Cargando…

Fate of Clinical Research Studies after Ethical Approval – Follow-Up of Study Protocols until Publication

BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies are ultimately not fully published in peer-reviewed journals. Underreporting of clinical research is wasteful and can result in biased estimates of treatment effect or harm, leading to recommendations that are inappropriate or even dangerous. METHODS: We assembled a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Blümle, Anette, Meerpohl, Joerg J., Schumacher, Martin, von Elm, Erik
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3929354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087184

Ejemplares similares

Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee – A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A multi-state model analysis of the time from ethical approval to publication of clinical research studies
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research
por: Schmucker, Christine M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics Committee
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
por: Portalupi, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
por: Briel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
por: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study
por: Toews, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction: Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials
por: Kasenda, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Ethics Approval
por: Ross, W M
Publicado: (1994)

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
por: Kasenda, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
por: Müller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Local Research Ethics Committees’ Approval in a National Population Study
por: Busby, Araceli, et al.
Publicado: (1998)

Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees
por: Bain, Luchuo Engelbert
Publicado: (2017)

A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Ventricular cell fate can be specified until the onset of myocardial differentiation
por: Caporilli, Simona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review
por: von Elm, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced prostate cancer A systematic review with meta-analysis
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ethics approval for health professions education research: Necessary and beneficial
por: Schutte, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects
por: Gryaznov, Dmitry, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012
por: Marušić, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Failure to Apply for Ethical Approval for Health Studies in Low-Income Countries
por: van Teijlingen, Edwin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Monitoring of approved studies: A difficult tightrope walk by Ethics Committees
por: Davis, Sanish
Publicado: (2018)

Current Experience of Central versus Local Ethics Approval in Multicentre Studies
por: Watling, M I L, et al.
Publicado: (1993)

Publication ethics from the ground up
por: DeTora, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Bespoke linkage of Public Health England laboratory data on gastrointestinal infections to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink: Ethics approval and a study proposal
por: Esan, Oluwaseun, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)
por: Gryaznov, Dmitry, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Approval from the ethics committee in published studies from the Indian Journal of Psychiatry
por: Praharaj, Samir Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Ethics Review Committee approval and informed consent: an analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka
por: Sumathipala, Athula, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Particle Collider start-up on hold until spring
Publicado: (2008)

The challenges of obtaining ethics approval for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled research study in Jersey
por: Haresnape, Claire
Publicado: (2013)

Ethical and research governance approval across Europe: Experiences from three European palliative care studies
por: Preston, Nancy, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_bb9c65eu4s0u8dvgsu96le7mvj