Cargando…
Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study
BACKGROUND: In this retrospective comparative study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of fentanyl, midazolam, and a combination of fentanyl and midazolam to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus. MATERIAL/METHODS: This study was performed based on anesthesia records. Depending on the drugs that w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24535067 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889833 |
_version_ | 1782304583904657408 |
---|---|
author | Isitemiz, Ilke Uzman, Sinan Toptaş, Mehmet Vahapoglu, Ayşe Gül, Yaşar Gökhan Inal, Ferda Yilmaz Akkoc, Ibrahim |
author_facet | Isitemiz, Ilke Uzman, Sinan Toptaş, Mehmet Vahapoglu, Ayşe Gül, Yaşar Gökhan Inal, Ferda Yilmaz Akkoc, Ibrahim |
author_sort | Isitemiz, Ilke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this retrospective comparative study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of fentanyl, midazolam, and a combination of fentanyl and midazolam to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus. MATERIAL/METHODS: This study was performed based on anesthesia records. Depending on the drugs that would be given before the induction of anesthesia with etomidate, the patients were separated into 4 groups: no pretreatment (Group NP), fentanyl 1 μg·kg(−1) (Group F), midazolam 0.03 mg·kg(−1) (Group M), and midazolam 0.015 mg·kg(−1) + fentanyl 0.5 μg·kg(−1) (Group FM). Patients who received the same anesthetic procedure were selected: 2 minutes after intravenous injections of the pretreatment drugs, anesthesia is induced with 0.3 mg·kg(−1) etomidate injected intravenously over a period of 20–30 seconds. Myoclonic movements are evaluated, which were observed and graded according to clinical severity during the 2 minutes after etomidate injection. The severity of pain due to etomidate injection, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Study results showed that myoclonus incidence was 85%, 40%, 70%, and 25% in Group NP, Group F, Group M, and Group FM, respectively, and were significantly lower in Group F and Group FM. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pretreatment with fentanyl or combination of fentanyl and midazolam was effective in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3930766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39307662014-02-21 Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study Isitemiz, Ilke Uzman, Sinan Toptaş, Mehmet Vahapoglu, Ayşe Gül, Yaşar Gökhan Inal, Ferda Yilmaz Akkoc, Ibrahim Med Sci Monit Drug Controlled Studies BACKGROUND: In this retrospective comparative study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of fentanyl, midazolam, and a combination of fentanyl and midazolam to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus. MATERIAL/METHODS: This study was performed based on anesthesia records. Depending on the drugs that would be given before the induction of anesthesia with etomidate, the patients were separated into 4 groups: no pretreatment (Group NP), fentanyl 1 μg·kg(−1) (Group F), midazolam 0.03 mg·kg(−1) (Group M), and midazolam 0.015 mg·kg(−1) + fentanyl 0.5 μg·kg(−1) (Group FM). Patients who received the same anesthetic procedure were selected: 2 minutes after intravenous injections of the pretreatment drugs, anesthesia is induced with 0.3 mg·kg(−1) etomidate injected intravenously over a period of 20–30 seconds. Myoclonic movements are evaluated, which were observed and graded according to clinical severity during the 2 minutes after etomidate injection. The severity of pain due to etomidate injection, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Study results showed that myoclonus incidence was 85%, 40%, 70%, and 25% in Group NP, Group F, Group M, and Group FM, respectively, and were significantly lower in Group F and Group FM. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pretreatment with fentanyl or combination of fentanyl and midazolam was effective in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3930766/ /pubmed/24535067 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889833 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Drug Controlled Studies Isitemiz, Ilke Uzman, Sinan Toptaş, Mehmet Vahapoglu, Ayşe Gül, Yaşar Gökhan Inal, Ferda Yilmaz Akkoc, Ibrahim Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title | Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title_full | Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title_fullStr | Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title_short | Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study |
title_sort | prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: which is superior: fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? a retrospective comparative study |
topic | Drug Controlled Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24535067 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isitemizilke preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT uzmansinan preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT toptasmehmet preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT vahapogluayse preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT gulyasargokhan preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT inalferdayilmaz preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT akkocibrahim preventionofetomidateinducedmyoclonuswhichissuperiorfentanylmidazolamoracombinationaretrospectivecomparativestudy |