Cargando…

Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples

BACKGROUND: Viral load (VL) monitoring is the standard of care in developing country settings for detecting HIV treatment failure. Since 2010 the World Health Organization has recommended a phase-in approach to VL monitoring in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review of the accur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sollis, Kimberly A., Smit, Pieter W., Fiscus, Susan, Ford, Nathan, Vitoria, Marco, Essajee, Shaffiq, Barnett, David, Cheng, Ben, Crowe, Suzanne M., Denny, Thomas, Landay, Alan, Stevens, Wendy, Habiyambere, Vincent, Perrins, Jos, Peeling, Rosanna W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085869
_version_ 1782304208308928512
author Sollis, Kimberly A.
Smit, Pieter W.
Fiscus, Susan
Ford, Nathan
Vitoria, Marco
Essajee, Shaffiq
Barnett, David
Cheng, Ben
Crowe, Suzanne M.
Denny, Thomas
Landay, Alan
Stevens, Wendy
Habiyambere, Vincent
Perrins, Jos
Peeling, Rosanna W.
author_facet Sollis, Kimberly A.
Smit, Pieter W.
Fiscus, Susan
Ford, Nathan
Vitoria, Marco
Essajee, Shaffiq
Barnett, David
Cheng, Ben
Crowe, Suzanne M.
Denny, Thomas
Landay, Alan
Stevens, Wendy
Habiyambere, Vincent
Perrins, Jos
Peeling, Rosanna W.
author_sort Sollis, Kimberly A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viral load (VL) monitoring is the standard of care in developing country settings for detecting HIV treatment failure. Since 2010 the World Health Organization has recommended a phase-in approach to VL monitoring in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review of the accuracy and precision of HIV VL technologies for treatment monitoring. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search of Medline and Embase was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy or reproducibility of commercially available HIV VL assays. 37 studies were included for review including evaluations of the Amplicor Monitor HIV-1 v1.5 (n = 25), Cobas TaqMan v2.0 (n = 11), Abbott RealTime HIV-1 (n = 23), Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA 3.0 (n = 15), Versant HIV-1 RNA kPCR 1.0 (n = 2), ExaVir Load v3 (n = 2), and NucliSens EasyQ v2.0 (n = 1). All currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma virus levels at a lower detection limit of 1,000 copies/mL. Bias data comparing the Abbott RealTime HIV-1, TaqMan v2.0 to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5 showed a tendency of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 to under-estimate results while the TaqMan v2.0 overestimated VL counts. Compared to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5, 2–26% and 9–70% of results from the Versant bDNA 3.0 and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 differed by greater than 0.5log(10). The average intra and inter-assay variation of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 were 2.95% (range 2.0–5.1%) and 5.44% (range 1.17–30.00%) across the range of VL counts (2log(10)–7log(10)). CONCLUSIONS: This review found that all currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma VL of 1,000 copies/mL as a threshold to initiate investigations of treatment adherence or possible treatment failure. Sources of variability between VL assays include differences in technology platform, plasma input volume, and ability to detect HIV-1 subtypes. Monitoring of individual patients should be performed on the same technology platform to ensure appropriate interpretation of changes in VL. Prospero registration # CD42013003603.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39280472014-02-20 Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples Sollis, Kimberly A. Smit, Pieter W. Fiscus, Susan Ford, Nathan Vitoria, Marco Essajee, Shaffiq Barnett, David Cheng, Ben Crowe, Suzanne M. Denny, Thomas Landay, Alan Stevens, Wendy Habiyambere, Vincent Perrins, Jos Peeling, Rosanna W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Viral load (VL) monitoring is the standard of care in developing country settings for detecting HIV treatment failure. Since 2010 the World Health Organization has recommended a phase-in approach to VL monitoring in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review of the accuracy and precision of HIV VL technologies for treatment monitoring. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search of Medline and Embase was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy or reproducibility of commercially available HIV VL assays. 37 studies were included for review including evaluations of the Amplicor Monitor HIV-1 v1.5 (n = 25), Cobas TaqMan v2.0 (n = 11), Abbott RealTime HIV-1 (n = 23), Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA 3.0 (n = 15), Versant HIV-1 RNA kPCR 1.0 (n = 2), ExaVir Load v3 (n = 2), and NucliSens EasyQ v2.0 (n = 1). All currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma virus levels at a lower detection limit of 1,000 copies/mL. Bias data comparing the Abbott RealTime HIV-1, TaqMan v2.0 to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5 showed a tendency of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 to under-estimate results while the TaqMan v2.0 overestimated VL counts. Compared to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5, 2–26% and 9–70% of results from the Versant bDNA 3.0 and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 differed by greater than 0.5log(10). The average intra and inter-assay variation of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 were 2.95% (range 2.0–5.1%) and 5.44% (range 1.17–30.00%) across the range of VL counts (2log(10)–7log(10)). CONCLUSIONS: This review found that all currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma VL of 1,000 copies/mL as a threshold to initiate investigations of treatment adherence or possible treatment failure. Sources of variability between VL assays include differences in technology platform, plasma input volume, and ability to detect HIV-1 subtypes. Monitoring of individual patients should be performed on the same technology platform to ensure appropriate interpretation of changes in VL. Prospero registration # CD42013003603. Public Library of Science 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3928047/ /pubmed/24558359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085869 Text en © 2014 Sollis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sollis, Kimberly A.
Smit, Pieter W.
Fiscus, Susan
Ford, Nathan
Vitoria, Marco
Essajee, Shaffiq
Barnett, David
Cheng, Ben
Crowe, Suzanne M.
Denny, Thomas
Landay, Alan
Stevens, Wendy
Habiyambere, Vincent
Perrins, Jos
Peeling, Rosanna W.
Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title_full Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title_fullStr Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title_short Systematic Review of the Performance of HIV Viral Load Technologies on Plasma Samples
title_sort systematic review of the performance of hiv viral load technologies on plasma samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085869
work_keys_str_mv AT solliskimberlya systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT smitpieterw systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT fiscussusan systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT fordnathan systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT vitoriamarco systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT essajeeshaffiq systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT barnettdavid systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT chengben systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT crowesuzannem systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT dennythomas systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT landayalan systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT stevenswendy systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT habiyamberevincent systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT perrinsjos systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples
AT peelingrosannaw systematicreviewoftheperformanceofhivviralloadtechnologiesonplasmasamples