Cargando…

Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1

BACKGROUND: Whereas severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is associated with severe disease, human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) commonly circulates in the human populations causing generally milder illness. Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV activates the unfolded protein respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siu, Kam-Leung, Chan, Ching-Ping, Kok, Kin-Hang, Woo, Patrick C-Y, Jin, Dong-Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-4-3
_version_ 1782304494357315584
author Siu, Kam-Leung
Chan, Ching-Ping
Kok, Kin-Hang
Woo, Patrick C-Y
Jin, Dong-Yan
author_facet Siu, Kam-Leung
Chan, Ching-Ping
Kok, Kin-Hang
Woo, Patrick C-Y
Jin, Dong-Yan
author_sort Siu, Kam-Leung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whereas severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is associated with severe disease, human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) commonly circulates in the human populations causing generally milder illness. Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV activates the unfolded protein response (UPR). It is not understood whether HCoV-HKU1 S protein has similar activity. In addition, the UPR-activating domain in SARS-CoV S protein remains to be identified. RESULTS: In this study we compared S proteins of SARS-CoV and HCoV-HKU1 for their ability to activate the UPR. Both S proteins were found in the endoplasmic reticulum. Transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 catalyzed the cleavage of SARS-CoV S protein, but not the counterpart in HCoV-HKU1. Both S proteins showed a similar pattern of UPR-activating activity. Through PERK kinase they activated the transcription of UPR effector genes such as Grp78, Grp94 and CHOP. N-linked glycosylation was not required for the activation of the UPR by S proteins. S1 subunit of SARS-CoV but not its counterpart in HCoV-HKU1 was capable of activating the UPR. A central region (amino acids 201–400) of SARS-CoV S1 was required for this activity. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV and HCoV-HKU1 S proteins use distinct UPR-activating domains to exert the same modulatory effects on UPR signaling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39300722014-02-21 Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1 Siu, Kam-Leung Chan, Ching-Ping Kok, Kin-Hang Woo, Patrick C-Y Jin, Dong-Yan Cell Biosci Research BACKGROUND: Whereas severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is associated with severe disease, human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) commonly circulates in the human populations causing generally milder illness. Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV activates the unfolded protein response (UPR). It is not understood whether HCoV-HKU1 S protein has similar activity. In addition, the UPR-activating domain in SARS-CoV S protein remains to be identified. RESULTS: In this study we compared S proteins of SARS-CoV and HCoV-HKU1 for their ability to activate the UPR. Both S proteins were found in the endoplasmic reticulum. Transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 catalyzed the cleavage of SARS-CoV S protein, but not the counterpart in HCoV-HKU1. Both S proteins showed a similar pattern of UPR-activating activity. Through PERK kinase they activated the transcription of UPR effector genes such as Grp78, Grp94 and CHOP. N-linked glycosylation was not required for the activation of the UPR by S proteins. S1 subunit of SARS-CoV but not its counterpart in HCoV-HKU1 was capable of activating the UPR. A central region (amino acids 201–400) of SARS-CoV S1 was required for this activity. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV and HCoV-HKU1 S proteins use distinct UPR-activating domains to exert the same modulatory effects on UPR signaling. BioMed Central 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3930072/ /pubmed/24410900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-4-3 Text en Copyright © 2014 Siu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Siu, Kam-Leung
Chan, Ching-Ping
Kok, Kin-Hang
Woo, Patrick C-Y
Jin, Dong-Yan
Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title_full Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title_short Comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus HKU1
title_sort comparative analysis of the activation of unfolded protein response by spike proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus hku1
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-4-3
work_keys_str_mv AT siukamleung comparativeanalysisoftheactivationofunfoldedproteinresponsebyspikeproteinsofsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusandhumancoronavirushku1
AT chanchingping comparativeanalysisoftheactivationofunfoldedproteinresponsebyspikeproteinsofsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusandhumancoronavirushku1
AT kokkinhang comparativeanalysisoftheactivationofunfoldedproteinresponsebyspikeproteinsofsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusandhumancoronavirushku1
AT woopatrickcy comparativeanalysisoftheactivationofunfoldedproteinresponsebyspikeproteinsofsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusandhumancoronavirushku1
AT jindongyan comparativeanalysisoftheactivationofunfoldedproteinresponsebyspikeproteinsofsevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusandhumancoronavirushku1