Cargando…

BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The impact of BRAF tumor mutations on the natural course of disease of melanoma patients is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mutational status and overall survival of 215 patients receiving treatment with dacarbazine or temozolomide. All patients who started first-lin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meckbach, Diana, Keim, Ulrike, Richter, Sabina, Leiter, Ulrike, Eigentler, Thomas K., Bauer, Jürgen, Pflugfelder, Annette, Büttner, Petra, Garbe, Claus, Weide, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089218
_version_ 1782304562129928192
author Meckbach, Diana
Keim, Ulrike
Richter, Sabina
Leiter, Ulrike
Eigentler, Thomas K.
Bauer, Jürgen
Pflugfelder, Annette
Büttner, Petra
Garbe, Claus
Weide, Benjamin
author_facet Meckbach, Diana
Keim, Ulrike
Richter, Sabina
Leiter, Ulrike
Eigentler, Thomas K.
Bauer, Jürgen
Pflugfelder, Annette
Büttner, Petra
Garbe, Claus
Weide, Benjamin
author_sort Meckbach, Diana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of BRAF tumor mutations on the natural course of disease of melanoma patients is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mutational status and overall survival of 215 patients receiving treatment with dacarbazine or temozolomide. All patients who started first-line treatment at our institution between 2000 and 2010 were included to prevent selection and bias due to thereafter arising therapeutic options. RESULTS: No patient received BRAF- or MEK-inhibitors during follow-up. Survival was associated with the pattern of visceral involvement, the presence of brain metastases and the serum lactate dehydrogenase level (all p<0.001). The BRAF-V600 mutational status was not associated with survival and no differences in overall survival were detected according to age, gender or to the cytotoxic agent used for therapy. In Cox regression analysis the presence of brain metastases (hazard ratio 2.3; p<0.001) and an elevated serum LDH (hazard ratio 2.5; p<0.001) were the only factors, which independently predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in prognosis were observed according to the BRAF mutational status in patients with distant metastasis treated with monochemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39306702014-02-25 BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy Meckbach, Diana Keim, Ulrike Richter, Sabina Leiter, Ulrike Eigentler, Thomas K. Bauer, Jürgen Pflugfelder, Annette Büttner, Petra Garbe, Claus Weide, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of BRAF tumor mutations on the natural course of disease of melanoma patients is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mutational status and overall survival of 215 patients receiving treatment with dacarbazine or temozolomide. All patients who started first-line treatment at our institution between 2000 and 2010 were included to prevent selection and bias due to thereafter arising therapeutic options. RESULTS: No patient received BRAF- or MEK-inhibitors during follow-up. Survival was associated with the pattern of visceral involvement, the presence of brain metastases and the serum lactate dehydrogenase level (all p<0.001). The BRAF-V600 mutational status was not associated with survival and no differences in overall survival were detected according to age, gender or to the cytotoxic agent used for therapy. In Cox regression analysis the presence of brain metastases (hazard ratio 2.3; p<0.001) and an elevated serum LDH (hazard ratio 2.5; p<0.001) were the only factors, which independently predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in prognosis were observed according to the BRAF mutational status in patients with distant metastasis treated with monochemotherapy. Public Library of Science 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3930670/ /pubmed/24586605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089218 Text en © 2014 Meckbach et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meckbach, Diana
Keim, Ulrike
Richter, Sabina
Leiter, Ulrike
Eigentler, Thomas K.
Bauer, Jürgen
Pflugfelder, Annette
Büttner, Petra
Garbe, Claus
Weide, Benjamin
BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title_full BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title_fullStr BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title_short BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
title_sort braf-v600 mutations have no prognostic impact in stage iv melanoma patients treated with monochemotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089218
work_keys_str_mv AT meckbachdiana brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT keimulrike brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT richtersabina brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT leiterulrike brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT eigentlerthomask brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT bauerjurgen brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT pflugfelderannette brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT buttnerpetra brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT garbeclaus brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy
AT weidebenjamin brafv600mutationshavenoprognosticimpactinstageivmelanomapatientstreatedwithmonochemotherapy