Cargando…

Accelerated Development of Cervical Spine Instabilities in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Minimum 5-Year Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the incidence and predictive risk factors of cervical spine instabilities which may induce compression myelopathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Three types of cervical spine instability were radiographically categorized into “moderate” and “severe” based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yurube, Takashi, Sumi, Masatoshi, Nishida, Kotaro, Miyamoto, Hiroshi, Kohyama, Kozo, Matsubara, Tsukasa, Miura, Yasushi, Hirata, Hiroaki, Sugiyama, Daisuke, Doita, Minoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088970
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To clarify the incidence and predictive risk factors of cervical spine instabilities which may induce compression myelopathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Three types of cervical spine instability were radiographically categorized into “moderate” and “severe” based on atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS: atlantodental interval >3 mm versus ≥10 mm), vertical subluxation (VS: Ranawat value <13 mm versus ≤10 mm), and subaxial subluxation (SAS: irreducible translation ≥2 mm versus ≥4 mm or at multiple). 228 “definite” or “classical” RA patients (140 without instability and 88 with “moderate” instability) were prospectively followed for >5 years. The endpoint incidence of “severe” instabilities and predictors for “severe” instability were determined. RESULTS: Patients with baseline “moderate” instability, including all sub-groups (AAS(+) [VS(−) SAS(−)], VS(+) [SAS(−) AAS(±)], and SAS(+) [AAS(±) VS(±)]), developed “severe” instabilities more frequently (33.3% with AAS(+), 75.0% with VS(+), and 42.9% with SAS(+)) than those initially without instability (12.9%; p<0.003, p<0.003, and p = 0.061, respectively). The incidence of cervical canal stenosis and/or basilar invagination was also higher in patients with initial instability (17.5% with AAS(+), 37.5% with VS(+), and 14.3% with SAS(+)) than in those without instability (7.1%; p = 0.028, p<0.003, and p = 0.427, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified corticosteroid administration, Steinbrocker stage III or IV at baseline, mutilating changes at baseline, and the development of mutilans during the follow-up period correlated with the progression to “severe” instability (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective cohort study demonstrates accelerated development of cervical spine involvement in RA patients with pre-existing instability—especially VS. Advanced peripheral erosiveness and concomitant corticosteroid treatment are indicators for poor prognosis of the cervical spine in RA.