Cargando…
Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). BACKGROUND: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088753 |
_version_ | 1782304235092705280 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Weizhi Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Chen Zhi, Xiaofei Wang, Baolin Xu, Zekuan |
author_facet | Wang, Weizhi Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Chen Zhi, Xiaofei Wang, Baolin Xu, Zekuan |
author_sort | Wang, Weizhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). BACKGROUND: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. METHODS: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. RESULTS: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. CONCLUSION: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3928285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39282852014-02-20 Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Wang, Weizhi Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Chen Zhi, Xiaofei Wang, Baolin Xu, Zekuan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). BACKGROUND: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. METHODS: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. RESULTS: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. CONCLUSION: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required. Public Library of Science 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3928285/ /pubmed/24558421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088753 Text en © 2014 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Weizhi Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Chen Zhi, Xiaofei Wang, Baolin Xu, Zekuan Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title | Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangweizhi laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis AT zhangxiaoyu laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis AT shenchen laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis AT zhixiaofei laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis AT wangbaolin laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis AT xuzekuan laparoscopicversusopentotalgastrectomyforgastriccanceranupdatedmetaanalysis |