Cargando…

Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions

We have previously shown that passively observing a task-irrelevant rhythmical action can bias the cycle time of a subsequently executed rhythmical action. Here we use the same paradigm to investigate the impact of different forms of motor imagery (MI) during action observation (AO) on this automati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eaves, Daniel L., Haythornthwaite, Lauren, Vogt, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00028
_version_ 1782304073474637824
author Eaves, Daniel L.
Haythornthwaite, Lauren
Vogt, Stefan
author_facet Eaves, Daniel L.
Haythornthwaite, Lauren
Vogt, Stefan
author_sort Eaves, Daniel L.
collection PubMed
description We have previously shown that passively observing a task-irrelevant rhythmical action can bias the cycle time of a subsequently executed rhythmical action. Here we use the same paradigm to investigate the impact of different forms of motor imagery (MI) during action observation (AO) on this automatic imitation (AI) effect. Participants saw a picture of the instructed action followed by a rhythmical distractor movie, wherein cycle time was subtly manipulated across trials. They then executed the instructed rhythmical action. When participants imagined performing the instructed action in synchrony with the distractor action (AO + MI), a strong imitation bias was found that was significantly greater than in our previous study. The bias was pronounced equally for compatible and incompatible trials, wherein observed and imagined actions were different in type (e.g., face washing vs. painting) or plane of movement, or both. In contrast, no imitation bias was observed when MI conflicted with AO. In Experiment 2, motor execution synchronized with AO produced a stronger imitation bias compared to AO + MI, showing an advantage in synchronization for overt execution over MI. Furthermore, the bias was stronger when participants synchronized the instructed action with the distractor movie, compared to when they synchronized the distractor action with the distractor movie. Although we still observed a significant bias in the latter condition, this finding indicates a degree of specificity in AI effects for the identity of the synchronized action. Overall, our data show that MI can substantially modulate the effects of AO on subsequent execution, wherein: (1) combined AO + MI can enhance AI effects relative to passive AO; (2) observed and imagined actions can be flexibly coordinated across different action types and planes; and (3) conflicting AO + MI can abolish AI effects. Therefore, combined AO + MI instructions should be considered in motor training and rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3927126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39271262014-03-05 Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions Eaves, Daniel L. Haythornthwaite, Lauren Vogt, Stefan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience We have previously shown that passively observing a task-irrelevant rhythmical action can bias the cycle time of a subsequently executed rhythmical action. Here we use the same paradigm to investigate the impact of different forms of motor imagery (MI) during action observation (AO) on this automatic imitation (AI) effect. Participants saw a picture of the instructed action followed by a rhythmical distractor movie, wherein cycle time was subtly manipulated across trials. They then executed the instructed rhythmical action. When participants imagined performing the instructed action in synchrony with the distractor action (AO + MI), a strong imitation bias was found that was significantly greater than in our previous study. The bias was pronounced equally for compatible and incompatible trials, wherein observed and imagined actions were different in type (e.g., face washing vs. painting) or plane of movement, or both. In contrast, no imitation bias was observed when MI conflicted with AO. In Experiment 2, motor execution synchronized with AO produced a stronger imitation bias compared to AO + MI, showing an advantage in synchronization for overt execution over MI. Furthermore, the bias was stronger when participants synchronized the instructed action with the distractor movie, compared to when they synchronized the distractor action with the distractor movie. Although we still observed a significant bias in the latter condition, this finding indicates a degree of specificity in AI effects for the identity of the synchronized action. Overall, our data show that MI can substantially modulate the effects of AO on subsequent execution, wherein: (1) combined AO + MI can enhance AI effects relative to passive AO; (2) observed and imagined actions can be flexibly coordinated across different action types and planes; and (3) conflicting AO + MI can abolish AI effects. Therefore, combined AO + MI instructions should be considered in motor training and rehabilitation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3927126/ /pubmed/24600369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00028 Text en Copyright © 2014 Eaves, Haythornthwaite and Vogt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Eaves, Daniel L.
Haythornthwaite, Lauren
Vogt, Stefan
Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title_full Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title_fullStr Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title_full_unstemmed Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title_short Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
title_sort motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00028
work_keys_str_mv AT eavesdaniell motorimageryduringactionobservationmodulatesautomaticimitationeffectsinrhythmicalactions
AT haythornthwaitelauren motorimageryduringactionobservationmodulatesautomaticimitationeffectsinrhythmicalactions
AT vogtstefan motorimageryduringactionobservationmodulatesautomaticimitationeffectsinrhythmicalactions