Cargando…

Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) due to birch pollen is a growing health concern in Europe. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution administered discontinuously for 2 consecutive years to patients with birch-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Worm, Margitta, Rak, Sabina, de Blay, Frédéric, Malling, Hans-Jorgen, Melac, Michel, Cadic, Véronique, Zeldin, Robert K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24517417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-7
_version_ 1782304212575584256
author Worm, Margitta
Rak, Sabina
de Blay, Frédéric
Malling, Hans-Jorgen
Melac, Michel
Cadic, Véronique
Zeldin, Robert K
author_facet Worm, Margitta
Rak, Sabina
de Blay, Frédéric
Malling, Hans-Jorgen
Melac, Michel
Cadic, Véronique
Zeldin, Robert K
author_sort Worm, Margitta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) due to birch pollen is a growing health concern in Europe. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution administered discontinuously for 2 consecutive years to patients with birch-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Birch pollen-allergic adults were randomized in this double blind study to 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution or placebo, daily, starting 4 months before and continuing through the pollen season for two pollen seasons. Randomization was stratified according to the presence or absence of oral allergy syndrome (OAS). The primary efficacy endpoint was the Average Adjusted Symptom Score (AAdSS) over the second pollen season and was analyzed by ANCOVA. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the AAdSS over the first pollen period. Safety was evaluated by means of adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: 574 patients (284 in the active group and 290 in the placebo group) were randomized and 496 completed the study. Over the second pollen period, the least square (LS) mean AAdSS was significantly lower in the 300IR group than in the placebo group (LS mean difference −2.04, 95% CI [−2.69, −1.40], (p <0.0001) with a relative reduction of 30.6%. Results were consistent in patients with and without OAS (−33.6% and −28.4%, respectively). A significant reduction in LS mean AAdSS was also observed over the first pollen season. The most frequently reported adverse events were application site reactions: oral pruritus, throat irritation, and mouth edema. There were no reports of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and co-seasonal treatment with 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy over 2 pollen seasons and was well tolerated in adults with birch pollen-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Efficacy results were consistent in patients with and without oral allergy syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01731249.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39280832014-02-19 Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study Worm, Margitta Rak, Sabina de Blay, Frédéric Malling, Hans-Jorgen Melac, Michel Cadic, Véronique Zeldin, Robert K Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) due to birch pollen is a growing health concern in Europe. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution administered discontinuously for 2 consecutive years to patients with birch-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Birch pollen-allergic adults were randomized in this double blind study to 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution or placebo, daily, starting 4 months before and continuing through the pollen season for two pollen seasons. Randomization was stratified according to the presence or absence of oral allergy syndrome (OAS). The primary efficacy endpoint was the Average Adjusted Symptom Score (AAdSS) over the second pollen season and was analyzed by ANCOVA. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the AAdSS over the first pollen period. Safety was evaluated by means of adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: 574 patients (284 in the active group and 290 in the placebo group) were randomized and 496 completed the study. Over the second pollen period, the least square (LS) mean AAdSS was significantly lower in the 300IR group than in the placebo group (LS mean difference −2.04, 95% CI [−2.69, −1.40], (p <0.0001) with a relative reduction of 30.6%. Results were consistent in patients with and without OAS (−33.6% and −28.4%, respectively). A significant reduction in LS mean AAdSS was also observed over the first pollen season. The most frequently reported adverse events were application site reactions: oral pruritus, throat irritation, and mouth edema. There were no reports of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and co-seasonal treatment with 300IR birch pollen sublingual solution demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy over 2 pollen seasons and was well tolerated in adults with birch pollen-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Efficacy results were consistent in patients with and without oral allergy syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01731249. BioMed Central 2014-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3928083/ /pubmed/24517417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2014 Worm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Worm, Margitta
Rak, Sabina
de Blay, Frédéric
Malling, Hans-Jorgen
Melac, Michel
Cadic, Véronique
Zeldin, Robert K
Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_full Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_fullStr Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_short Sustained efficacy and safety of a 300IR daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
title_sort sustained efficacy and safety of a 300ir daily dose of a sublingual solution of birch pollen allergen extract in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24517417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wormmargitta sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT raksabina sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT deblayfrederic sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT mallinghansjorgen sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT melacmichel sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT cadicveronique sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT zeldinrobertk sustainedefficacyandsafetyofa300irdailydoseofasublingualsolutionofbirchpollenallergenextractinadultswithallergicrhinoconjunctivitisresultsofadoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy