Cargando…

Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study

Previous studies demonstrated significant differences in the learning and performance of discrete movement sequences across the lifespan: Young adults (18–28 years) showed more indications for the development of (implicit) motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge than middle-aged (55–62 years; V...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruitenberg, Marit F. L., Abrahamse, Elger L., De Kleine, Elian, Verwey, Willem B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00119
_version_ 1782304071829422080
author Ruitenberg, Marit F. L.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
De Kleine, Elian
Verwey, Willem B.
author_facet Ruitenberg, Marit F. L.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
De Kleine, Elian
Verwey, Willem B.
author_sort Ruitenberg, Marit F. L.
collection PubMed
description Previous studies demonstrated significant differences in the learning and performance of discrete movement sequences across the lifespan: Young adults (18–28 years) showed more indications for the development of (implicit) motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge than middle-aged (55–62 years; Verwey et al., 2011) and elderly participants (75–88 years; Verwey, 2010). Still, even in the absence of indications for motor chunks, the middle-aged and elderly participants showed some performance improvement too. This was attributed to a sequence learning mechanism in which individual reactions are primed by implicit sequential knowledge. The present work further examined sequential movement skill across these age groups. We explored the consequences of making an error on the execution of a subsequent sequence, and investigated whether this is modulated by aging. To that end, we re-analyzed the data from our previous studies. Results demonstrate that sequencing performance is slowed after an error has been made in the previous sequence. Importantly, for young adults and middle-aged participants the observed slowing was also accompanied by increased accuracy after an error. We suggest that slowing in these age groups involves both functional and non-functional components, while slowing in elderly participants is non-functional. Moreover, using action sequences (instead of single key-presses) may allow to better track the effects on performance of making an error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3927119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39271192014-03-05 Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study Ruitenberg, Marit F. L. Abrahamse, Elger L. De Kleine, Elian Verwey, Willem B. Front Psychol Psychology Previous studies demonstrated significant differences in the learning and performance of discrete movement sequences across the lifespan: Young adults (18–28 years) showed more indications for the development of (implicit) motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge than middle-aged (55–62 years; Verwey et al., 2011) and elderly participants (75–88 years; Verwey, 2010). Still, even in the absence of indications for motor chunks, the middle-aged and elderly participants showed some performance improvement too. This was attributed to a sequence learning mechanism in which individual reactions are primed by implicit sequential knowledge. The present work further examined sequential movement skill across these age groups. We explored the consequences of making an error on the execution of a subsequent sequence, and investigated whether this is modulated by aging. To that end, we re-analyzed the data from our previous studies. Results demonstrate that sequencing performance is slowed after an error has been made in the previous sequence. Importantly, for young adults and middle-aged participants the observed slowing was also accompanied by increased accuracy after an error. We suggest that slowing in these age groups involves both functional and non-functional components, while slowing in elderly participants is non-functional. Moreover, using action sequences (instead of single key-presses) may allow to better track the effects on performance of making an error. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3927119/ /pubmed/24600419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00119 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ruitenberg, Abrahamse, De Kleine and Verwey. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ruitenberg, Marit F. L.
Abrahamse, Elger L.
De Kleine, Elian
Verwey, Willem B.
Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title_full Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title_fullStr Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title_full_unstemmed Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title_short Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
title_sort post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00119
work_keys_str_mv AT ruitenbergmaritfl posterrorslowinginsequentialactionanagingstudy
AT abrahamseelgerl posterrorslowinginsequentialactionanagingstudy
AT dekleineelian posterrorslowinginsequentialactionanagingstudy
AT verweywillemb posterrorslowinginsequentialactionanagingstudy