Cargando…

Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins

Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules (MHC I) present peptides to cytotoxic T-cells at the surface of almost all nucleated cells. The function of MHC I molecules is to select high affinity peptides from a large intracellular pool and they are assisted in this process by co-factor molecu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Alistair, van Hateren, Andy, Elliott, Tim, Werner, Jörn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089657
_version_ 1782304579909582848
author Bailey, Alistair
van Hateren, Andy
Elliott, Tim
Werner, Jörn M.
author_facet Bailey, Alistair
van Hateren, Andy
Elliott, Tim
Werner, Jörn M.
author_sort Bailey, Alistair
collection PubMed
description Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules (MHC I) present peptides to cytotoxic T-cells at the surface of almost all nucleated cells. The function of MHC I molecules is to select high affinity peptides from a large intracellular pool and they are assisted in this process by co-factor molecules, notably tapasin. In contrast to mammals, MHC homozygous chickens express a single MHC I gene locus, termed BF2, which is hypothesised to have co-evolved with the highly polymorphic tapasin within stable haplotypes. The BF2 molecules of the B15 and B19 haplotypes have recently been shown to differ in their interactions with tapasin and in their peptide selection properties. This study investigated whether these observations might be explained by differences in the protein plasticity that is encoded into the MHC I structure by primary sequence polymorphisms. Furthermore, we aimed to demonstrate the utility of a complimentary modelling approach to the understanding of complex experimental data. Combining mechanistic molecular dynamics simulations and the primary sequence based technique of statistical coupling analysis, we show how two of the eight polymorphisms between BF2*15∶01 and BF2*19∶01 facilitate differences in plasticity. We show that BF2*15∶01 is intrinsically more plastic than BF2*19∶01, exploring more conformations in the absence of peptide. We identify a protein sector of contiguous residues connecting the membrane bound α(3) domain and the heavy chain peptide binding site. This sector contains two of the eight polymorphic residues. One is residue 22 in the peptide binding domain and the other 220 is in the α(3) domain, a putative tapasin binding site. These observations are in correspondence with the experimentally observed functional differences of these molecules and suggest a mechanism for how modulation of MHC I plasticity by tapasin catalyses peptide selection allosterically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39307472014-02-25 Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins Bailey, Alistair van Hateren, Andy Elliott, Tim Werner, Jörn M. PLoS One Research Article Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules (MHC I) present peptides to cytotoxic T-cells at the surface of almost all nucleated cells. The function of MHC I molecules is to select high affinity peptides from a large intracellular pool and they are assisted in this process by co-factor molecules, notably tapasin. In contrast to mammals, MHC homozygous chickens express a single MHC I gene locus, termed BF2, which is hypothesised to have co-evolved with the highly polymorphic tapasin within stable haplotypes. The BF2 molecules of the B15 and B19 haplotypes have recently been shown to differ in their interactions with tapasin and in their peptide selection properties. This study investigated whether these observations might be explained by differences in the protein plasticity that is encoded into the MHC I structure by primary sequence polymorphisms. Furthermore, we aimed to demonstrate the utility of a complimentary modelling approach to the understanding of complex experimental data. Combining mechanistic molecular dynamics simulations and the primary sequence based technique of statistical coupling analysis, we show how two of the eight polymorphisms between BF2*15∶01 and BF2*19∶01 facilitate differences in plasticity. We show that BF2*15∶01 is intrinsically more plastic than BF2*19∶01, exploring more conformations in the absence of peptide. We identify a protein sector of contiguous residues connecting the membrane bound α(3) domain and the heavy chain peptide binding site. This sector contains two of the eight polymorphic residues. One is residue 22 in the peptide binding domain and the other 220 is in the α(3) domain, a putative tapasin binding site. These observations are in correspondence with the experimentally observed functional differences of these molecules and suggest a mechanism for how modulation of MHC I plasticity by tapasin catalyses peptide selection allosterically. Public Library of Science 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3930747/ /pubmed/24586943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089657 Text en © 2014 Bailey et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bailey, Alistair
van Hateren, Andy
Elliott, Tim
Werner, Jörn M.
Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title_full Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title_fullStr Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title_full_unstemmed Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title_short Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins
title_sort two polymorphisms facilitate differences in plasticity between two chicken major histocompatibility complex class i proteins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089657
work_keys_str_mv AT baileyalistair twopolymorphismsfacilitatedifferencesinplasticitybetweentwochickenmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiproteins
AT vanhaterenandy twopolymorphismsfacilitatedifferencesinplasticitybetweentwochickenmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiproteins
AT elliotttim twopolymorphismsfacilitatedifferencesinplasticitybetweentwochickenmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiproteins
AT wernerjornm twopolymorphismsfacilitatedifferencesinplasticitybetweentwochickenmajorhistocompatibilitycomplexclassiproteins