Cargando…

A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades

It has been claimed that saccades arising from the three saccade triggering modes–stimulus-driven, endogenous mandatory and ‘free choice’–are driven by distinct mechanisms. We tested this claim by instructing observers to saccade from a white or black fixation disc to a same polarity (white or black...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorea, Andrei, Rider, Delphine, Yang, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088990
_version_ 1782304553764388864
author Gorea, Andrei
Rider, Delphine
Yang, Qing
author_facet Gorea, Andrei
Rider, Delphine
Yang, Qing
author_sort Gorea, Andrei
collection PubMed
description It has been claimed that saccades arising from the three saccade triggering modes–stimulus-driven, endogenous mandatory and ‘free choice’–are driven by distinct mechanisms. We tested this claim by instructing observers to saccade from a white or black fixation disc to a same polarity (white or black) disc flashed for 100 or 200 ms presented either alone (Exo), or together with an opposite (Endo) or same (EndoFC) polarity disc (blocked and mixed sessions). Target(s) and distractor were presented at three inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) relative to the fixation offset (ISI: −200, 0, +200 ms) and were displayed at random locations within a 4°-to-6° eccentricity range. The statistical analysis showed a global saccade triggering mode effect on saccade reaction times (SRTs) with Endo and EndoFC SRTs longer by about 27 ms than Exo-triggered ones but no effect for the Endo-EndoFC comparison. SRTs depended on both ISI (the “gap-effect”), and target duration. Bimodal best fits of the SRT-distributions were found in 65% of cases with their count not different across the three triggering modes. Percentages of saccades in the ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ ranges of bimodal fits did not depend on the triggering modes either. Bimodality tests failed to assert a significant difference between these modes. An analysis of the timing of a putative inhibition by the distractor (Endo) or by the duplicated target (EndoFC) yielded no significant difference between Endo and EndoFC saccades but showed a significant shortening with ISI similar to the SRT shortening suggesting that the distractor-target mutual inhibition is itself inhibited by ‘fixation’ neurons. While other experimental paradigms may well sustain claims of distinct mechanisms subtending the three saccade triggering modes, as here defined reflexive and voluntary saccades appear to differ primarily in the effectiveness with which inhibitory processes slow down the initial fast rise of the saccade triggering signal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39306012014-02-25 A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades Gorea, Andrei Rider, Delphine Yang, Qing PLoS One Research Article It has been claimed that saccades arising from the three saccade triggering modes–stimulus-driven, endogenous mandatory and ‘free choice’–are driven by distinct mechanisms. We tested this claim by instructing observers to saccade from a white or black fixation disc to a same polarity (white or black) disc flashed for 100 or 200 ms presented either alone (Exo), or together with an opposite (Endo) or same (EndoFC) polarity disc (blocked and mixed sessions). Target(s) and distractor were presented at three inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) relative to the fixation offset (ISI: −200, 0, +200 ms) and were displayed at random locations within a 4°-to-6° eccentricity range. The statistical analysis showed a global saccade triggering mode effect on saccade reaction times (SRTs) with Endo and EndoFC SRTs longer by about 27 ms than Exo-triggered ones but no effect for the Endo-EndoFC comparison. SRTs depended on both ISI (the “gap-effect”), and target duration. Bimodal best fits of the SRT-distributions were found in 65% of cases with their count not different across the three triggering modes. Percentages of saccades in the ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ ranges of bimodal fits did not depend on the triggering modes either. Bimodality tests failed to assert a significant difference between these modes. An analysis of the timing of a putative inhibition by the distractor (Endo) or by the duplicated target (EndoFC) yielded no significant difference between Endo and EndoFC saccades but showed a significant shortening with ISI similar to the SRT shortening suggesting that the distractor-target mutual inhibition is itself inhibited by ‘fixation’ neurons. While other experimental paradigms may well sustain claims of distinct mechanisms subtending the three saccade triggering modes, as here defined reflexive and voluntary saccades appear to differ primarily in the effectiveness with which inhibitory processes slow down the initial fast rise of the saccade triggering signal. Public Library of Science 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3930601/ /pubmed/24586474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088990 Text en © 2014 Gorea et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorea, Andrei
Rider, Delphine
Yang, Qing
A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title_full A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title_fullStr A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title_full_unstemmed A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title_short A Unified Comparison of Stimulus-Driven, Endogenous Mandatory and ‘Free Choice’ Saccades
title_sort unified comparison of stimulus-driven, endogenous mandatory and ‘free choice’ saccades
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088990
work_keys_str_mv AT goreaandrei aunifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades
AT riderdelphine aunifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades
AT yangqing aunifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades
AT goreaandrei unifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades
AT riderdelphine unifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades
AT yangqing unifiedcomparisonofstimulusdrivenendogenousmandatoryandfreechoicesaccades