%CI: 0.05 to 0.59, p = 0.02). Incremental costs of prophylaxis suggested a small cost saving but were not statistically significant, comparing the two groups. If a decision-maker is willing to pay up to £25,000/QALY then there is a 66% probability of antibiotic prophylaxis being cost-effective from an NHS perspective, rising to 76% probability from a secondary, societal perspective. CONCLUSION: Following first episode or recurrent cellulitis of the leg, prophylactic low dose penicillin is a very low cost intervention which, on balance, is effective and cost-effective at preventing subsequent attacks. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces cellulitis recurrence by nearly a third but is not associated with a significant increase in costs. Public Library of Science 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3925077/ /pubmed/24551029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082694 Text en © 2014 Mason et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mason, James M.
Thomas, Kim S.
Crook, Angela M.
Foster, Katharine A.
Chalmers, Joanne R.
Nunn, Andrew J.
Williams, Hywel C.
Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title_full Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title_fullStr Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title_short Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent Cellulitis of the Leg: Economic Analysis of the PATCH I & II Trials
title_sort prophylactic antibiotics to prevent cellulitis of the leg: economic analysis of the patch i & ii trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082694
work_keys_str_mv AT masonjamesm prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT thomaskims prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT crookangelam prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT fosterkatharinea prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT chalmersjoanner prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT nunnandrewj prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials
AT williamshywelc prophylacticantibioticstopreventcellulitisofthelegeconomicanalysisofthepatchiiitrials