Cargando…
WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages
BACKGROUND: Pedometer-based programs have elicited increased walking behaviors associated with improvements in blood pressure in sedentary/low active postmenopausal women, a population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Such programs typically encourage increasing the volume of physical ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24528783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-168 |
_version_ | 1782304667030519808 |
---|---|
author | Tudor-Locke, Catrine Swift, Damon L Schuna, John M Dragg, Amber T Davis, Allison B Martin, Corby K Johnson, William D Church, Timothy S |
author_facet | Tudor-Locke, Catrine Swift, Damon L Schuna, John M Dragg, Amber T Davis, Allison B Martin, Corby K Johnson, William D Church, Timothy S |
author_sort | Tudor-Locke, Catrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pedometer-based programs have elicited increased walking behaviors associated with improvements in blood pressure in sedentary/low active postmenopausal women, a population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Such programs typically encourage increasing the volume of physical activity with little regard for its intensity. Recent advances in commercially available pedometer technology now permit tracking of both steps/day and time in moderate (or greater) intensity physical activity on a daily basis. It is not known whether the dual message to increase steps/day while also increasing time spent at higher intensity walking will elicit additional improvements in blood pressure relative to a message to only focus on increasing steps/day. The purpose of this paper is to present the rationale, study design, and protocols employed in WalkMore, a 3-arm 3-month blinded and randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the effects of two community pedometer-based walking interventions (reflecting these separate and combined messages) relative to a control group on blood pressure in sedentary/low active post-menopausal women, a population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS/DESIGN: 120 sedentary/low active post-menopausal women (45-74 years of age) will be randomly assigned (computer-generated) to 1 of 3 groups: A) 10,000 steps/day (with no guidance on walking intensity/speed/cadence; BASIC intervention, n = 50); B) 10,000 steps/day and at least 30 minutes in moderate intensity (i.e., a cadence of at least 100 steps/min; ENHANCED intervention, n = 50); or a Control group (n = 20). An important strength of the study is the strict control and quantification of the pedometer-based physical activity interventions. The primary outcome is systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes include diastolic blood pressure, anthropometric measurements, fasting blood glucose and insulin, flow mediated dilation, gait speed, and accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior. DISCUSSION: This study can make important contributions to our understanding of the relative benefits that walking volume and/or intensity may have on blood pressure in a population at risk of cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Record NCT01519583, January 18, 2012 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3931482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39314822014-02-22 WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages Tudor-Locke, Catrine Swift, Damon L Schuna, John M Dragg, Amber T Davis, Allison B Martin, Corby K Johnson, William D Church, Timothy S BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pedometer-based programs have elicited increased walking behaviors associated with improvements in blood pressure in sedentary/low active postmenopausal women, a population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Such programs typically encourage increasing the volume of physical activity with little regard for its intensity. Recent advances in commercially available pedometer technology now permit tracking of both steps/day and time in moderate (or greater) intensity physical activity on a daily basis. It is not known whether the dual message to increase steps/day while also increasing time spent at higher intensity walking will elicit additional improvements in blood pressure relative to a message to only focus on increasing steps/day. The purpose of this paper is to present the rationale, study design, and protocols employed in WalkMore, a 3-arm 3-month blinded and randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the effects of two community pedometer-based walking interventions (reflecting these separate and combined messages) relative to a control group on blood pressure in sedentary/low active post-menopausal women, a population at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS/DESIGN: 120 sedentary/low active post-menopausal women (45-74 years of age) will be randomly assigned (computer-generated) to 1 of 3 groups: A) 10,000 steps/day (with no guidance on walking intensity/speed/cadence; BASIC intervention, n = 50); B) 10,000 steps/day and at least 30 minutes in moderate intensity (i.e., a cadence of at least 100 steps/min; ENHANCED intervention, n = 50); or a Control group (n = 20). An important strength of the study is the strict control and quantification of the pedometer-based physical activity interventions. The primary outcome is systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes include diastolic blood pressure, anthropometric measurements, fasting blood glucose and insulin, flow mediated dilation, gait speed, and accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior. DISCUSSION: This study can make important contributions to our understanding of the relative benefits that walking volume and/or intensity may have on blood pressure in a population at risk of cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Record NCT01519583, January 18, 2012 BioMed Central 2014-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3931482/ /pubmed/24528783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-168 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tudor-Locke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tudor-Locke, Catrine Swift, Damon L Schuna, John M Dragg, Amber T Davis, Allison B Martin, Corby K Johnson, William D Church, Timothy S WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title | WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title_full | WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title_fullStr | WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title_full_unstemmed | WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title_short | WalkMore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
title_sort | walkmore: a randomized controlled trial of pedometer-based interventions differing on intensity messages |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24528783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tudorlockecatrine walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT swiftdamonl walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT schunajohnm walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT draggambert walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT davisallisonb walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT martincorbyk walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT johnsonwilliamd walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages AT churchtimothys walkmorearandomizedcontrolledtrialofpedometerbasedinterventionsdifferingonintensitymessages |