Cargando…

The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Due to fragmented mental, somatic, and social healthcare services, it can be hard to engage into care older patients with severe mental illness (SMI). In adult mental health care, assertive community treatment (ACT) is an organizational model of care for treating patients with SMI who ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stobbe, Jolanda, Wierdsma, André I, Kok, Rob M, Kroon, Hans, Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan, Depla, Marja, Mulder, Cornelis L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24528604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-42
_version_ 1782304336438624256
author Stobbe, Jolanda
Wierdsma, André I
Kok, Rob M
Kroon, Hans
Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan
Depla, Marja
Mulder, Cornelis L
author_facet Stobbe, Jolanda
Wierdsma, André I
Kok, Rob M
Kroon, Hans
Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan
Depla, Marja
Mulder, Cornelis L
author_sort Stobbe, Jolanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to fragmented mental, somatic, and social healthcare services, it can be hard to engage into care older patients with severe mental illness (SMI). In adult mental health care, assertive community treatment (ACT) is an organizational model of care for treating patients with SMI who are difficult to engage. So far all outcome studies of assertive community treatment have been conducted in adults. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial design we compared the effectiveness of ACT for elderly patients with that of treatment as usual (TAU). Sixty-two outpatients (60 years and older) with SMI who were difficult to engage in psychiatric treatment were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (32 to ACT for elderly patients and 30 to TAU). Primary outcomes included number of patients who had a first treatment contact within 3 months, the number of dropouts (i.e. those discharged from care due to refusing care or those who unintentionally lost contact with the service over a period of at least 3 months); and patients’ psychosocial functioning (HoNOS65+ scores) during 18 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of unmet needs and mental health care use. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients who were randomized, 26 were lost to follow-up (10 patients in ACT for elderly patients and 16 in TAU). Relative to patients with TAU, more patients allocated to ACT had a first contact within three months (96.9 versus 66.7%; X(2) (df = 1) = 9.68, p = 0.002). ACT for elderly patients also had fewer dropouts from treatment (18.8% of assertive community treatment for elderly patients versus 50% of TAU patients; X(2) (df = 1) = 6.75, p = 0.009). There were no differences in the other primary and secondary outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ACT for elderly patients with SMI engaged patients in treatment more successfully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR1620
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39289762014-02-20 The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial Stobbe, Jolanda Wierdsma, André I Kok, Rob M Kroon, Hans Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan Depla, Marja Mulder, Cornelis L BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to fragmented mental, somatic, and social healthcare services, it can be hard to engage into care older patients with severe mental illness (SMI). In adult mental health care, assertive community treatment (ACT) is an organizational model of care for treating patients with SMI who are difficult to engage. So far all outcome studies of assertive community treatment have been conducted in adults. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial design we compared the effectiveness of ACT for elderly patients with that of treatment as usual (TAU). Sixty-two outpatients (60 years and older) with SMI who were difficult to engage in psychiatric treatment were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (32 to ACT for elderly patients and 30 to TAU). Primary outcomes included number of patients who had a first treatment contact within 3 months, the number of dropouts (i.e. those discharged from care due to refusing care or those who unintentionally lost contact with the service over a period of at least 3 months); and patients’ psychosocial functioning (HoNOS65+ scores) during 18 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of unmet needs and mental health care use. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients who were randomized, 26 were lost to follow-up (10 patients in ACT for elderly patients and 16 in TAU). Relative to patients with TAU, more patients allocated to ACT had a first contact within three months (96.9 versus 66.7%; X(2) (df = 1) = 9.68, p = 0.002). ACT for elderly patients also had fewer dropouts from treatment (18.8% of assertive community treatment for elderly patients versus 50% of TAU patients; X(2) (df = 1) = 6.75, p = 0.009). There were no differences in the other primary and secondary outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ACT for elderly patients with SMI engaged patients in treatment more successfully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR1620 BioMed Central 2014-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3928976/ /pubmed/24528604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-42 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stobbe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stobbe, Jolanda
Wierdsma, André I
Kok, Rob M
Kroon, Hans
Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan
Depla, Marja
Mulder, Cornelis L
The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24528604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-42
work_keys_str_mv AT stobbejolanda theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wierdsmaandrei theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kokrobm theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kroonhans theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT roosenschoonbertjan theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deplamarja theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muldercornelisl theeffectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stobbejolanda effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wierdsmaandrei effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kokrobm effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kroonhans effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT roosenschoonbertjan effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deplamarja effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muldercornelisl effectivenessofassertivecommunitytreatmentforelderlypatientswithseverementalillnessarandomizedcontrolledtrial