Cargando…
A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668 |
_version_ | 1782304606466867200 |
---|---|
author | Prabhu, Jyothi S. Korlimarla, Aruna Desai, Krisha Alexander, Annie Raghavan, Rohini Anupama, CE Dendukuri, Nandini Manjunath, Suraj Correa, Marjorrie Raman, N Kalamdani, Anjali Prasad, MSN Gopinath, K.S Srinath, B.S. Sridhar, T.S. |
author_facet | Prabhu, Jyothi S. Korlimarla, Aruna Desai, Krisha Alexander, Annie Raghavan, Rohini Anupama, CE Dendukuri, Nandini Manjunath, Suraj Correa, Marjorrie Raman, N Kalamdani, Anjali Prasad, MSN Gopinath, K.S Srinath, B.S. Sridhar, T.S. |
author_sort | Prabhu, Jyothi S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology and clinical behavior of these low ER staining tumors. Methods: We have developed a probabilistic score of the “ER-positivity” by quantitative estimation of ER related gene transcripts from FFPE specimens. Immunohistochemistry for ER was done on 240 surgically excised tumors of primary breast cancer. Relative transcript abundance of 3 house-keeping genes and 6 ER related genes were determined by q-RT PCR. A logistic regression model using 3 ER associated genes provided the best probability function, and a cut-off value was derived by ROC analysis. 144 high ER (>10%), 75 ER negative and 21 low-ER (1-10%) tumors were evaluated using the probability score and the disease specific survival was compared. Results: Half of the low-ER positive tumors were assigned to the ER negative group based on the probability score; in contrast 95% of ER negative and 92% of the high ER positive tumors were assigned to the appropriate ER group (p<0.0001). The survival of the low-ER group was intermediate between that of the high ER positive and ER negative groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly lowered ASCO-CAP criteria for ER positivity, leads to the false categorization of biologically ER negative tumors as ER positive ones. This may have particular relevance to India, where we have a much higher proportion of ER negative tumors in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3930907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39309072014-02-21 A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors Prabhu, Jyothi S. Korlimarla, Aruna Desai, Krisha Alexander, Annie Raghavan, Rohini Anupama, CE Dendukuri, Nandini Manjunath, Suraj Correa, Marjorrie Raman, N Kalamdani, Anjali Prasad, MSN Gopinath, K.S Srinath, B.S. Sridhar, T.S. J Cancer Research Paper Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology and clinical behavior of these low ER staining tumors. Methods: We have developed a probabilistic score of the “ER-positivity” by quantitative estimation of ER related gene transcripts from FFPE specimens. Immunohistochemistry for ER was done on 240 surgically excised tumors of primary breast cancer. Relative transcript abundance of 3 house-keeping genes and 6 ER related genes were determined by q-RT PCR. A logistic regression model using 3 ER associated genes provided the best probability function, and a cut-off value was derived by ROC analysis. 144 high ER (>10%), 75 ER negative and 21 low-ER (1-10%) tumors were evaluated using the probability score and the disease specific survival was compared. Results: Half of the low-ER positive tumors were assigned to the ER negative group based on the probability score; in contrast 95% of ER negative and 92% of the high ER positive tumors were assigned to the appropriate ER group (p<0.0001). The survival of the low-ER group was intermediate between that of the high ER positive and ER negative groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly lowered ASCO-CAP criteria for ER positivity, leads to the false categorization of biologically ER negative tumors as ER positive ones. This may have particular relevance to India, where we have a much higher proportion of ER negative tumors in general. Ivyspring International Publisher 2014-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3930907/ /pubmed/24563670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Prabhu, Jyothi S. Korlimarla, Aruna Desai, Krisha Alexander, Annie Raghavan, Rohini Anupama, CE Dendukuri, Nandini Manjunath, Suraj Correa, Marjorrie Raman, N Kalamdani, Anjali Prasad, MSN Gopinath, K.S Srinath, B.S. Sridhar, T.S. A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title | A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title_full | A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title_fullStr | A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title_short | A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors |
title_sort | majority of low (1-10%) er positive breast cancers behave like hormone receptor negative tumors |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prabhujyothis amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT korlimarlaaruna amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT desaikrisha amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT alexanderannie amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT raghavanrohini amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT anupamace amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT dendukurinandini amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT manjunathsuraj amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT correamarjorrie amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT ramann amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT kalamdanianjali amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT prasadmsn amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT gopinathks amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT srinathbs amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT sridharts amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT prabhujyothis majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT korlimarlaaruna majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT desaikrisha majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT alexanderannie majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT raghavanrohini majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT anupamace majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT dendukurinandini majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT manjunathsuraj majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT correamarjorrie majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT ramann majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT kalamdanianjali majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT prasadmsn majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT gopinathks majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT srinathbs majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors AT sridharts majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors |