Cargando…

A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience

BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters (CVCs) has greatly improved the quality-of-care in cancer patients, yet these catheters may cause serious infectious and thrombotic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to study the various types of CVCs and their complications. MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Sachin A., Shukla, Shilin N., Talati, Shailesh S., Parikh, Sonia K., Bhatt, Shivani J., Maka, Vinayak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604950
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125234
_version_ 1782304813659193344
author Jain, Sachin A.
Shukla, Shilin N.
Talati, Shailesh S.
Parikh, Sonia K.
Bhatt, Shivani J.
Maka, Vinayak
author_facet Jain, Sachin A.
Shukla, Shilin N.
Talati, Shailesh S.
Parikh, Sonia K.
Bhatt, Shivani J.
Maka, Vinayak
author_sort Jain, Sachin A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters (CVCs) has greatly improved the quality-of-care in cancer patients, yet these catheters may cause serious infectious and thrombotic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to study the various types of CVCs and their complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied retrospectively 213 cases of CVCs in our institute with their indications, type and complications from August 2010 to July 2011. RESULTS: A total of 213 CVCs were inserted in patients with hematological (62%) and solid organ malignancies (38%). Ninety-eight patients (46%) had peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC), 90 (42%) patients had Hickman catheters and 25 (12%) had a port. The median duration of retention of Hickman catheters was 104 days (3-365 days), for the peripherally inserted central catheters was 59 days (3-100 days) and for the port it was 280 days (45-365 days). Non-infective complications were more than infective (12% vs. 7%). The most common complication was non-infective occlusion and thrombophlebitis. In one patient with PICC thrombosis occurred in the cephalic, radial and ulnar vein and in one patient with port thrombosis occurred in the superior vena cava. Organisms were isolated in 60% (12 out of 20) of cultures. Common organisms isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 5 (42%), Staphylococcus aureus in 2 (16%), Escherichia coli in 2 (16%) and Aspergillus in 3 (25%) patients. 7 out of 12 infected patients had negative blood cultures within 7 days of antibiotic treatment, 5 patients remained positive for more than 7 days with antibiotics. In 155 patients (73%), the desired treatment protocol was completed and at present there are still 28 patients (13%) with catheters. 5 patients (2.3%) died of febrile neutropenia and septicemia with multi-organ failure. In 5 patients (2.3%), the catheters (1 Port, 1 Hickman and 3 PICC) were prematurely removed because of thrombosis. CONCLUSION: CVCs are better options to facilitate the long-term vascular access provided infection is prevented with meticulous care and treated promptly with proper antibiotics. Most CVCs is acceptable to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3932588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39325882014-03-06 A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience Jain, Sachin A. Shukla, Shilin N. Talati, Shailesh S. Parikh, Sonia K. Bhatt, Shivani J. Maka, Vinayak Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters (CVCs) has greatly improved the quality-of-care in cancer patients, yet these catheters may cause serious infectious and thrombotic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to study the various types of CVCs and their complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied retrospectively 213 cases of CVCs in our institute with their indications, type and complications from August 2010 to July 2011. RESULTS: A total of 213 CVCs were inserted in patients with hematological (62%) and solid organ malignancies (38%). Ninety-eight patients (46%) had peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC), 90 (42%) patients had Hickman catheters and 25 (12%) had a port. The median duration of retention of Hickman catheters was 104 days (3-365 days), for the peripherally inserted central catheters was 59 days (3-100 days) and for the port it was 280 days (45-365 days). Non-infective complications were more than infective (12% vs. 7%). The most common complication was non-infective occlusion and thrombophlebitis. In one patient with PICC thrombosis occurred in the cephalic, radial and ulnar vein and in one patient with port thrombosis occurred in the superior vena cava. Organisms were isolated in 60% (12 out of 20) of cultures. Common organisms isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 5 (42%), Staphylococcus aureus in 2 (16%), Escherichia coli in 2 (16%) and Aspergillus in 3 (25%) patients. 7 out of 12 infected patients had negative blood cultures within 7 days of antibiotic treatment, 5 patients remained positive for more than 7 days with antibiotics. In 155 patients (73%), the desired treatment protocol was completed and at present there are still 28 patients (13%) with catheters. 5 patients (2.3%) died of febrile neutropenia and septicemia with multi-organ failure. In 5 patients (2.3%), the catheters (1 Port, 1 Hickman and 3 PICC) were prematurely removed because of thrombosis. CONCLUSION: CVCs are better options to facilitate the long-term vascular access provided infection is prevented with meticulous care and treated promptly with proper antibiotics. Most CVCs is acceptable to patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3932588/ /pubmed/24604950 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125234 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Sachin A.
Shukla, Shilin N.
Talati, Shailesh S.
Parikh, Sonia K.
Bhatt, Shivani J.
Maka, Vinayak
A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title_full A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title_fullStr A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title_short A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience
title_sort retrospective study of central venous catheters gcri experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604950
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125234
work_keys_str_mv AT jainsachina aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT shuklashilinn aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT talatishaileshs aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT parikhsoniak aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT bhattshivanij aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT makavinayak aretrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT jainsachina retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT shuklashilinn retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT talatishaileshs retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT parikhsoniak retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT bhattshivanij retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience
AT makavinayak retrospectivestudyofcentralvenouscathetersgcriexperience