Cargando…

Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE: The ability of visually impaired people to deploy attention effectively to maximize use of their residual vision in dynamic situations is fundamental to safe mobility. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate whether tests of dynamic attention (multiple object tracking; MOT) and static attent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberti, Concetta F., Horowitz, Todd, Bronstad, P. Matthew, Bowers, Alex R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089381
_version_ 1782304260091805696
author Alberti, Concetta F.
Horowitz, Todd
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Bowers, Alex R.
author_facet Alberti, Concetta F.
Horowitz, Todd
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Bowers, Alex R.
author_sort Alberti, Concetta F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The ability of visually impaired people to deploy attention effectively to maximize use of their residual vision in dynamic situations is fundamental to safe mobility. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate whether tests of dynamic attention (multiple object tracking; MOT) and static attention (Useful Field of View; UFOV) were predictive of the ability of people with central field loss (CFL) to detect pedestrian hazards in simulated driving. METHODS: 11 people with bilateral CFL (visual acuity 20/30-20/200) and 11 age-similar normally-sighted drivers participated. Dynamic and static attention were evaluated with brief, computer-based MOT and UFOV tasks, respectively. Dependent variables were the log speed threshold for 60% correct identification of targets (MOT) and the increase in the presentation duration for 75% correct identification of a central target when a concurrent peripheral task was added (UFOV divided and selective attention subtests). Participants drove in a simulator and pressed the horn whenever they detected pedestrians that walked or ran toward the road. The dependent variable was the proportion of timely reactions (could have stopped in time to avoid a collision). RESULTS: UFOV and MOT performance of CFL participants was poorer than that of controls, and the proportion of timely reactions was also lower (worse) (84% and 97%, respectively; p = 0.001). For CFL participants, higher proportions of timely reactions correlated significantly with higher (better) MOT speed thresholds (r = 0.73, p = 0.01), with better performance on the UFOV divided and selective attention subtests (r = −0.66 and −0.62, respectively, p<0.04), with better contrast sensitivity scores (r = 0.54, p = 0.08) and smaller scotomas (r = −0.60, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that brief laboratory-based tests of visual attention may provide useful measures of functional visual ability of individuals with CFL relevant to more complex mobility tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39284372014-02-20 Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study Alberti, Concetta F. Horowitz, Todd Bronstad, P. Matthew Bowers, Alex R. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The ability of visually impaired people to deploy attention effectively to maximize use of their residual vision in dynamic situations is fundamental to safe mobility. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate whether tests of dynamic attention (multiple object tracking; MOT) and static attention (Useful Field of View; UFOV) were predictive of the ability of people with central field loss (CFL) to detect pedestrian hazards in simulated driving. METHODS: 11 people with bilateral CFL (visual acuity 20/30-20/200) and 11 age-similar normally-sighted drivers participated. Dynamic and static attention were evaluated with brief, computer-based MOT and UFOV tasks, respectively. Dependent variables were the log speed threshold for 60% correct identification of targets (MOT) and the increase in the presentation duration for 75% correct identification of a central target when a concurrent peripheral task was added (UFOV divided and selective attention subtests). Participants drove in a simulator and pressed the horn whenever they detected pedestrians that walked or ran toward the road. The dependent variable was the proportion of timely reactions (could have stopped in time to avoid a collision). RESULTS: UFOV and MOT performance of CFL participants was poorer than that of controls, and the proportion of timely reactions was also lower (worse) (84% and 97%, respectively; p = 0.001). For CFL participants, higher proportions of timely reactions correlated significantly with higher (better) MOT speed thresholds (r = 0.73, p = 0.01), with better performance on the UFOV divided and selective attention subtests (r = −0.66 and −0.62, respectively, p<0.04), with better contrast sensitivity scores (r = 0.54, p = 0.08) and smaller scotomas (r = −0.60, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that brief laboratory-based tests of visual attention may provide useful measures of functional visual ability of individuals with CFL relevant to more complex mobility tasks. Public Library of Science 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3928437/ /pubmed/24558495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089381 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alberti, Concetta F.
Horowitz, Todd
Bronstad, P. Matthew
Bowers, Alex R.
Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title_full Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title_short Visual Attention Measures Predict Pedestrian Detection in Central Field Loss: A Pilot Study
title_sort visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089381
work_keys_str_mv AT alberticoncettaf visualattentionmeasurespredictpedestriandetectionincentralfieldlossapilotstudy
AT horowitztodd visualattentionmeasurespredictpedestriandetectionincentralfieldlossapilotstudy
AT bronstadpmatthew visualattentionmeasurespredictpedestriandetectionincentralfieldlossapilotstudy
AT bowersalexr visualattentionmeasurespredictpedestriandetectionincentralfieldlossapilotstudy