Cargando…

ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa

BACKGROUND: Divergence in gene regulation has emerged as a key mechanism underlying species differentiation. Comparative analysis of co-expression networks across species can reveal conservation and divergence in the regulation of genes. RESULTS: We inferred co-expression networks of A. thaliana, Po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Netotea, Sergiu, Sundell, David, Street, Nathaniel R, Hvidsten, Torgeir R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-106
_version_ 1782303929639370752
author Netotea, Sergiu
Sundell, David
Street, Nathaniel R
Hvidsten, Torgeir R
author_facet Netotea, Sergiu
Sundell, David
Street, Nathaniel R
Hvidsten, Torgeir R
author_sort Netotea, Sergiu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Divergence in gene regulation has emerged as a key mechanism underlying species differentiation. Comparative analysis of co-expression networks across species can reveal conservation and divergence in the regulation of genes. RESULTS: We inferred co-expression networks of A. thaliana, Populus spp. and O. sativa using state-of-the-art methods based on mutual information and context likelihood of relatedness, and conducted a comprehensive comparison of these networks across a range of co-expression thresholds. In addition to quantifying gene-gene link and network neighbourhood conservation, we also applied recent advancements in network analysis to do cross-species comparisons of network properties such as scale free characteristics and gene centrality as well as network motifs. We found that in all species the networks emerged as scale free only above a certain co-expression threshold, and that the high-centrality genes upholding this organization tended to be conserved. Network motifs, in particular the feed-forward loop, were found to be significantly enriched in specific functional subnetworks but where much less conserved across species than gene centrality. Although individual gene-gene co-expression had massively diverged, up to ~80% of the genes still had a significantly conserved network neighbourhood. For genes with multiple predicted orthologs, about half had one ortholog with conserved regulation and another ortholog with diverged or non-conserved regulation. Furthermore, the most sequence similar ortholog was not the one with the most conserved gene regulation in over half of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided a comprehensive analysis of gene regulation evolution in plants and built a web tool for Comparative analysis of Plant co-Expression networks (ComPlEx, http://complex.plantgenie.org/). The tool can be particularly useful for identifying the ortholog with the most conserved regulation among several sequence-similar alternatives and can thus be of practical importance in e.g. finding candidate genes for perturbation experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3925997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39259972014-02-18 ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa Netotea, Sergiu Sundell, David Street, Nathaniel R Hvidsten, Torgeir R BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Divergence in gene regulation has emerged as a key mechanism underlying species differentiation. Comparative analysis of co-expression networks across species can reveal conservation and divergence in the regulation of genes. RESULTS: We inferred co-expression networks of A. thaliana, Populus spp. and O. sativa using state-of-the-art methods based on mutual information and context likelihood of relatedness, and conducted a comprehensive comparison of these networks across a range of co-expression thresholds. In addition to quantifying gene-gene link and network neighbourhood conservation, we also applied recent advancements in network analysis to do cross-species comparisons of network properties such as scale free characteristics and gene centrality as well as network motifs. We found that in all species the networks emerged as scale free only above a certain co-expression threshold, and that the high-centrality genes upholding this organization tended to be conserved. Network motifs, in particular the feed-forward loop, were found to be significantly enriched in specific functional subnetworks but where much less conserved across species than gene centrality. Although individual gene-gene co-expression had massively diverged, up to ~80% of the genes still had a significantly conserved network neighbourhood. For genes with multiple predicted orthologs, about half had one ortholog with conserved regulation and another ortholog with diverged or non-conserved regulation. Furthermore, the most sequence similar ortholog was not the one with the most conserved gene regulation in over half of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided a comprehensive analysis of gene regulation evolution in plants and built a web tool for Comparative analysis of Plant co-Expression networks (ComPlEx, http://complex.plantgenie.org/). The tool can be particularly useful for identifying the ortholog with the most conserved regulation among several sequence-similar alternatives and can thus be of practical importance in e.g. finding candidate genes for perturbation experiments. BioMed Central 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3925997/ /pubmed/24498971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-106 Text en Copyright © 2014 Netotea et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Netotea, Sergiu
Sundell, David
Street, Nathaniel R
Hvidsten, Torgeir R
ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title_full ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title_fullStr ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title_full_unstemmed ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title_short ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa
title_sort complex: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in a. thaliana, populus and o. sativa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-106
work_keys_str_mv AT netoteasergiu complexconservationanddivergenceofcoexpressionnetworksinathalianapopulusandosativa
AT sundelldavid complexconservationanddivergenceofcoexpressionnetworksinathalianapopulusandosativa
AT streetnathanielr complexconservationanddivergenceofcoexpressionnetworksinathalianapopulusandosativa
AT hvidstentorgeirr complexconservationanddivergenceofcoexpressionnetworksinathalianapopulusandosativa