Cargando…
Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus
Commercially available preparations of cypermethrin (Clinar and Ectomin) and fenvalerate (Flytik and Ticomax, 20% E.C) were compared for their acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus using adult immersion test. Adult tick mortality was higher with Ectomin compared to Clinar....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-90 |
_version_ | 1782304727352999936 |
---|---|
author | Ravindran, Reghu Ramankutty, Sunil Athalathil Juliet, Sanis Palayullaparambil, Adarsh Krishna Thumadath Gopi, Jyothimol Gopalan, Ajith Kumar Karapparambu Nair, Suresh Narayanan Ghosh, Srikanta |
author_facet | Ravindran, Reghu Ramankutty, Sunil Athalathil Juliet, Sanis Palayullaparambil, Adarsh Krishna Thumadath Gopi, Jyothimol Gopalan, Ajith Kumar Karapparambu Nair, Suresh Narayanan Ghosh, Srikanta |
author_sort | Ravindran, Reghu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Commercially available preparations of cypermethrin (Clinar and Ectomin) and fenvalerate (Flytik and Ticomax, 20% E.C) were compared for their acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus using adult immersion test. Adult tick mortality was higher with Ectomin compared to Clinar. Complete eclosion blocking was observed at all the tested concentrations with Ectomin while it was observed only at the highest concentration tested for Clinar. Compared to Flytik, adult tick mortality was higher with Ticomax at the tested concentrations. Complete blocking of hatching of laid ova was observed with Flytik at the highest concentration tested. At the manufacture recommended dosage of 200 ppm Ectomin elicited 93.37 per cent inhibition of fecundity, while it was 91.7 per cent for Clinar. For fenvalerate, the recommended concentration was 1200 ppm at which Ticomax showed 86 per cent and Flytik produced 80.05 per cent inhibition of fecundity respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3931862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39318622014-02-25 Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus Ravindran, Reghu Ramankutty, Sunil Athalathil Juliet, Sanis Palayullaparambil, Adarsh Krishna Thumadath Gopi, Jyothimol Gopalan, Ajith Kumar Karapparambu Nair, Suresh Narayanan Ghosh, Srikanta Springerplus Research Commercially available preparations of cypermethrin (Clinar and Ectomin) and fenvalerate (Flytik and Ticomax, 20% E.C) were compared for their acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus using adult immersion test. Adult tick mortality was higher with Ectomin compared to Clinar. Complete eclosion blocking was observed at all the tested concentrations with Ectomin while it was observed only at the highest concentration tested for Clinar. Compared to Flytik, adult tick mortality was higher with Ticomax at the tested concentrations. Complete blocking of hatching of laid ova was observed with Flytik at the highest concentration tested. At the manufacture recommended dosage of 200 ppm Ectomin elicited 93.37 per cent inhibition of fecundity, while it was 91.7 per cent for Clinar. For fenvalerate, the recommended concentration was 1200 ppm at which Ticomax showed 86 per cent and Flytik produced 80.05 per cent inhibition of fecundity respectively. Springer International Publishing 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3931862/ /pubmed/24570856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-90 Text en © Ravindran et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ravindran, Reghu Ramankutty, Sunil Athalathil Juliet, Sanis Palayullaparambil, Adarsh Krishna Thumadath Gopi, Jyothimol Gopalan, Ajith Kumar Karapparambu Nair, Suresh Narayanan Ghosh, Srikanta Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title | Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title_full | Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title_fullStr | Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title_short | Comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus |
title_sort | comparison of in vitro acaricidal effects of commercial preparations of cypermethrin and fenvalerate against rhipicephalus (boophilus) annulatus |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-90 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ravindranreghu comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT ramankuttysunilathalathil comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT julietsanis comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT palayullaparambiladarshkrishnathumadath comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT gopijyothimol comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT gopalanajithkumarkarapparambu comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT nairsureshnarayanan comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus AT ghoshsrikanta comparisonofinvitroacaricidaleffectsofcommercialpreparationsofcypermethrinandfenvalerateagainstrhipicephalusboophilusannulatus |