Cargando…
The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function
Introduction. Systemic effects of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) may be altered by the mode of surgery. This study aimed to determine systemic effects of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open repair (OR). Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients with rAAA were repaired by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24616809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/178323 |
_version_ | 1782304190871109632 |
---|---|
author | Makar, R. R. Badger, S. A. O'Donnell, M. E. Soong, C. V. Lau, L. L. Young, I. S. Hannon, R. J. Lee, B. |
author_facet | Makar, R. R. Badger, S. A. O'Donnell, M. E. Soong, C. V. Lau, L. L. Young, I. S. Hannon, R. J. Lee, B. |
author_sort | Makar, R. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Systemic effects of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) may be altered by the mode of surgery. This study aimed to determine systemic effects of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open repair (OR). Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients with rAAA were repaired by OR or EVAR according to computerised tomographic (CT) findings. Renal function was monitored by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum urea and creatinine, and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR). Hepatic function was assessed postoperatively for 5 days. Intestinal function was determined by the paracetamol absorption test. Intestinal permeability was assessed by urinary lactulose/mannitol ratio. Results. 30 rAAA patients were included. Fourteen had eEVAR and sixteen eOR. Serum urea were higher in eOR, while creatinine was similar between groups. Hepatic function showed no intergroup difference. Paracetamol absorption was increased in eEVAR group at day 3 compared to day 1 (P = 0.03), with no similar result in eOR (P = 0.24). Peak lactulose/mannitol ratio was higher in eOR (P = 0.03), with higher urinary L/M ratio in eOR at day 3 (P = 0.02). Clinical intestinal function returned quicker in eEVAR (P = 0.02). Conclusion. EVAR attenuated the organ dysfunction compared to open repair. However, a larger comparative trial would be required to validate this. The clinical trial is registered with reference number EUDRACT: 2013-003373-12. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3927867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39278672014-03-10 The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function Makar, R. R. Badger, S. A. O'Donnell, M. E. Soong, C. V. Lau, L. L. Young, I. S. Hannon, R. J. Lee, B. Int J Vasc Med Research Article Introduction. Systemic effects of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) may be altered by the mode of surgery. This study aimed to determine systemic effects of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open repair (OR). Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients with rAAA were repaired by OR or EVAR according to computerised tomographic (CT) findings. Renal function was monitored by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum urea and creatinine, and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR). Hepatic function was assessed postoperatively for 5 days. Intestinal function was determined by the paracetamol absorption test. Intestinal permeability was assessed by urinary lactulose/mannitol ratio. Results. 30 rAAA patients were included. Fourteen had eEVAR and sixteen eOR. Serum urea were higher in eOR, while creatinine was similar between groups. Hepatic function showed no intergroup difference. Paracetamol absorption was increased in eEVAR group at day 3 compared to day 1 (P = 0.03), with no similar result in eOR (P = 0.24). Peak lactulose/mannitol ratio was higher in eOR (P = 0.03), with higher urinary L/M ratio in eOR at day 3 (P = 0.02). Clinical intestinal function returned quicker in eEVAR (P = 0.02). Conclusion. EVAR attenuated the organ dysfunction compared to open repair. However, a larger comparative trial would be required to validate this. The clinical trial is registered with reference number EUDRACT: 2013-003373-12. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3927867/ /pubmed/24616809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/178323 Text en Copyright © 2014 R. R. Makar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Makar, R. R. Badger, S. A. O'Donnell, M. E. Soong, C. V. Lau, L. L. Young, I. S. Hannon, R. J. Lee, B. The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title | The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title_full | The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title_short | The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on the Gastrointestinal and Renal Function |
title_sort | impact of endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on the gastrointestinal and renal function |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24616809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/178323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makarrr theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT badgersa theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT odonnellme theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT soongcv theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT laull theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT youngis theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT hannonrj theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT leeb theimpactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT makarrr impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT badgersa impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT odonnellme impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT soongcv impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT laull impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT youngis impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT hannonrj impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction AT leeb impactofendovascularrepairofrupturedabdominalaorticaneurysmonthegastrointestinalandrenalfunction |