Cargando…

The ontogeny of learned inhibition

Previous studies have examined the maturation of learning and memory abilities during early stages of development. By comparison, much less is known about the ontogeny of learning and memory during later stages of development, including adolescence. In Experiment 1, we tested the ability of adolesce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Heidi C., Bucci, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3929852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24549569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.033787.113
_version_ 1782304458342924288
author Meyer, Heidi C.
Bucci, David J.
author_facet Meyer, Heidi C.
Bucci, David J.
author_sort Meyer, Heidi C.
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have examined the maturation of learning and memory abilities during early stages of development. By comparison, much less is known about the ontogeny of learning and memory during later stages of development, including adolescence. In Experiment 1, we tested the ability of adolescent and adult rats to learn a Pavlovian negative occasion setting task. This procedure involves learning to inhibit a behavioral response when signaled by a cue in the environment. During reinforced trials, a target stimulus (a tone) was presented and immediately followed by a food reward. On nonreinforced trials, a feature stimulus (a light) was presented 5 sec prior to the tone and indicated the absence of reward following presentation of the tone. Both adult and adolescent rats learned to discriminate between two different trial types and withhold responding when the light preceded the tone. However, adolescent rats required more sessions than adults to discriminate between reinforced and nonreinforced trials. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that adolescents could learn the task rules but were specifically impaired in expressing that learning in the form of withholding behavior on nonreinforced trials. In Experiment 3, we found that adolescents were also impaired in learning a different version of the task in which the light and tone were presented simultaneously during the nonreinforced trials. These findings add to existing literature by indicating that impairments in inhibitory behavior during adolescence do not reflect an inability to learn to inhibit a response, but instead reflect a specific deficit in expressing that learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3929852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39298522015-03-01 The ontogeny of learned inhibition Meyer, Heidi C. Bucci, David J. Learn Mem Research Previous studies have examined the maturation of learning and memory abilities during early stages of development. By comparison, much less is known about the ontogeny of learning and memory during later stages of development, including adolescence. In Experiment 1, we tested the ability of adolescent and adult rats to learn a Pavlovian negative occasion setting task. This procedure involves learning to inhibit a behavioral response when signaled by a cue in the environment. During reinforced trials, a target stimulus (a tone) was presented and immediately followed by a food reward. On nonreinforced trials, a feature stimulus (a light) was presented 5 sec prior to the tone and indicated the absence of reward following presentation of the tone. Both adult and adolescent rats learned to discriminate between two different trial types and withhold responding when the light preceded the tone. However, adolescent rats required more sessions than adults to discriminate between reinforced and nonreinforced trials. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that adolescents could learn the task rules but were specifically impaired in expressing that learning in the form of withholding behavior on nonreinforced trials. In Experiment 3, we found that adolescents were also impaired in learning a different version of the task in which the light and tone were presented simultaneously during the nonreinforced trials. These findings add to existing literature by indicating that impairments in inhibitory behavior during adolescence do not reflect an inability to learn to inhibit a response, but instead reflect a specific deficit in expressing that learning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3929852/ /pubmed/24549569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.033787.113 Text en © 2014 Meyer and Bucci; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Meyer, Heidi C.
Bucci, David J.
The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title_full The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title_fullStr The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title_full_unstemmed The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title_short The ontogeny of learned inhibition
title_sort ontogeny of learned inhibition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3929852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24549569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.033787.113
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerheidic theontogenyoflearnedinhibition
AT buccidavidj theontogenyoflearnedinhibition
AT meyerheidic ontogenyoflearnedinhibition
AT buccidavidj ontogenyoflearnedinhibition