Cargando…

Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment

A number of studies have concluded that cognitive control is not fully established until late adolescence. The precise differences in brain function between adults and adolescents with respect to cognitive control, however, remain unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a study in which 185 ado...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodehacke, Sarah, Mennigen, Eva, Müller, Kathrin U., Ripke, Stephan, Jacob, Mark J., Hübner, Thomas, Schmidt, Dirk H. K., Goschke, Thomas, Smolka, Michael N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088957
_version_ 1782304245401255936
author Rodehacke, Sarah
Mennigen, Eva
Müller, Kathrin U.
Ripke, Stephan
Jacob, Mark J.
Hübner, Thomas
Schmidt, Dirk H. K.
Goschke, Thomas
Smolka, Michael N.
author_facet Rodehacke, Sarah
Mennigen, Eva
Müller, Kathrin U.
Ripke, Stephan
Jacob, Mark J.
Hübner, Thomas
Schmidt, Dirk H. K.
Goschke, Thomas
Smolka, Michael N.
author_sort Rodehacke, Sarah
collection PubMed
description A number of studies have concluded that cognitive control is not fully established until late adolescence. The precise differences in brain function between adults and adolescents with respect to cognitive control, however, remain unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a study in which 185 adolescents (mean age (SD) 14.6 (0.3) years) and 28 adults (mean age (SD) 25.2 (6.3) years) performed a single task that included both a stimulus-response (S-R) interference component and a task-switching component. Behavioural responses (i.e. reaction time, RT; error rate, ER) and brain activity during correct, error and post-error trials, detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), were measured. Behaviourally, RT and ER were significantly higher in incongruent than in congruent trials and in switch than in repeat trials. The two groups did not differ in RT during correct trials, but adolescents had a significantly higher ER than adults. In line with similar RTs, brain responses during correct trials did not differ between groups, indicating that adolescents and adults engage the same cognitive control network to successfully overcome S-R interference or task switches. Interestingly, adolescents with stronger brain activation in the bilateral insulae during error trials and in fronto-parietal regions of the cognitive control network during post-error trials did have lower ERs. This indicates that those mid-adolescents who commit fewer errors are better at monitoring their performance, and after detecting errors are more capable of flexibly allocating further cognitive control resources. Although we did not detect a convincing neural correlate of the observed behavioural differences between adolescents and adults, the revealed interindividual differences in adolescents might at least in part be due to brain development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39283332014-02-20 Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment Rodehacke, Sarah Mennigen, Eva Müller, Kathrin U. Ripke, Stephan Jacob, Mark J. Hübner, Thomas Schmidt, Dirk H. K. Goschke, Thomas Smolka, Michael N. PLoS One Research Article A number of studies have concluded that cognitive control is not fully established until late adolescence. The precise differences in brain function between adults and adolescents with respect to cognitive control, however, remain unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a study in which 185 adolescents (mean age (SD) 14.6 (0.3) years) and 28 adults (mean age (SD) 25.2 (6.3) years) performed a single task that included both a stimulus-response (S-R) interference component and a task-switching component. Behavioural responses (i.e. reaction time, RT; error rate, ER) and brain activity during correct, error and post-error trials, detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), were measured. Behaviourally, RT and ER were significantly higher in incongruent than in congruent trials and in switch than in repeat trials. The two groups did not differ in RT during correct trials, but adolescents had a significantly higher ER than adults. In line with similar RTs, brain responses during correct trials did not differ between groups, indicating that adolescents and adults engage the same cognitive control network to successfully overcome S-R interference or task switches. Interestingly, adolescents with stronger brain activation in the bilateral insulae during error trials and in fronto-parietal regions of the cognitive control network during post-error trials did have lower ERs. This indicates that those mid-adolescents who commit fewer errors are better at monitoring their performance, and after detecting errors are more capable of flexibly allocating further cognitive control resources. Although we did not detect a convincing neural correlate of the observed behavioural differences between adolescents and adults, the revealed interindividual differences in adolescents might at least in part be due to brain development. Public Library of Science 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3928333/ /pubmed/24558455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088957 Text en © 2014 Rodehacke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodehacke, Sarah
Mennigen, Eva
Müller, Kathrin U.
Ripke, Stephan
Jacob, Mark J.
Hübner, Thomas
Schmidt, Dirk H. K.
Goschke, Thomas
Smolka, Michael N.
Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title_full Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title_fullStr Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title_full_unstemmed Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title_short Interindividual Differences in Mid-Adolescents in Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustment
title_sort interindividual differences in mid-adolescents in error monitoring and post-error adjustment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088957
work_keys_str_mv AT rodehackesarah interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT mennigeneva interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT mullerkathrinu interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT ripkestephan interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT jacobmarkj interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT hubnerthomas interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT schmidtdirkhk interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT goschkethomas interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment
AT smolkamichaeln interindividualdifferencesinmidadolescentsinerrormonitoringandposterroradjustment