Cargando…

A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors

Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhu, Jyothi S., Korlimarla, Aruna, Desai, Krisha, Alexander, Annie, Raghavan, Rohini, Anupama, CE, Dendukuri, Nandini, Manjunath, Suraj, Correa, Marjorrie, Raman, N, Kalamdani, Anjali, Prasad, MSN, Gopinath, K.S, Srinath, B.S., Sridhar, T.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563670
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668
_version_ 1782304606466867200
author Prabhu, Jyothi S.
Korlimarla, Aruna
Desai, Krisha
Alexander, Annie
Raghavan, Rohini
Anupama, CE
Dendukuri, Nandini
Manjunath, Suraj
Correa, Marjorrie
Raman, N
Kalamdani, Anjali
Prasad, MSN
Gopinath, K.S
Srinath, B.S.
Sridhar, T.S.
author_facet Prabhu, Jyothi S.
Korlimarla, Aruna
Desai, Krisha
Alexander, Annie
Raghavan, Rohini
Anupama, CE
Dendukuri, Nandini
Manjunath, Suraj
Correa, Marjorrie
Raman, N
Kalamdani, Anjali
Prasad, MSN
Gopinath, K.S
Srinath, B.S.
Sridhar, T.S.
author_sort Prabhu, Jyothi S.
collection PubMed
description Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology and clinical behavior of these low ER staining tumors. Methods: We have developed a probabilistic score of the “ER-positivity” by quantitative estimation of ER related gene transcripts from FFPE specimens. Immunohistochemistry for ER was done on 240 surgically excised tumors of primary breast cancer. Relative transcript abundance of 3 house-keeping genes and 6 ER related genes were determined by q-RT PCR. A logistic regression model using 3 ER associated genes provided the best probability function, and a cut-off value was derived by ROC analysis. 144 high ER (>10%), 75 ER negative and 21 low-ER (1-10%) tumors were evaluated using the probability score and the disease specific survival was compared. Results: Half of the low-ER positive tumors were assigned to the ER negative group based on the probability score; in contrast 95% of ER negative and 92% of the high ER positive tumors were assigned to the appropriate ER group (p<0.0001). The survival of the low-ER group was intermediate between that of the high ER positive and ER negative groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly lowered ASCO-CAP criteria for ER positivity, leads to the false categorization of biologically ER negative tumors as ER positive ones. This may have particular relevance to India, where we have a much higher proportion of ER negative tumors in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3930907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39309072014-02-21 A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors Prabhu, Jyothi S. Korlimarla, Aruna Desai, Krisha Alexander, Annie Raghavan, Rohini Anupama, CE Dendukuri, Nandini Manjunath, Suraj Correa, Marjorrie Raman, N Kalamdani, Anjali Prasad, MSN Gopinath, K.S Srinath, B.S. Sridhar, T.S. J Cancer Research Paper Background: The 2010 guidelines by ASCO-CAP have mandated that breast cancer specimens with ≥1% positively staining cells by immunohistochemistry should be considered Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive. This has led to a subclass of low-ER positive (1-10%) breast cancers. We have examined the biology and clinical behavior of these low ER staining tumors. Methods: We have developed a probabilistic score of the “ER-positivity” by quantitative estimation of ER related gene transcripts from FFPE specimens. Immunohistochemistry for ER was done on 240 surgically excised tumors of primary breast cancer. Relative transcript abundance of 3 house-keeping genes and 6 ER related genes were determined by q-RT PCR. A logistic regression model using 3 ER associated genes provided the best probability function, and a cut-off value was derived by ROC analysis. 144 high ER (>10%), 75 ER negative and 21 low-ER (1-10%) tumors were evaluated using the probability score and the disease specific survival was compared. Results: Half of the low-ER positive tumors were assigned to the ER negative group based on the probability score; in contrast 95% of ER negative and 92% of the high ER positive tumors were assigned to the appropriate ER group (p<0.0001). The survival of the low-ER group was intermediate between that of the high ER positive and ER negative groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly lowered ASCO-CAP criteria for ER positivity, leads to the false categorization of biologically ER negative tumors as ER positive ones. This may have particular relevance to India, where we have a much higher proportion of ER negative tumors in general. Ivyspring International Publisher 2014-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3930907/ /pubmed/24563670 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Prabhu, Jyothi S.
Korlimarla, Aruna
Desai, Krisha
Alexander, Annie
Raghavan, Rohini
Anupama, CE
Dendukuri, Nandini
Manjunath, Suraj
Correa, Marjorrie
Raman, N
Kalamdani, Anjali
Prasad, MSN
Gopinath, K.S
Srinath, B.S.
Sridhar, T.S.
A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title_full A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title_fullStr A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title_full_unstemmed A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title_short A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors
title_sort majority of low (1-10%) er positive breast cancers behave like hormone receptor negative tumors
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3930907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563670
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.7668
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhujyothis amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT korlimarlaaruna amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT desaikrisha amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT alexanderannie amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT raghavanrohini amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT anupamace amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT dendukurinandini amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT manjunathsuraj amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT correamarjorrie amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT ramann amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT kalamdanianjali amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT prasadmsn amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT gopinathks amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT srinathbs amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT sridharts amajorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT prabhujyothis majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT korlimarlaaruna majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT desaikrisha majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT alexanderannie majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT raghavanrohini majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT anupamace majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT dendukurinandini majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT manjunathsuraj majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT correamarjorrie majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT ramann majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT kalamdanianjali majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT prasadmsn majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT gopinathks majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT srinathbs majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors
AT sridharts majorityoflow110erpositivebreastcancersbehavelikehormonereceptornegativetumors