Cargando…

Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of social media to promote healthy diet and exercise in the general population. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Alt Health Watch, Health Source, Communi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Gillian, Hamm, Michele P, Shulhan, Jocelyn, Vandermeer, Ben, Hartling, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24525388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003926
_version_ 1782304197481332736
author Williams, Gillian
Hamm, Michele P
Shulhan, Jocelyn
Vandermeer, Ben
Hartling, Lisa
author_facet Williams, Gillian
Hamm, Michele P
Shulhan, Jocelyn
Vandermeer, Ben
Hartling, Lisa
author_sort Williams, Gillian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of social media to promote healthy diet and exercise in the general population. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Alt Health Watch, Health Source, Communication and Mass Media Complete, Web of Knowledge and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis (2000–2013). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs of social media interventions promoting healthy diet and exercise behaviours in the general population were eligible. Interventions using social media, alone or as part of a complex intervention, were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We describe the studies according to the target populations, objectives and nature of interventions, outcomes examined, and results and conclusions. We extracted data on the primary and secondary outcomes examined in each study. Where the same outcome was assessed in at least three studies, we combined data in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: 22 studies were included. Participants were typically middle-aged Caucasian women of mid-to-high socioeconomic status. There were a variety of interventions, comparison groups and outcomes. All studies showed a decrease in programme usage throughout the intervention period. Overall, no significant differences were found for primary outcomes which varied across studies. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in changes in physical activity (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.13 (95% CI −0.04 to 0.30), 12 studies) and weight (SMD −0.00 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.19), 10 studies); however, pooled results from five studies showed a significant decrease in dietary fat consumption with social media (SMD −0.35 (95% CI −0.68 to −0.02)). CONCLUSIONS: Social media may provide certain advantages for public health interventions; however, studies of social media interventions to date relating to healthy lifestyles tend to show low levels of participation and do not show significant differences between groups in key outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3927930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39279302014-02-19 Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Williams, Gillian Hamm, Michele P Shulhan, Jocelyn Vandermeer, Ben Hartling, Lisa BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of social media to promote healthy diet and exercise in the general population. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Alt Health Watch, Health Source, Communication and Mass Media Complete, Web of Knowledge and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis (2000–2013). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs of social media interventions promoting healthy diet and exercise behaviours in the general population were eligible. Interventions using social media, alone or as part of a complex intervention, were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We describe the studies according to the target populations, objectives and nature of interventions, outcomes examined, and results and conclusions. We extracted data on the primary and secondary outcomes examined in each study. Where the same outcome was assessed in at least three studies, we combined data in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: 22 studies were included. Participants were typically middle-aged Caucasian women of mid-to-high socioeconomic status. There were a variety of interventions, comparison groups and outcomes. All studies showed a decrease in programme usage throughout the intervention period. Overall, no significant differences were found for primary outcomes which varied across studies. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in changes in physical activity (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.13 (95% CI −0.04 to 0.30), 12 studies) and weight (SMD −0.00 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.19), 10 studies); however, pooled results from five studies showed a significant decrease in dietary fat consumption with social media (SMD −0.35 (95% CI −0.68 to −0.02)). CONCLUSIONS: Social media may provide certain advantages for public health interventions; however, studies of social media interventions to date relating to healthy lifestyles tend to show low levels of participation and do not show significant differences between groups in key outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3927930/ /pubmed/24525388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003926 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Communication
Williams, Gillian
Hamm, Michele P
Shulhan, Jocelyn
Vandermeer, Ben
Hartling, Lisa
Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24525388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003926
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsgillian socialmediainterventionsfordietandexercisebehavioursasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT hammmichelep socialmediainterventionsfordietandexercisebehavioursasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT shulhanjocelyn socialmediainterventionsfordietandexercisebehavioursasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT vandermeerben socialmediainterventionsfordietandexercisebehavioursasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT hartlinglisa socialmediainterventionsfordietandexercisebehavioursasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials