Cargando…

Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience

Objective: Multiple options for reconstruction of scalp defects exist with local tissue advancement and free tissue transfer the mainstay of reconstruction. Over the last 12 years, our tertiary referral hospital has performed more than 150 scalp reconstructions. We reviewed our experience with large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eck, Dustin L., Koonce, Stephanie L., Al Majed, Bader M., Perdikis, Galen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567771
_version_ 1782304663294443520
author Eck, Dustin L.
Koonce, Stephanie L.
Al Majed, Bader M.
Perdikis, Galen
author_facet Eck, Dustin L.
Koonce, Stephanie L.
Al Majed, Bader M.
Perdikis, Galen
author_sort Eck, Dustin L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Multiple options for reconstruction of scalp defects exist with local tissue advancement and free tissue transfer the mainstay of reconstruction. Over the last 12 years, our tertiary referral hospital has performed more than 150 scalp reconstructions. We reviewed our experience with large scalp defects and evaluated whether free tissue transfer is a viable first option for reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all scalp reconstructions from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2011. A cohort of patients with defects greater than 50 cm(2) were identified for a total of 64 operations; 10 free flaps, 28 local advancement flaps, and 26 skin grafts. Reoperation rates and complications were compared between groups. Results: Reoperation rate in the free flap group was 20% (2/10). Both reoperations were within the immediate postoperative period, one for microvascular thrombotic occlusion and the other for postoperative hematoma. The local tissue transfer group had a 14% reoperation rate (4/28), all for debridement of partial flap loss. The skin graft cohort had a 12% reoperation rate (3/26) for 1 complete and 2 partial skin graft failures; all required repeat grafting. Reoperation for free-flap complications did not require rehospitalization. In contrast, the skin graft and non–free flap reoperations frequently required rehospitalization. Conclusion: Though free tissue transfer has a higher occurrence of reoperation within the immediate postoperative period, completion of reconstruction usually occurs within a single hospitalization. Free tissue transfer is a feasible option, and we advocate for its use as a primary method for repairing large scalp defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3931441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39314412014-02-24 Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience Eck, Dustin L. Koonce, Stephanie L. Al Majed, Bader M. Perdikis, Galen Eplasty Journal Article Objective: Multiple options for reconstruction of scalp defects exist with local tissue advancement and free tissue transfer the mainstay of reconstruction. Over the last 12 years, our tertiary referral hospital has performed more than 150 scalp reconstructions. We reviewed our experience with large scalp defects and evaluated whether free tissue transfer is a viable first option for reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all scalp reconstructions from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2011. A cohort of patients with defects greater than 50 cm(2) were identified for a total of 64 operations; 10 free flaps, 28 local advancement flaps, and 26 skin grafts. Reoperation rates and complications were compared between groups. Results: Reoperation rate in the free flap group was 20% (2/10). Both reoperations were within the immediate postoperative period, one for microvascular thrombotic occlusion and the other for postoperative hematoma. The local tissue transfer group had a 14% reoperation rate (4/28), all for debridement of partial flap loss. The skin graft cohort had a 12% reoperation rate (3/26) for 1 complete and 2 partial skin graft failures; all required repeat grafting. Reoperation for free-flap complications did not require rehospitalization. In contrast, the skin graft and non–free flap reoperations frequently required rehospitalization. Conclusion: Though free tissue transfer has a higher occurrence of reoperation within the immediate postoperative period, completion of reconstruction usually occurs within a single hospitalization. Free tissue transfer is a feasible option, and we advocate for its use as a primary method for repairing large scalp defects. Open Science Company, LLC 2014-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3931441/ /pubmed/24567771 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Eck, Dustin L.
Koonce, Stephanie L.
Al Majed, Bader M.
Perdikis, Galen
Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title_full Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title_fullStr Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title_short Evaluation of Options for Large Scalp Defect Reconstruction: A 12-Year Experience
title_sort evaluation of options for large scalp defect reconstruction: a 12-year experience
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567771
work_keys_str_mv AT eckdustinl evaluationofoptionsforlargescalpdefectreconstructiona12yearexperience
AT kooncestephaniel evaluationofoptionsforlargescalpdefectreconstructiona12yearexperience
AT almajedbaderm evaluationofoptionsforlargescalpdefectreconstructiona12yearexperience
AT perdikisgalen evaluationofoptionsforlargescalpdefectreconstructiona12yearexperience