Cargando…

Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives

Clinical trials have demonstrated that catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure and improves blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. The follow-up data indicate that the blood pressure lowering effect of the procedure may last for up to 36 months. Despite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa, Prejbisz, Aleksander, Florczak, Elżbieta, Kądziela, Jacek, Witkowski, Adam, Januszewicz, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570754
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2013.38866
_version_ 1782304069751144448
author Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa
Prejbisz, Aleksander
Florczak, Elżbieta
Kądziela, Jacek
Witkowski, Adam
Januszewicz, Andrzej
author_facet Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa
Prejbisz, Aleksander
Florczak, Elżbieta
Kądziela, Jacek
Witkowski, Adam
Januszewicz, Andrzej
author_sort Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa
collection PubMed
description Clinical trials have demonstrated that catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure and improves blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. The follow-up data indicate that the blood pressure lowering effect of the procedure may last for up to 36 months. Despite the fact that RDN is a growing and promising technique, still more data from clinical trials are needed to support the long-term safety and persistent efficacy of this approach as compared to the best possible pharmacological treatment. It would also be particularly important to recognize the clinical features of patients who would benefit most from RDN as well as the clinical characteristics of non-responders to the procedure. As renal denervation also reduces whole-body sympathetic nerve activity, the clinical entities characterized by sympathetic nervous system activation – including hypertension coexisting with metabolic abnormalities and/or sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias – may be potential new indications for the procedure. However, only a few small clinical studies so far have shown the potential benefit of renal denervation in these clinical situations and large clinical trials are needed to prove this concept. Catheter-based RDN is a promising (but also novel) therapeutic approach and further studies should also verify whether it can be considered as a procedure in management of patients not only with resistant hypertension, but also as a tool in the treatment of mild to moderate forms of hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3927110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39271102014-02-25 Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa Prejbisz, Aleksander Florczak, Elżbieta Kądziela, Jacek Witkowski, Adam Januszewicz, Andrzej Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Expert Reviews Clinical trials have demonstrated that catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure and improves blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. The follow-up data indicate that the blood pressure lowering effect of the procedure may last for up to 36 months. Despite the fact that RDN is a growing and promising technique, still more data from clinical trials are needed to support the long-term safety and persistent efficacy of this approach as compared to the best possible pharmacological treatment. It would also be particularly important to recognize the clinical features of patients who would benefit most from RDN as well as the clinical characteristics of non-responders to the procedure. As renal denervation also reduces whole-body sympathetic nerve activity, the clinical entities characterized by sympathetic nervous system activation – including hypertension coexisting with metabolic abnormalities and/or sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias – may be potential new indications for the procedure. However, only a few small clinical studies so far have shown the potential benefit of renal denervation in these clinical situations and large clinical trials are needed to prove this concept. Catheter-based RDN is a promising (but also novel) therapeutic approach and further studies should also verify whether it can be considered as a procedure in management of patients not only with resistant hypertension, but also as a tool in the treatment of mild to moderate forms of hypertension. Termedia Publishing House 2013-11-18 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3927110/ /pubmed/24570754 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2013.38866 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Expert Reviews
Warchoł-Celińska, Ewa
Prejbisz, Aleksander
Florczak, Elżbieta
Kądziela, Jacek
Witkowski, Adam
Januszewicz, Andrzej
Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title_full Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title_fullStr Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title_short Renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
title_sort renal denervation – current evidence and perspectives
topic Expert Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570754
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2013.38866
work_keys_str_mv AT warchołcelinskaewa renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives
AT prejbiszaleksander renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives
AT florczakelzbieta renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives
AT kadzielajacek renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives
AT witkowskiadam renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives
AT januszewiczandrzej renaldenervationcurrentevidenceandperspectives