Cargando…

Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl

Food availability is an important limiting factor for avian reproduction. In altricial birds, food limitation is assumed to be more severe during the nestling stage than during laying or incubation, but this has yet to be adequately tested. Using food-supplementation experiments over a 5-year period...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellicome, Troy I, Danielle Todd, L, Poulin, Ray G, Holroyd, Geoffrey L, Fisher, Ryan J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Science Inc 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.616
_version_ 1782304489837953024
author Wellicome, Troy I
Danielle Todd, L
Poulin, Ray G
Holroyd, Geoffrey L
Fisher, Ryan J
author_facet Wellicome, Troy I
Danielle Todd, L
Poulin, Ray G
Holroyd, Geoffrey L
Fisher, Ryan J
author_sort Wellicome, Troy I
collection PubMed
description Food availability is an important limiting factor for avian reproduction. In altricial birds, food limitation is assumed to be more severe during the nestling stage than during laying or incubation, but this has yet to be adequately tested. Using food-supplementation experiments over a 5-year period, we determined the degree and timing of food limitation for burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) breeding in Canada. Burrowing owls are an endangered species and food limitation during the nestling stage could influence reproductive performance of this species at the northern extent of their range. Supplemented pairs fledged on average 47% more owlets than unfed pairs, except during a year when natural food was not limiting (i.e., a prey irruption year). The difference in fledgling production resulted from high nestling mortality in unfed broods, with 96% of all nestling deaths being attributed to food shortage. Supplemental feeding during the nestling period also increased fledgling structural size. Pairs fed from the start of laying produced the same number of hatchlings as pairs that received no supplemental food before hatch. Furthermore, pairs supplemented from egg laying to fledging and pairs supplemented during the nestling period alone had the same patterns of nestling survival, equal numbers of fledglings, and similar fledgling mass and structural size. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the nestling period is the most food-limited phase of the breeding cycle. The experimental design we introduce here could be used with other altricial species to examine how the timing of food limitation differs among birds with a variety of life-history strategies. For burrowing owls, and other species with similar life histories, long-term, large-scale, and appropriately timed habitat management increasing prey abundance or availability is critical for conservation. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the nestling period is the most food-limited phase of the breeding cycle. For burrowing owls, and other species with similar life histories, long-term, large-scale, and appropriately timed habitat management increasing prey abundance or availability is critical for conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Science Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39300412014-02-24 Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl Wellicome, Troy I Danielle Todd, L Poulin, Ray G Holroyd, Geoffrey L Fisher, Ryan J Ecol Evol Original Research Food availability is an important limiting factor for avian reproduction. In altricial birds, food limitation is assumed to be more severe during the nestling stage than during laying or incubation, but this has yet to be adequately tested. Using food-supplementation experiments over a 5-year period, we determined the degree and timing of food limitation for burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) breeding in Canada. Burrowing owls are an endangered species and food limitation during the nestling stage could influence reproductive performance of this species at the northern extent of their range. Supplemented pairs fledged on average 47% more owlets than unfed pairs, except during a year when natural food was not limiting (i.e., a prey irruption year). The difference in fledgling production resulted from high nestling mortality in unfed broods, with 96% of all nestling deaths being attributed to food shortage. Supplemental feeding during the nestling period also increased fledgling structural size. Pairs fed from the start of laying produced the same number of hatchlings as pairs that received no supplemental food before hatch. Furthermore, pairs supplemented from egg laying to fledging and pairs supplemented during the nestling period alone had the same patterns of nestling survival, equal numbers of fledglings, and similar fledgling mass and structural size. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the nestling period is the most food-limited phase of the breeding cycle. The experimental design we introduce here could be used with other altricial species to examine how the timing of food limitation differs among birds with a variety of life-history strategies. For burrowing owls, and other species with similar life histories, long-term, large-scale, and appropriately timed habitat management increasing prey abundance or availability is critical for conservation. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the nestling period is the most food-limited phase of the breeding cycle. For burrowing owls, and other species with similar life histories, long-term, large-scale, and appropriately timed habitat management increasing prey abundance or availability is critical for conservation. Blackwell Science Inc 2013-08 2013-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3930041/ /pubmed/24567832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.616 Text en © 2013 Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wellicome, Troy I
Danielle Todd, L
Poulin, Ray G
Holroyd, Geoffrey L
Fisher, Ryan J
Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title_full Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title_fullStr Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title_full_unstemmed Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title_short Comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
title_sort comparing food limitation among three stages of nesting: supplementation experiments with the burrowing owl
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.616
work_keys_str_mv AT wellicometroyi comparingfoodlimitationamongthreestagesofnestingsupplementationexperimentswiththeburrowingowl
AT danielletoddl comparingfoodlimitationamongthreestagesofnestingsupplementationexperimentswiththeburrowingowl
AT poulinrayg comparingfoodlimitationamongthreestagesofnestingsupplementationexperimentswiththeburrowingowl
AT holroydgeoffreyl comparingfoodlimitationamongthreestagesofnestingsupplementationexperimentswiththeburrowingowl
AT fisherryanj comparingfoodlimitationamongthreestagesofnestingsupplementationexperimentswiththeburrowingowl