Cargando…

Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND: Hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis usually occurs in older immunocompromised patients with other comorbidities. They are usually unable to undergo reconstructive anterior and posterior surgeries. Therefore, an alternative, less aggressive surgical method of transpedicular curettag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Byung Ho, Park, Jin-Oh, Kim, Hak-Sun, Lee, Hwan-Mo, Cho, Byung-Woo, Moon, Seong-Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.125508
_version_ 1782304618449993728
author Lee, Byung Ho
Park, Jin-Oh
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Hwan-Mo
Cho, Byung-Woo
Moon, Seong-Hwan
author_facet Lee, Byung Ho
Park, Jin-Oh
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Hwan-Mo
Cho, Byung-Woo
Moon, Seong-Hwan
author_sort Lee, Byung Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis usually occurs in older immunocompromised patients with other comorbidities. They are usually unable to undergo reconstructive anterior and posterior surgeries. Therefore, an alternative, less aggressive surgical method of transpedicular curettage and drainage was suggested. This study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes for the treatment of hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis between transpedicular curettage and drainage technique and conventional combined anterior and posterior surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and July 2011, 26 patients underwent surgical treatment for hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis. The patients were classified into two groups depending on surgical modality: a transpedicular curettage and drainage (TCD) group and a combined anterior and posterior surgery (CAPS) group. RESULTS: The TCD group consisted of 10 patients (mean age 68.0 years), and the CAPS group consisted of 16 patients (mean age 58.4 years). The mean postoperative followup periods were 36.9 (months) in the TCD group and 69.9 (months) in the CAPS group. The operation time was 180.6 ± 33.6 minutes in the TCD group and 332.7 ± 74.5 minutes in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). Postoperative independent ambulation began at postoperative 4.9 ± 2.4 days in the TCD group but at postoperative 15.1 ± 15.3 days in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stays were 19.9 ± 7.8 days in the TCD group and 35.4 ± 33.3 days in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). The level of C-reactive proteins decreased significantly in both groups after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Transpedicular curettage and drainage technique proved to be a useful technique for treating hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis in patients who were in poor heath with multiple comorbidities unable to undergo the conventional combined anterior and posterior surgery in a single day in terms of earlier ambulation, shorter hospitalization and similar clinical success rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3931157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39311572014-03-05 Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis Lee, Byung Ho Park, Jin-Oh Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Hwan-Mo Cho, Byung-Woo Moon, Seong-Hwan Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis usually occurs in older immunocompromised patients with other comorbidities. They are usually unable to undergo reconstructive anterior and posterior surgeries. Therefore, an alternative, less aggressive surgical method of transpedicular curettage and drainage was suggested. This study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes for the treatment of hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis between transpedicular curettage and drainage technique and conventional combined anterior and posterior surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and July 2011, 26 patients underwent surgical treatment for hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis. The patients were classified into two groups depending on surgical modality: a transpedicular curettage and drainage (TCD) group and a combined anterior and posterior surgery (CAPS) group. RESULTS: The TCD group consisted of 10 patients (mean age 68.0 years), and the CAPS group consisted of 16 patients (mean age 58.4 years). The mean postoperative followup periods were 36.9 (months) in the TCD group and 69.9 (months) in the CAPS group. The operation time was 180.6 ± 33.6 minutes in the TCD group and 332.7 ± 74.5 minutes in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). Postoperative independent ambulation began at postoperative 4.9 ± 2.4 days in the TCD group but at postoperative 15.1 ± 15.3 days in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stays were 19.9 ± 7.8 days in the TCD group and 35.4 ± 33.3 days in the CAPS group (P < 0.05). The level of C-reactive proteins decreased significantly in both groups after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Transpedicular curettage and drainage technique proved to be a useful technique for treating hematogeneous infectious spondylodiscitis in patients who were in poor heath with multiple comorbidities unable to undergo the conventional combined anterior and posterior surgery in a single day in terms of earlier ambulation, shorter hospitalization and similar clinical success rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3931157/ /pubmed/24600067 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.125508 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Byung Ho
Park, Jin-Oh
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Hwan-Mo
Cho, Byung-Woo
Moon, Seong-Hwan
Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title_full Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title_fullStr Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title_full_unstemmed Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title_short Transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
title_sort transpedicular curettage and drainage versus combined anterior and posterior surgery in infectious spondylodiscitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.125508
work_keys_str_mv AT leebyungho transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis
AT parkjinoh transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis
AT kimhaksun transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis
AT leehwanmo transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis
AT chobyungwoo transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis
AT moonseonghwan transpedicularcurettageanddrainageversuscombinedanteriorandposteriorsurgeryininfectiousspondylodiscitis