Cargando…

What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise

Expert knowledge is a valuable source of information with a wide range of research applications. Despite the recent advances in defining expert knowledge, little attention has been given to how to view expertise as a system of interacting contributory factors for quantifying an individual's exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caley, Michael Julian, O'Leary, Rebecca A, Fisher, Rebecca, Low-Choy, Samantha, Johnson, Sandra, Mengersen, Kerrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.926
_version_ 1782303857381998592
author Caley, Michael Julian
O'Leary, Rebecca A
Fisher, Rebecca
Low-Choy, Samantha
Johnson, Sandra
Mengersen, Kerrie
author_facet Caley, Michael Julian
O'Leary, Rebecca A
Fisher, Rebecca
Low-Choy, Samantha
Johnson, Sandra
Mengersen, Kerrie
author_sort Caley, Michael Julian
collection PubMed
description Expert knowledge is a valuable source of information with a wide range of research applications. Despite the recent advances in defining expert knowledge, little attention has been given to how to view expertise as a system of interacting contributory factors for quantifying an individual's expertise. We present a systems approach to expertise that accounts for many contributing factors and their inter-relationships and allows quantification of an individual's expertise. A Bayesian network (BN) was chosen for this purpose. For illustration, we focused on taxonomic expertise. The model structure was developed in consultation with taxonomists. The relative importance of the factors within the network was determined by a second set of taxonomists (supra-experts) who also provided validation of the model structure. Model performance was assessed by applying the model to hypothetical career states of taxonomists designed to incorporate known differences in career states for model testing. The resulting BN model consisted of 18 primary nodes feeding through one to three higher-order nodes before converging on the target node (Taxonomic Expert). There was strong consistency among node weights provided by the supra-experts for some nodes, but not others. The higher-order nodes, “Quality of work” and “Total productivity”, had the greatest weights. Sensitivity analysis indicated that although some factors had stronger influence in the outer nodes of the network, there was relatively equal influence of the factors leading directly into the target node. Despite the differences in the node weights provided by our supra-experts, there was good agreement among assessments of our hypothetical experts that accurately reflected differences we had specified. This systems approach provides a way of assessing the overall level of expertise of individuals, accounting for multiple contributory factors, and their interactions. Our approach is adaptable to other situations where it is desirable to understand components of expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3925425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39254252014-02-20 What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise Caley, Michael Julian O'Leary, Rebecca A Fisher, Rebecca Low-Choy, Samantha Johnson, Sandra Mengersen, Kerrie Ecol Evol Original Research Expert knowledge is a valuable source of information with a wide range of research applications. Despite the recent advances in defining expert knowledge, little attention has been given to how to view expertise as a system of interacting contributory factors for quantifying an individual's expertise. We present a systems approach to expertise that accounts for many contributing factors and their inter-relationships and allows quantification of an individual's expertise. A Bayesian network (BN) was chosen for this purpose. For illustration, we focused on taxonomic expertise. The model structure was developed in consultation with taxonomists. The relative importance of the factors within the network was determined by a second set of taxonomists (supra-experts) who also provided validation of the model structure. Model performance was assessed by applying the model to hypothetical career states of taxonomists designed to incorporate known differences in career states for model testing. The resulting BN model consisted of 18 primary nodes feeding through one to three higher-order nodes before converging on the target node (Taxonomic Expert). There was strong consistency among node weights provided by the supra-experts for some nodes, but not others. The higher-order nodes, “Quality of work” and “Total productivity”, had the greatest weights. Sensitivity analysis indicated that although some factors had stronger influence in the outer nodes of the network, there was relatively equal influence of the factors leading directly into the target node. Despite the differences in the node weights provided by our supra-experts, there was good agreement among assessments of our hypothetical experts that accurately reflected differences we had specified. This systems approach provides a way of assessing the overall level of expertise of individuals, accounting for multiple contributory factors, and their interactions. Our approach is adaptable to other situations where it is desirable to understand components of expertise. John Wiley & Sons 2014-02 2013-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3925425/ /pubmed/24558579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.926 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Caley, Michael Julian
O'Leary, Rebecca A
Fisher, Rebecca
Low-Choy, Samantha
Johnson, Sandra
Mengersen, Kerrie
What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title_full What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title_fullStr What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title_full_unstemmed What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title_short What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise
title_sort what is an expert? a systems perspective on expertise
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.926
work_keys_str_mv AT caleymichaeljulian whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise
AT olearyrebeccaa whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise
AT fisherrebecca whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise
AT lowchoysamantha whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise
AT johnsonsandra whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise
AT mengersenkerrie whatisanexpertasystemsperspectiveonexpertise